HairySalmon wrote: » Do you have access to B2B pricing to be explain your confidence? You seem to be basing things off of B2C pricing when these companies are signing up to near-decade long agreements for parts and have digital service strategies at play for now and for the lifetime of the console.
Homelander wrote: » It's interesting that this thread is a hive of activity, while other on the Xbox forum, there's barely any discussion by comparison.
billybonkers wrote: » Render of the dimensions
AdamD wrote: » Jesus its huge
CastorTroy wrote: » Is Northern Tayto worth more?
How Soon Is Now wrote: » https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.eurogamer.net/amp/2020-06-18-horizon-forbidden-west-launches-2021-on-playstation-5 No chance of Horizon as a launch title so. Could really do with something to rival Halo just don't know what it's gonna be at this stage!
Creamy Goodness wrote: » Halo was never a good game, average at absolute best.
Homelander wrote: » That's a bit of a silly argument just because you don't like the game. It's the game the original Xbox was built on, sells by the bucket load, critically acclaimed, has broken sales records on many occasions. There's not much else to take away from that except it's a good game. I don't know why people go out of their way to claim Halo isn't good, like it's all some sort of hoax, and all the reviewers and millions of fans are missing something. Like, I thought Horizon Zero Dawn was boring, but I figured it was just not to my taste rather than go around telling people it's a bad game when clearly it objectively isn't. Killzone is the closest thing Sony has to Halo, but it is nowhere near as popular because it's nowhere near as good. For a long time Halo was literally the only reason I even had an Xbox, and the reason I chose Xbox over Playstation. It was the main reason all my friends had 360's over the PS3 as well. It even took me away from PC gaming for a long time.
jonerkinsella wrote: » I said last week in this thread that the consoles will be €400 and €500. I also said that there would be a lot of potential price leaks coming out in the next few weeks. This is starting to transpire for the PS and XbX/S. With the rumors of a huge event by MS in July with a potential price announcement, I am now thinking that the consoles are actually gonna be cheaper. I think Sony want MS to go with the €500 on the XbX and they will drop to €450 for the F and €350 for the D. Remember the article on Bloomberg reporting the manufacturing cost of $450 per unit. Sony are in the ballpark with that. I think MS have spent quite a lot more on speccing out the XbX with the more raw power components. Sony are storming way ahead of MS in the interest from consumers for the next gen. Viewer indicators of PS vs XB on Youtube are a clear indicator of this. Sony are jebating MS. Lets see who commits first. I think it will be MS as they are under pressure to make this a success. Sony can afford to wait in the tall grass.
Stone Deaf 4evr wrote: » Chocolate ice cream is an abomination.
Mr Crispy wrote: » At last, someone is speaking sense.
Mike3287 wrote: » Keep a few euro for electric bill though Those things will be power hungry, likely be a good bit higher than current gen consoles given the crazy high clock speeds.
CastorTroy wrote: » Anyway to go off topic, does installing a game from disc, take up as much space as if you downloaded it?
Homelander wrote: » Ah, okay. So all the millions of fans who love the story, lore and multiplayer are just wrong or don't know any better, as are the reviewers.
billybonkers wrote: » Not really, the architecture is quite a bit more efficient
How Soon Is Now wrote: » So now it seems Cyberpunk 2077 is delayed AGAIN and due to be released around the time of the rumored PS5 launch. Coincidence? :pac:
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/8a022abb175d445f2b5b8a1c545f3d3f.svg)
