maestroamado wrote: » Mary lou will put nothing together and she knows it, she is just a whinger. Its important to know what you know, however.... "it's just as important to know what you don't know" She simply has not got it and she knows it, that's why she has being quiet since the election..
Yeah_Right wrote: » It was established by a Sinn Fein supporter in one of the other threads that if you vote for anything other than what they want then you anti-democratic. Democracy only works if everyone agrees with Sinn Fein.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » There's a growing possibility that the Green Party members won't vote for the deal. Then it's back to the drawing board. Mary Lou can put together a coalition of change with Labour, Social Democrats, Greens, Loony Left, and Independents. That's certainly change. Or FF could throw MM and a few others under the bus, and start playing footsie with SF. Rotating Taoiseach etc. FG go and sit in opposition.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » It's who the people voted for, Francis. It's called democracy, and the Republic is a fine example of it.
markodaly wrote: » And your alternative is what exactly? Jump up and down on a keyboard and give out about it? SF has done nothing, literally nothing since the election in an effort to form a government. PBP sent them a letter which afaik, they didn't even bother responding to. That shows you SF's interest right there.
Happy out to be in opposiition while carrying out the 'But da establishment is against us' **** talk. So what alternative practical solution is there? Another election? SF and FG and others? SF and FF and others? What is your proposal on what should have happened?
FrancieBrady wrote: » We can see the fallacy of trying to sledgehammer governments together. 128 days to concoct what even the negotiators are calling a 'wishlist' and one principal negotiator is probably not even going to vote for it. Shambolic and desperate attempts to cling to power will always end in disaster, tears and gnashing of teeth and those involved usually pay the price.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You can ask the same ridiculous question of an independent...why couldn't Michael Lowry persuade the other 80+ into his realm. He didn't and he couldn't. The numbers were not there. Is anything simpler to understand?
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Ireland or Éire. I'm a native speaker myself so we would always have used the former ourselves. Maybe I'm a bit 'jippy' with the idea of former planters who flipped, men from the Pale, and bitter civil war Cork men suddenly having some of narrative on what it means to be Irish.
Mortelaro wrote: » Its name isn't 'the state' or the 'free state' either Its official name is just Ireland
jm08 wrote: » Republic of Ireland isn't the name of the country, it's the name of the soccer team. Why are you insisting that they refer to it as Rep. Of Ireland?
JohnnyFlash wrote: » The country was the poorest in Western Europe when we achieved independence. We are now ranked 3rd on the UN Human Development Index. That's in the world btw . It was the terrorist wing of SF who did so much to try and undermine that. Even now they refuse to refer to it as the Republic of Ireland. The hubris of 1st time SF supporters really is something else.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » . The hubris of 1st time SF supporters really is something else.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Because Feb sure as hell showed they were pissed at FF and FG's efforts.
FrancieBrady wrote: » 86% vote share between them at it's height...44% today. Seems to me going up the rankings in the world was dependent on them falling in popularity. That's my read.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You are good at making things up to read. Carry on till your carried off, as they say.
Mortelaro wrote: » Just my read But risky move on ye're part I must say Except my other read is ye just couldn't give a Fuck about government as long as the wages keep coming in...
FrancieBrady wrote: » Now you are back to just inventing something that was said.
Mortelaro wrote: » Voters,we don't want to implement our policies until, you give us a majority
FrancieBrady wrote: » You call it 'abdication' I say there is no onus on anybody to form a sledgehammered government. The numbers to create a cohesive government that could complete a programme of government were not there.
You are obviously one of the ever diminishing 44%. No surprise there.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You can call it lack lustre. I call it pragmatism...why sledgehammer an absurdity together as has been done over the last 128 days? The power swap has gotten people used to this nonsense.
Gunmonkey wrote: » Oh oh oh is it "random things connected together and presented as an argument" time? Always loved that: -rise of Sinn Fein and the degredation of the global climate -increase in Irish ranking on UN Human Development Index JohnnyFlash mentioned and the partition of North and South Ireland,which SF wants to reverse...so they want worse lives for the citizens of this island -Sinn Fein wins a lot of votes in last election, worldwide pandemic of highly infectious disease....coincidence? Just my read. (PS, can you find me the % vote share of the last 3 general elections, and compare that to Irelands rankings for quality of life, because surely by your assertion it would only have increased from February...right?)
Mortelaro wrote: » Your still not addressing SF's abdication of government forming responsibility
Oh and A swap is consensual btw Up to the last Dáil FF and FG most certainly did not consent to the other being in power,so you are of course factually wrong on that matter
FrancieBrady wrote: » Elections and government formation are two different things. We had an election...we may not be able to have a government though Like people huffing about the factual descriptor 'partitionist' being an insult, the two parties have swapped power in this country since it's foundation...fact.
Mortelaro wrote: » Maths isn't a script, its numbers The question remains, why SF could not persuade 80+ T.D's into its realm