blanch152 wrote: » Would be interesting in the first leaders debate when all 7 or 8 of them line up, and they are asked who got serious about discussing a Programme for Government. Would Mary-Lou be able to lie her way out of that?
Bishop of hope wrote: » We might well be back in the fray in a week, be interesting if we are. I think SF are praying the greens pass it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Who's 'spluttering and crying'? They won't talk to SF and deserve to be criticised for the power grabbers they are. They are playing into SF's hands no matter which way the cookie crumbles...I think that is where the anger and frustration is coming from. Mort thinks that FF and FG will have gained votes by term end.
blanch152 wrote: » Could add a couple to your list..... We have Sinn Fein spluttering and crying about how nobody will talk to them, while they ignore those that try. We have posters going after other posters because their shrill criticisms of others rebound on their favourite Sinn Fein.
FrancieBrady wrote: » We have FF TD's warning about the imminent demise of FF if the coalesce with FG. We have FG in alleged data breaches warning about the rise of SF if members vote for this wishlist. We have green TD's also warning about handing the power to SF. We have posters who claim steadfastly to know about how SF works getting in a strop about not knowing how the party they votes for works (the Green Northern vote) and getting caught out telling transparent lies about...guess who?...SF.. Yeh Brendan...loads of anger and fear in the hood!
blanch152 wrote: » There is a lot of that around, some people are very disappointed tonight after Catherine Martin backed the deal.
Poor_old_gill wrote: » But you can infer connections from any government policy as the economy is, by its nature, interconnected. You could say welfare payments are causing hospital waiting times to go up as poorer people spend a larger proportion of their income on alcohol and alcohol is a major cause of hospital admissions so if we cancel the dole then hospitals will be free.We could go in circles on that stuff all day but it is very rare that you hear the party that is perceived as our most right wing being called out for increasing social welfare payments. To be honest it smacks of needing something to criticise them for but not knowing what you are talking about.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You are off on the cryptic juice again Brendan. I'm sure it does have some connection to your boogeymen but for the life of me I can't figure it out.
Poor_old_gill wrote: » To be honest it smacks of needing something to criticise them for but not knowing what you are talking about.
Bowie wrote: » I did. I was giving 'fair comment' on any fascist connections past or present. A bloated welfare system funnels money to private business rather than any more cost effective alternatives. If the tax payer wasn't funding private profits with rent allowances and 25 year leases where would the money come from? The more cost effective state aid becomes the less profits for landlord investment companies and individual landlords, be they TD or accidental.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Uhmmm ..... maybe toss Garda HQ a bell, they could give you a solid, dude.
Poor_old_gill wrote: » Your post is a pile of irrelevant waffle Read his post - those right wingers and their bloated social welfare budget
FrancieBrady wrote: » Is there one even in situ at the minute? Why it would have anything to do with this defeats me though.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Just wondering......
FrancieBrady wrote: » Public Accounts Committee? No idea Brendan...why?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » What are the PAC lads saying Francie ?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Lot of anger here today, she’s starting to spin out of control. Maybe time to.........y’know....pull the trigger.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Dudes should sign up for a meditation app or something, Brendan.
Bowie wrote: » What passes as liberal sometimes coincidentally makes the most money for private business. Luxury apartments leased for 25 years for example. Their willingness to oversee record breaking societal crises for private profit would dispel such thoughts. We know at least one current Fine Gael Councilor, (O'Leary) admires fascists. And FG cosy up to people who think Asylum seekers should be sent to education camps if they need the numbers and another thinks Irish people protesting are similar to ISIS and the party has fascist roots, not forgetting Oliver J. Flanagan the celebrated antisemite.
Poor_old_gill wrote: » FG are often called right wing/fascist by some on here and you are accusing them of the complete opposite? This pointless vitriol that keeps being lobbed about with regard to the government is f*ckin painful. So you are sick of FG's left wing policies, is that what you are saying?
Bishop of hope wrote: » I don't think it's covid number 19 you know!
Bishop of hope wrote: » Oops, a Simon moment there?
Bowie wrote: » Actually I phrase it so in case he's reading, to help him follow along
blanch152 wrote: » Could you cut the codology of using statements from the poverty industry who have a vested interest in ensuring the country is miserable? You claim to be against vested interests, yet you use them as much as you possibly can.
blanch152 wrote: » Let's agree that Mary-Lou is a liar first, as you are not challenging that conclusion, and then we can discuss whether or not I am one too. If it took some subterfuge to get the evidence to show that Mary-Lou is a liar, I can live with your label.
thomasdylan wrote: » I hate it when I say 'Chemo ward closed' but meant to say that some cancer screenings were suspended. It makes me look like I don't really know what I'm taking about.