Wibbs wrote: » ... Well it depends on a few things too. The US was a colony based on and needing immigrants. Secondly Irish people can "pass" as local far more easily than African, or Asian. Indeed that was one point of bitterness between African and Irish Americans in the 19th century, that the latter had an advantage out of the box over their darker brethren looking for employment. ...
ollkiller wrote: » I don't know of you're aware but there are multiple economic articles that confirm that immigration in the short term drives wages down but in the long term increases productivity and wage levels. So if your argument is that immigration decreases wage levels then you're wrong.
BarnardsLoop wrote: » Plenty of ye do nothing but think about race, clearly.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Decreases wage levels for poor people through increasing supply of labour, increases salaries for people who profit from cheap labour. Both things can be true.
Deleted User wrote: » The key word missing from your post is "legal". Legal immigration is a good thing for an economy. It is the illegal migrants that are a met drain on resources. I really hate how people deliberately muddle the two in order to fit their agenda.
biko wrote: » The best way to argue for multiculturalism is by showing examples of countries where it works.
biko wrote: » Good, now we're getting somewhere. Can you elaborate on Germany? Have the Turks integrated well?
Thelonious Monk wrote: » People bang on about multiculturalism failing in other countries because of a few things they see in the news or websites, when in reality multiculturalism works very well in the UK and France etc for the most part.
Personally I couldn't care less who lives in Ireland, it makes Dublin way more interesting to me anyway to have lots of different people and cultures here. People lamenting losing our own culture, well every generation is different anyway and our Grandparents would have been moaning about things changing too. People are people in my view and I don't care where my neighbour is from as long as they're decent folks.
Richard Hillman wrote: » Big fan of immigration. EU/EEA immigration, Most Eastern European immigration, South/Central American immigration, Far East Asian immigration, Some Indian immigration, immigration from AUS/NZ, USA-Canada. That is all.
kildare lad wrote: » Good to see the sudanese integrating in Australia aswellhttps://www.sausageroll.com.au/news/australian-teen-girl-brutally-beaten-by-black-lives-activists-in-melbourne-cbd/
kildare lad wrote: » You're missing out on a very large continent there lad
Richard Hillman wrote: » Oh.... I did, didn't I.
o1s1n wrote: » Have you seen how many doctors working in our hospitals aren't Irish? How many Philipina nurses work in our wards? How many high paying roles in IT companies are populated with people from all over the globe? You do realise they're all immigrants too, right?
Lefty Bicek wrote: » What you are referencing there is a multi-ethnic Ireland, not a multicultural one. Do you know the difference ? Multiculturalism is toxic, poisonous, failed BS. That is the difference.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Good to see the white man integrating down there too, the way they treated the aboriginals - including us Irish, our president even apologised. My point is people are mostly the same everywhere, some good some bad.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Yeah the Turks have. I used to go out with a girl from Hamburg, there are lovely parts of the city with loads of Turkish restaurants and cafes etc. Same in Berlin and many cities in Germany. The Turks make up about 5% of the German population and add a lot to the country if you ask me.
I Am Nobody wrote: » That much is true. Wasn't up until the mid 60's that the Aboriginals were classed as vermin?Or is my thinking mixed up.
kildare lad wrote: » Still are in all of places , when I was they're a lot of Aussies didn't like them . They've had huge social problems with alcohol that's doing their community no favours .