Sonrisa wrote: » Is that an anonymous submission by Ann Doherty? :pac:
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » This submission someone posted on Twitter regarding the South Mall cycle lane made me laugh. Contradicts himself over and over. Has he seen the width of the road?
Frostybrew wrote: » Yes separate segregation would be better. I would say they're going for two way due to the amount of bus stops on the S. Mall. Could get very tricky with waiting passengers spilling onto new bike lane. Parliament bridge junction will also be tricky. The traffic lights at the corner of S. Mall and G. Parade will have to be used by cyclists to cross over, unless they're going to designate part of the G. Parade paving as a cycle lane.
TheChizler wrote: » I'm not a fan of these 2 way cycle lanes on the same side of the road, it's not natural to cross over a lane of traffic to cycle on the right hand side. Also do you have to give way to traffic coming from Parliament Bridge? Its the busiest junction would have thought it would make more sense to have it in the other side, or one on each side like Washington St., though you'd have to contend with buses then.
TheChizler wrote: » Also how do you get to it from Grand Parade? By cycling across oncoming traffic? It won't be used by people coming from that direction, maybe if they come over Nano Nagle Bridge.
namloc1980 wrote: » Yes Grand Parade bit of a gap alright. Surely that'll happen next after this. I wouldn't underestimate the level of opposition that will come from this especially as regards the parking - it'll change from diagonal to parallel so inevitably less spaces. Expect to see a reaction from certain quarters.
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » Should continue around to Grand parade, down Washington and connect with the one on the Western rd. Nice to see things taking a positive step for a change re: cycling
namloc1980 wrote: » Absolutely and done for their own selfish purposes and certainly not for the betterment of the city. They'd rather keep the current system where they get to have a go of having the ceremonial chain for a year than see reform in local government. I reckon Limerick, Galway and Dublin will have a directly elected mayor long before Cork does.
namloc1980 wrote: » . 2 way cycle lane proposed for South Mall. It'll require reorientation of parking. Expect tantrums and frothing at the mouth from certain city centre traders. Credit where it is due to the Council - it's a positive start.
EnzoScifo wrote: » Licensing and opening times will be changed in conjunction with the implementation of a night mayor
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » Totally agree. Huge missed opportunity, scuppered by some false, misleading info put out by a few political individuals.
whisky_galore wrote: » Night life in this country is rubbish with our puritanical licencing hours. Half embarrassed showing foreigners around when everyone gets shown the door and thrown out in the street just when things are going nicely. Unless Cork is going to have different laws to the rest of the country I can't see what can be improved.
namloc1980 wrote: » According to the Programme for Government the directly elected mayor in Limerick will be elected in 2021 and the office will receive a package of financial support. It also says that from 2024 any local authority may have a directly elected mayor but only where it is either specifically requested by the Council in question or by a petition of 20% of voters in that Council area. Such a shame it was rejected here - at a minimum we'd be spared the annual charade of the handing over of the ceremonial chain between FF and FG.
namloc1980 wrote: » - Establish a night time culture mayor (never heard of this before).
marno21 wrote: » There is SFA planned for implementation in Cork during the lifetime of this Government in CMATS anyway. Apart from filling up filing cabinets with endless reports there was very little on the ground work planned.
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » Similar to a night Czar : https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/arts-and-culture/24-hour-london/night-czar
namloc1980 wrote: » So the Programme for Government has been published. Document is high level and Cork is mentioned 5 times in it specifically: - Commitment to implementing CMATS - Specific mention of progressing BusConnects - Commitment to prioritise rail projects - A vague mention of developing Cork and the other smaller cities as viable alternatives to Dublin - Establish a night time culture mayor (never heard of this before).