bubblypop wrote: » Pedestrians can enter any gate. Why would only two gates being open put people off?
bubblypop wrote: » Take it from someone who is in there everyday, there is no parking in grass on the north road. None at all.
polesheep wrote: » ...There are cars parked on the grass throughout the Park at the weekend. ....
ongarboy wrote: » ...We got easy parking near Ashtown gates albeit on the grass verge where many others were parked. ...
bubblypop wrote: » Just the two main gates on Chesterfield Ave
beauf wrote: » . So people are instead parking on the grass on the North road, where there is no parking. At least so I hear. Sounds like a nightmare if you caught in traffic, best to avoid.
polesheep wrote: » Exactly the same as what?
polesheep wrote: » ...It's a park not a carpark. I'm reminded of Dollymount beach where people turned the beach into a carpark and thereby removed the amenity of a beach. It defied logic.
The role of Chesterfield Avenue in the broader road network of the Greater Dublin Area has long been acknowledged. Although routing through a public park, Chesterfield Avenue provides traffic with a direct link between Castleknock/Blanchardstown and Dublin City Centre via the Liffey Quays. The result is a relatively high traffic volume using Chesterfield Avenue, at approximately 10,000 vehicles per day on weekdays, reducing to 8,000 vehicles per day at weekends. Highest traffic volumes are on the eastern section of Chesterfield Avenue (east of the Papal Cross) where weekend traffic flows are in excess of 9,000 vehicles per day. This volume of traffic on Chesterfield Avenue is clearly inconsistent with its setting within a Park of National and International importance.
Pat Dunne wrote: » And what brings you to the conclusion that this is sufficient capacity?
beauf wrote: » Except AFAIK you can park on bull Island. On Causeway road. There's even a golf course on it. With parking.https://www.google.ie/maps/@53.3697732,-6.1487581,3a,75y,320.41h,72.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYk7ul1wTsYqNGn3pPaDsBg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192https://www.google.ie/maps/@53.3750808,-6.1378664,3a,90y,342.82h,73.83t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sCVrPU-qH3UAkkOVhTCbOXA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 Also it doesn't go anywhere so not a transport link 9 million car journeys. Its doesn't have 10 million visitors. The Zoo alone is Irelands 3rd most popular Visitor attraction with 1.3 million. Garda headquarters, Hospital and nursing homes. Etc. Do people want to ban cars from Causeway road or the Golf course?So exactly the same.
Pat Dunne wrote: » Ah so it Parking Management more than parking capacity that is your concern.
bubblypop wrote: » because I am in the Park every day, and I can see that even when drivers park on the grass in one place, there are still car parking places available in different parts of the park.
Pat Dunne wrote: » And what makes you draw the conclusion that this is sufficient capacity?
bubblypop wrote: » there are car parking spaces at Lords walk carpark beside the Army sports ground beside the cricket pitch beside the Polo club at the popes cross, and also across the road from there in the visitors centre in Farmleigh along Military road beside the soccer changing rooms off the Upper Glen road inside the Knokmaroon gate along Furze road Only lazy drivers park on the grass. Their cars should be towed when they do.
bubblypop wrote: » There is already plenty of carparking space in the park. No need for more.
horse7 wrote: » There's 1747 acres in the park ,I think we can afford a few for car parks and let more people enjoy it.
polesheep wrote: » Surely you can see that more carparks in the park means less park?
polesheep wrote: » Not true. I would like to see changes made that reduce the number of cars in the park. I say this as someone for whom not being able to drive through the park will become a PITA. It's a park not a carpark. I'm reminded of Dollymount beach where people turned the beach into a carpark and thereby removed the amenity of a beach. It defied logic.
horse7 wrote: » It would be better to have more carparks there so people could enjoy the park. It's not 1660 any more, we have to move with the times.
beauf wrote: » Obviously you don't want anything changed. So the hour long tailbacks, and dangerous junctions, and parking on the grass, destroying it, will remain. Same extreme views with the children's hospital. Hence we now have that in the worst possible location and made it one of the most expensive hospital building projects in the world. 90% of people will travel to that in car. But there won't be any space for them either. Same with the park. Remove all cars, when the majority of people use car to get to it. But thats fine. Limit access to those who use public transport and those that can walk or cycle to it.
iamwhoiam wrote: » Going to the Zoo tomorrow at 3:30 Are the gates open and where can we park ? We have a young child with us who can’t walk too far . Thank you for any help
polesheep wrote: » I don't see why they cannot cover the entire park with tarmac. That way everyone driving to visit the park will get a parking space.
beauf wrote: » I don't see why they can't make the gates wider put a wide roundabout in. Any signal controlled junction would make traffic worse. It makes it safer...but slower.