FrancieBrady wrote: » And an ever decreasing number are falling for the pretence that they are different parties. Which was the con. Sad to say many fell for it.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » It's who the people voted for, Francis. It's called democracy, and the Republic is a fine example of it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Like people huffing about the factual descriptor 'partitionist' being an insult, the two parties have swapped power in this country since it's foundation...fact.
Mortelaro wrote: » That's for the first time an admission ye lost the election
I don't see the sense in losing the opportunity to be in government aswell though The power swap slur against the FF, FG and labour voters shown up of course as vacuous given SF's to date lack of effort at forming something of its own in those same 128 days Its always someone else's fault I suppose...
FrancieBrady wrote: » You can call it lack lustre. I call it pragmatism...why sledgehammer an absurdity together as has been done over the last 128 days? The power swap has gotten people used to this nonsense.
Mortelaro wrote: » And this speaks to Sinn Féins lack lustre efforts to form an alternative government how exactly?
FrancieBrady wrote: » We can see the fallacy of trying to sledgehammer governments together. 128 days to concoct what even the negotiators are calling a 'wishlist' and one principal negotiator is probably not even going to vote for it. Shambolic and desperate attempts to cling to power will always end in disaster, tears and gnashing of teeth and those involved usually pay the price.
Mortelaro wrote: » No,that's just actual what the fuck level ridiculous I can only assume that Sinn Féin decided to gamble with their constituents That 5 more years of disastrous FF and FG government devastating and destituting their lives with austerity and higher taxes is a price worth paying to gain more seats ... Their poor voters it'll be a gamble as erudite as their candidate selection for February 2020
FrancieBrady wrote: » You can ask the same ridiculous question of an independent...why couldn't Michael Lowry persuade the other 80+ into his realm. He didn't and he couldn't. The numbers were not there. Is anything simpler to understand?
FrancieBrady wrote: » As I thought. Not a notion, just the familiar scripted retort.
Mortelaro wrote: » Maths isn't a script, its numbers The question remains, why SF could not persuade 80+ T.D's into its realm
Deleted User wrote: » Really? To me it’s just stating the obvious. One party, if they really wanted, could have formed a government with the rest of the elected TDs without either FF or FG.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It means that this has been trotted out ad nauseum by a group of posters on here. So much so that it sounds scripted.
Deleted User wrote: » What does this mean? I’m my own person and speak as I see.
Deleted User wrote: » FG + FF = 73 All the others totalled 87 Simples.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Do them for us. Let us see where the support was. You claimed it, you back it up.
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Putting the country first by completely ignoring a party who got about 25% of the votes? Thats what you do for your country alright.
Deleted User wrote: » I know that they didn’t respond to PBP. How do I know that the numbers are there? I did the sums.
FrancieBrady wrote: » How do you know this?
Deleted User wrote: » Of course the numbers were there. Even without FF and FG. SF just didn’t try.
Deleted User wrote: » That is the point that people are ignoring or missing. They are putting the country first. The fallout from the Covid pandemic will be monumental and tough decisions will have to be made. The fickle electorate will punish whoever makes those decisions. Kudos to Leo, Michael and Eamon for stepping up.
blanch152 wrote: » I am not wading through the sludge of the old Politics Cafe to find the relevant posts, but Francie defended the endorsement of Slab Murphy as a good republican. He knows it, everyone knows it, why pretend otherwise?
As you regularly point out when defending those thugs,
blanch152 wrote: » The numbers are there. They are there for every party, that is just a silly excuse. Just compromise and negotiate a common Programme for Government. It is the art of the possible.Let us be fair to FF/FG/Greens. They have showed that they have the ability to get together and negotiate something. Yes, they may have problems getting it over the line, but their leaders have put a shoulder to the wheel.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Where did I 'defend' Slab Murphy?
Mortelaro wrote: » I have an unerring faith in human nature To capture the disaffected, you have to have disaffected Dedisaffect them, love bomb them mooney style effectively is the open goal SF has handed this new government An opportunity knocked and an opportunity has been lost
FrancieBrady wrote: » The numbers weren't there...looks more and more likely they aren't there for FF, FG and the Greens too. 128 days wasted because they are all running scared of being blamed for another election?