dundalkfc10 wrote: » Your a perfect example of why people will vote Sinn Fein.
blanch152 wrote: » You have captured the essence of the Sinn Fein vote in that one sentence. Sinn Fein voters are against things. They could be against the government, against the man, against the poster on boards that they don't like, against the Brits, against the Prods, against the travellers, against Denis O'Brien, against Leo, against FG etc. They are never for a positive vision.
blanch152 wrote: » If it is only "kind of the done thing", that is just a personal interpretation and you can't demand it or require it of someone else. You certainly can't harrass them for it.
As for the "defended thugs" allegation, you know and I know that your definition of thugs is more limited than mine. Gerry Adams is a thug, Martin McGuinness was a thug, you have defended them countless times. No need to produce a link for what is known. Next time I proclaim the world is round and not flat, I won't be producing a link either. Anyway, thanks for not answering the question, and not producing the link. It has only proved my point.
Yeah_Right wrote: » Is that just your way of saying that I'm sensible, thoughtful, intelligent, hard working and that I care about the direction Ireland is going in? Thank you
dundalkfc10 wrote: » A Rugby Fan, Hows that ivory tower in D4 with your American Accent?
Going by your post history on various threads - a partitionist too.
Yeah_Right wrote: » Yes I'm a rugby fan. And proud of it. Was that meant to be an insult? Never lived in D4 but I did live in D6 for about 6 years. Is that close enough? I do have a foreign accent but its never been mistaken for an American one. If not wanting to pay more taxes to fund the basket case that is NI and not wanting any part of their violent, sectarian BS makes me a Partionist, then yes I'm a Partionist.
blanch152 wrote: » https://www.buzz.ie/football/dundalk-derry-fight-337772 It could be worse, rather than being a rugby fan, you could be associated with this lot.
dundalkfc10 wrote: » North Men, South Men comrades all Dublin, Belfast, Cork and Donegal We're one the one road singin along Singin' a Soldier's Song
Hamsterchops wrote: » Does every country have this dilemma We're called this, oh no we're not because we're called that, well I don't agree with either of those names, because I say we're called something else! Ireland, Eire, Southern Ireland, Northern Ireland, the South, the North, the Free State, 32 Counties, Six Counties, the North of Ireland, the South of Ireland, the island of Ireland. The Republic of Ireland. Hibernia.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Hey...maybe they don't want to talk to PBP...isn't that ok? To decide you don't want to talk to another party with a mandate?
Another guy talking up 'de crisis'. Yes another election of they cannot form a government. That is how it should work according to the constitution and the democratic process.
markodaly wrote: » So, SF dont want to talk to other parties who may be interested in forming a left wing government... wow! Just WOW!
Yes, in normal scenarios but in case you have not noticed, we are in the middle of a global pandemic so such an outcome could literally cost lives, but hey once SF increases their number of TD's so they can off and do **** all, then all will be well. Anyway, another election comes to pass... then what. SF may have say mid 40's high 40's number of TDs. They will need at least 3 other parties to go into government if they are not going to talk to FF. If it is FF, then another one needs to be on board. Then what? Give us some sound bytes about SF will take the 'moral ground' and not be bought out by x number of Garda stations? Yes, I am sure SF will get 100% of what they want and will not compromise on anything. :rolleyes:
jm08 wrote: » You need to know where the country is coming from to know where it is going! You may have learned a lot about Ireland from history books - it would be interesting to know who wrote them?
jm08 wrote: » The problem of what Ireland is called goes back to the British Government refusing to acknowledge officially the name that Ireland choose to be called and deciding in the Ireland Act 1949 that the country formerly known as 'Eire' would now be referred to in British Law as 'Republic of Ireland' and not as 'Ireland' as named in Irish Law and Constitution. This problem persisted until recently. Stuff like the President would not be referred to or written officially as President of Ireland by the British Government. It was just bullying. The Irish Government were well up to replying in kind (for example, any extradition requests were returned on the technicality that the request was to a country that didn't exist! The EU recognising that the name of the country is 'Ireland' in the English language and "Eire'' in Irish language more or less made them come around to using the name that the people of Ireland had chosen for itself. Not sure if the Ireland Act 1949 was ever changed in the UK - probably not.
jh79 wrote: » You also provided a link to rte and said that changed things. How did it change things?
rob316 wrote: » Waste of time this party is, fail to understand you can't make change unless you actually govern.
McMurphy wrote: » Going by your post history on various threads - a partitionist too.
Hamsterchops wrote: » But what is the definition of a partitionist? Somebody who accepts the internationally recognised boundary between the UK and the ROI, or somebody who doesn't? Please explain.
FrancieBrady wrote: » In Ireland, partitionism (Irish: críochdheighiltíocht) refers to views on Irish politics, culture, geography, or history that treat Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland as distinct. Partitionists may emphasise the perceived differences between the two jurisdictions and the people who live within them.
blackwhite wrote: » You mean like the SF cheerleaders who repeatedly tell anyone from the South that they aren’t qualified to comment on anything in the North because “you don’t know what it’s like” ?