awec wrote: » Is Wood related to POM or something?
Buer wrote: » Listen to the piece. They were all mentioned, I think. Hickie never had the consistency of Earls or Bowe and suffered badly with injuries. Clohsessy was very good; he wasn't in Healy's class though. For a sustained period, I don't think many would have Henderson or Maggs ahead of D'Arcy although both were excellent players at their best. But D'Arcy in 2004 was nominated for world player of the year deservedly. Nobody in their right mind would have Geordan Murphy ahead of Kearney. Incredibly talented but was incredibly unreliable too.
Buer wrote: » Wood had him next in line behind Wallace and ahead of Ferris.
TomsOnTheRoof wrote: » Interesting breakdown of our forward's carry stats in this years Six Nations. Obviously it makes for a small sample size but it gives you an idea of where the work is being done. Courtesy of u/cleverbadger101 over on the rugby subreddit.
Former Former wrote: » I'm a little skeptical of this tbh. If I'm reading it right, Stander and Ryan made 150 metres each with ball in hand over three matches? That's 50-odd metres per game? No, that's not right, not even remotely. Am I missing something?
awec wrote: » Don't know why people get so worked up about it, everyone knows Humphreys was better than both of them anyway.
sydthebeat wrote: » Ian was a fine fine player!
Buer wrote: » I'm not sure if the numbers are accurate (the ones on Irish Rugby site appear different) but the overall message is clear: we are overwhelmingly reliant on two guys to carry a huge amount of ball. And it's worth mentioning that neither of those two guys are particularly destructive or elusive carriers at this level. They'll truck it up all day long and get over the gain line but they do not break the gain line or suck a defender in and put someone else away. Wood made a pertinent point on Ryan the other night when he said that he would be far better making 8-10 carries a match than 16-18 carries. Someone who is 6'7" and already jumping in the line out and packing down at lock has enough wear and tear on their bodies without getting smashed repeatedly. If he wants to be still playing top level rugby in a decade at 33, he's going to have to adjust. Stander might play in the same manner but he's built more for it and didn't start playing test rugby until he was almost 26 so won't have that same level of mileage. We are far too one dimensional in our attack and we desperately need to review our selection and approach in our pack. Unfortunately, we had Doris taken out of the equation and he's a guy who could very well be a big piece of the puzzle. However, it's not good enough that we turned back to VDF and POM. Their carrying at test level simply isn't nearly good enough.
Buer wrote: » I found their comments around guys like Flannery, Leamy, Reddan etc. to be more interesting than a lot of their actual selections. I was genuinely surprised to hear BOD ask Wood why he wasn't considering Leamy at all and speak about his skill levels which he considered to be higher than those of Wallace.
Podge_irl wrote: » Gotta say, I never would have associated the word skilful with Leamy. Great player and bloody powerful but not skilful in the classic sense of the word.
clsmooth wrote: » Henderson came through as a ball carrying 6 and was shifted into the row where he’s expected to smash rucks all day. He’s definitely lost his dynamism from his younger days but looks noticeably heavier and you see the benefit of this in close quarters with his choke tackling, ball stripping and strength in contact. He’s basically doing the role that JS hoped Roux and Kleyn could do. He doesn’t have that nasty edge/aggression to become a stand out enforcer. We as fans just miss seeing him run over the likes of Eben Etzebeth and don’t see the work he does in tight. A shaved head and Chabal like beard would probably do a lot for his image as a destructive player I think Ryan’s workrate though is on another level hence racking up huge numbers all over the board which is the exception to the rule.
yerrahbah wrote: » Not sure it counts as skill, but this is a standout memory of Leamyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9jltodVhAU
Paul Smeenus wrote: » Did Leamy not line out at centre once or twice?
aloooof wrote: » Think that was Wally? For Munster, at least.
irishbucsfan wrote: » Imagine playing against Quinlan, Wallace, Foley and Leamy all at the same time
[Deleted User] wrote: » There'd be a helluva fight for the last piece of puddin