Paul Smeenus wrote: » I know Wally did - I thought both had? Maybe not.
Buer wrote: » Which was only fractionally more weird than that time Kearney started at 12 for Leinster!
yerrahbah wrote: » Drico is on the Late Late Show
Dave_The_Sheep wrote: » Wab?
Paul Smeenus wrote: » Belfast slang. Thought everyone in the North said it, but was corrected by a Newry nyuck
salmocab wrote: » Nyuck?
irishbucsfan wrote: » A nyuck is a scrinch, but from Newry
Buer wrote: » I'm not sure there's much to be said for John Hayes as a bench option based on your criteria. As a genuine bench option, Porter is actually probably as good as we've had in the past 20 years. .
bilston wrote: » I know I know, and I did think about putting Porter in there...but then I had to consider Thomond's wellbeing. The wing is competitive. Earls could easily start, maybe the fact he has switched between wing and centre (even FB on occasion) hasn't helped his cause in my eyes. BTW, I listened to the pod with BOD and Wood yesterday and I thought it was pretty clear from the way that he kept countering Woodie's selection of ROG at 10 that BOD would have gone for Sexton if he really had to pick. However there is one thing I'd say, if it came to a last minute kick to win the game, I'd probably rather have ROG lining up to take it than Sexton.
Tommybojangles wrote: » I was about to reply to the last sentence of your post but then I had a Vietnam style flashback to this forum around 2010/2011.
awec wrote: » So the money thing was in this weekends Irish Times, in an article by Gerry Thornley, that all is not well between the players and the IRFU. The players, via RPI, are seeking visibility into the usually highly-secretive finances of the IRFU in order to determine if the 20% paycuts being imposed are actually warranted, and that they are targeting the right areas for savings. The RPI is not a union, so players cannot strike. Are the other IRFU staff unionised?
Thrashssacre wrote: » Presumably if James lowe is too start on the wings would this push stockdale out of the 23 entirely or do we reckon he'll get a spot on the bench?
Thrashssacre wrote: » Potential irish 23 by November: 1: healy 2: Kelleher 3: furlong 4: ryan 5: Henderso 6: dorris 7: van der flier 8: stander 9: Murray 10: sexton 11: lowe 12: ringrose 13: henshaw 14: earls 15: larmour 16: porter 17: Cronin 18: baird 19: leavy/deegan 20: Cooney 21: carbery 22: aki 23: Addison
Thrashssacre wrote: » Potential irish 23 by November: 1: healy 2: Kelleher 3: furlong 4: ryan 5: Henderson 6: dorris 7: van der flier 8: stander 9: Murray 10: sexton 11: lowe 12: ringrose 13: henshaw 14: earls 15: larmour 16: porter 17: Cronin 18: baird 19: leavy/deegan 20: Cooney 21: carbery 22: aki 23: Addison
Kevski wrote: » I think that Baird is unlikely to be playing at tighthead!
thomond2006 wrote: » Conway won't be outside the 23 barring injury and Sean Cronin has no business in an Irish squad anymore
Thrashssacre wrote: » I think Cronin still has a role as an impact sub, i suppose you'd have Conway in ahead of Addison then?