Digital ID's for everyone

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

you can put the same mark on multiple people. what use is it then?

It's a pre-programmed data mark, 'each' containing unique extensive digitised sets of data (all x16 biometric measurements, and all paper/card IDs).
Doh!.... it's not the same for any two persons.

Similar, but much better than an old fashioned QRCodethat itself avails of numeric data strings lengths upto 7,089 to encode with. That simple cryptographic (QR) uses simple 1/0 values in it's square pattern. The QDT uses micro-needles at almost nano-level to build more complex patterns.

Is also by it's nature iRed&UV scannable, and flourses under such light for increased legibility. Also contains medical grade polymers and copper (thus conductive: and likely {like the unique pattern}, to have a unique passive RF antenna signature) when scanned under RF tranmissions.

You don't spend millions and millions of the best team of technologists on the planet and get in return, get some ink hand stamp you'd expect to see when heading into a nightclub as proof of paid entry ...Which is what ohnonotgmail reckons this embodiment mark is, lols.

ohnonotgmail

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

It's a pre-programmed data mark, 'each' containing unique extensive digitised sets of data (all x16 biometric measurements, and all paper/card IDs).
Doh!.... it's not the same for any two persons.

Similar, but much better than an old fashioned QRCodethat itself avails of numeric data strings lengths upto 7,089 to encode with. That simple cryptographic (QR) uses simple 1/0 values in it's square pattern. The QDT uses micro-needles at almost nano-level to build more complex patterns.

Is also by it's nature iRed&UV scannable, and flourses under such light for increased legibility. Also contains medical grade polymers and copper (thus conductive: and likely {like the unique pattern}, to have a unique passive RF antenna signature) when scanned under RF tranmissions.

You don't spend millions and millions of the best team of technologists on the planet and get in return, get some ink hand stamp you'd expect to see when heading into a nightclub as proof of paid entry ...Which is what ohnonotgmail reckons this embodiment mark is, lols.

i know it SHOULD'NT be the same for multiple people. we're not as thick as you think we are. But what is to stop the same mark being applied twice by unscrupulous people? people fake all kinds of ID, you dont think they will try to fake these as well? better off sticking to actual biometrics. much harder to fake.

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

i know it SHOULD'NT be the same for multiple people. we're not as thick as you think we are. But what is to stop the same mark being applied twice by unscrupulous people? people fake all kinds of ID, you dont think they will try to fake these as well? better off sticking to actual biometrics. much harder to fake.

Doh!

And as this data mark can contain all x16 biometic measurements (16 times better than any singlular biometric), as well as digitised values from all paper and card variants of ID.

Thus muti-stage verification is easily avaiable, if any one biometic (whatever measurement tool is at hand) does not match the QDT's value for that method (fingeprint, facescan, age, height etc etc) any fraudster will have a whole heap of questions to answer, as well as suffer denial of services.

This is even assuming someone has the nano-tech to re-embed in the 1st place. The data itself will be paired and encapsulation with an assigned UniD, and avail of blockchain Azure encryption and for each and every data packet request.

I.e. If you think it's a bit like photocoping someone elses driving licence before a rake about in the GTi, well think again.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Doh!

And as this data mark can contain all x16 biometic measurements (16 times better than any singlular biometric), as well as digitised values from all paper and card variants of ID.

Thus muti-stage verification is easily avaiable, if any one biometic (whatever measurement tool is at hand) does not match the QDT's value for that method (fingeprint, facescan, age, height etc etc) any fraudster will have a whole heap of questions to answer, as well as suffer denial of services.

This is even assuming someone has the nano-tech to re-embed in the 1st place. The data itself will be paired and encapsulation with an assigned UniD, and avail of blockchain Azure encryption and for each and every data packet request.

I.e. If you think it's a bit like photocoping someone elses driving licence before a rake about in the GTi, well think again.

OK so they need some biotech to verify the tattoo?? What's the point of the tattoo then?

EyesClosed wrote: »

OK so they need some biotech to verify the tattoo?? What's the point of the tattoo then?

Wrong again, to create (write) the tatto would require more than an Epson printer. To read it would require simple technology, factoring in the various levels of security at each stage of request (often user controlled).

EyesClosed wrote: »

Also I'm still not sure what the conspiracy is exactly.... Bill Gates is gonna vaccinate everyone (which is good)... And also give us all tattoos....is that it?

1. Digital IDs for everyone (it's in the title).
2. Technologies to assist in a new unique technology to assist in the process of a new DigitalID platform, ideally for 7bn people

As we all know id2020 are a 50:50 mix of vaccine programs (GAVI) and technology identifer technologies (MSoft/Accenture), and big funders (Gates& Rockerfellas). Throw COVID19 in the mix, and we have perfect conditions.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Wrong again, to create (write) the tatto would require more than an Epson printer. To read it would require simple technology, factoring in the various levels of security at each stage of request (often user controlled).

1. Digital IDs for everyone (it's in the title).
2. Technologies to assist in a new unique technology to assist in the process of a new DigitalID platform, ideally for 7bn people

As we all know id2020 are a 50:50 mix of vaccine programs (GAVI) and technology identifer technologies (MSoft/Accenture), and big funders (Gates& Rockerfellas). Throw COVID19 in the mix, and we have perfect conditions.

But a digital id to help track covid isn't a conspiracy... Its well known some form of id is needed after a vaccine which is also needed.

So your conspiracy is what will the id be??

EyesClosed wrote: »

But a digital id to help track covid isn't a conspiracy... Its well known some form of id is needed after a vaccine which is also needed.

id2020.org's aim is for the entire world to have a DigitalID. This isn't a passing thought to last a few months.

Also it's not to 'track the covid'. It's a new best of class soloution for what are known as: immunity passports. If you reckon some App on a phone can perfrom this certification down in timbuktu and the slums of Nepal, think again.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

id2020.org's aim is for the entire world to have a DigitalID. This isn't a passing thought to last a few months.

Also it's not to 'track the covid'. It's a new best of class soloution for what are known as: immunity passports. If you reckon some App on a phone can perfrom this certification down in timbuktu and the slums of Nepal, think again.

So what's your conspiracy?
Bill Gates is gonna track use the covid vaccine to give us all tattoos.... To be able to control us all?

EyesClosed wrote: »

So what's your conspiracy?

Not saying your slow, but are you a bit slow?
Anyway have other things to do than, repeat for the challenged.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Not saying your slow, but are you a bit slow?
Anyway have other things to do than, repeat for the challenged.

OK so you won't answer me... And you're insulting me... Nice

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

id2020.org's aim is for the entire world to have a DigitalID. This isn't a passing thought to last a few months.

Also it's not to 'track the covid'. It's a new best of class soloution for what are known as: immunity passports. If you reckon some App on a phone can perfrom this certification down in timbuktu and the slums of Nepal, think again.

Erm, quantum dot tattoos aren't a part of id2020's research and you've been told this plenty of times. There is multiple pilot schemes for it using the likes of retinas, fingerprints and qr codes. Not one scheme is using quantum dot tattoos...

The quantum dot tattoo sole focus has been around vaccine records in developing countries.

Deleted User wrote: »

Erm, quantum dot tattoos aren't a part of id2020's research and you've been told this plenty of times. .

Erm, QDT are BGates backed and funded (as you should know by now, and have been told already): id2020.org. Who are a vaccine and technology partnership, who's purpose is to push for 'Digital ID's for everyone' through the use of vaccine programs.

BG is directly linked to their founding and main partners: GAVI (vaccine alliance, which he funds) and Microsoft (who supply the Azure cloud verification stages, not to mention shared MIT medi-tech patents).

Indeed as BG has posiitoned himself as the self-appointed global vaccine man. It's an ideal and perfect partnership to this medi-tech partnership. His best case solution to the issue of vaccine immunity certificates is: the QuantumDotTattoo.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

His best case solution to the issue of vaccine immunity certificates is: the QuantumDotTattoo.

But ID 2020 doesn't say that.
It says it wants something persistant, birth to death and biometric.
Quantum Dot Tattoos are none of those things.

You keep having weird bouts of amnesia.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Erm, QDT are BGates backed and funded (as you should know by now, and have been told already): id2020.org. Who are a vaccine and technology partnership, who's purpose is to push for 'Digital ID's for everyone' through the use of vaccine programs.

BG is directly linked to their founding and main partners: GAVI (vaccine alliance, which he funds) and Microsoft (who supply the Azure cloud verification stages, not to mention shared MIT medi-tech patents).

Indeed as BG has posiitoned himself as the self-appointed global vaccine man. It's an ideal and perfect partnership to this medi-tech partnership. His best case solution to the issue of vaccine immunity certificates is: the QuantumDotTattoo.

Provide proof that there is any plan to use this beyond vaccines. Provide proof that it's as close to release as you claim rather than being years away from it. Provide proof that he intends for 7 billion people to be given it.

Also you've indicated that quantum dot is the best solution.... It's the solution that suits your conspiracy. It's one of many pieces of research into the topic that he's funding. It's also highly unlikely to go to market any time soon, certainly not for 7 billion people.

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Provide proof that there is any plan to use this beyond vaccines. Provide proof that it's as close to release as you claim rather than being years away from it. Provide proof that he intends for 7 billion people to be given it.

Also you've indicated that quantum dot is the best solution.... It's the solution that suits your conspiracy. It's one of many pieces of research into the topic that he's funding. It's also highly unlikely to go to market any time soon, certainly not for 7 billion people.

Be prepared to be slammed with the same copy/paste tactics he has used throughout the thread.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Be prepared to be slammed with the same copy/paste tactics he has used throughout the thread.

Followed by telling me that I know nothing about "komputers"... Slowly working my way towards specialising entirely in azure services so I feel I can definitely pass comment...

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Followed by telling me that I know nothing about "komputers"... Slowly working my way towards specialising entirely in azure services so I feel I can definitely pass comment...

The weird spelling .... Komputers:rolleyes:

Deleted User wrote: »

Provide proof that there is any plan to use this beyond vaccines..

Beyond, what 7,000,0000,000 vacccines (1st release), one for everyone?
How many more iterations would you need, lol.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

The weird spelling .... Komputers:rolleyes:

As some folks don't have a baldy of basic technology, calling them komputers is taking the wee somewhat, this is probably how they pronounce computer anyhow.

You have an issue with this? Must be some slow day in your basement lad. :rolleyes:

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Beyond, what 7,000,0000,000 vacccines (1st release), one for everyone?

You've yet to show anything about bill gates wanting 7 billion anything.

You are now entering the phase where you throw out rather silly and childish insults.
I believe this is because you are getting annoyed that your theory is being torn apart and rightly mocked.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

As some folks don't have a baldy of basic technology, calling them komputers is taking the wee somewhat, this is probably how they pronounce computer anyhow.

You have an issue with this? Must be some slow day in your basement lad. :rolleyes:

Says the "lad" who is only heading outside now after a few hours of posting nonsense. My days work is done kiddo, currently enjoying a nice coffee in the park with a good book.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Beyond, what 7,000,0000,000 vacccines (1st release), one for everyone?
How many more iterations would you need, lol.

Being used as a far broader digital id outside of simply identifying what vaccines a person has received. It's also primarily being considered for developing countries.

Also, you're claiming it's gonna be delivered to 7 billion people as part of a covid vaccine? Firstly, nobody would release something on day one to 7 billion people. Secondly, there's zero indication that this is remotely production ready so no, it won't be with the covid vaccine. Eg the birth control thing you referenced had a predicted release of 2018(it didn't make it) . Has the quantum dot even got a predicted release date? Surely the definitive solution that you've described it as, should have such info readily available.

King Mob wrote: »

You've yet to show anything about bill gates wanting 7 billion anything.

eh?

Vaccines for a start (7bn thereof).

Hello? knock knock...

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Says the "lad" who is only heading outside now after a few hours of posting nonsense. My days work is done kiddo, currently enjoying a nice coffee in the park with a good book.

Says the lad (relaxing on a park bench, with a coffee in hand, book in the other, yet can be found **** across de boards), very good :pac:

As an interesting factoid, the last time you claimed to be on a park bench (for hours) was directly against your own state's recomendations. Tut, tut.

An now as it happens, the NW of Eng is staring at the (r) figure of at or close to 1.0. Perhaps only the SW area have it as bad. Ah well.

Deleted User wrote: »

Surely the definitive solution that you've described it as, should have such info readily available.

Am not directly involved with the production of such a technology, strange thing to assume.

Anyway... The folks at id2020 wanted their new DigitalID platform rolled out for 2030, the COVID will likely speed this date. But still has plenty of flexibility also.

BillGF was funding (with $bn's) the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine candidates in the US, will only used the best 2 for the vaccines. This leaves spare capacity for other medi-tech production.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Am not directly involved with the production of such a technology, strange thing to assume.

Anyway... The folks at id2020 wanted their new DigitalID platform rolled out for 2030, the COVID will likely speed this date. But still has plenty of flexibility also.

BillGF was funding (with $bn's) the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine candidates in the US, will only used the best 2 for the vaccines. This leaves spare capacity for other medi-tech production.

You're saying 'likely with no actual basis. A timeline for 2030 means it's incredibly unlikely that it could be remotely be ready within the next two years. You also haven't provided proof of your 7 billion people claim. Your points simply don't stand up to basic scrutiny...

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Says the lad (relaxing on a park bench, with a coffee in hand, book in the other, yet can be found **** across de boards), very good :pac:

As an interesting factoid, the last time you claimed to be on a park bench (for hours) was directly against your own state's recomendations. Tut, tut.

An now as it happens, the NW of Eng is staring at the (r) figure of at or close to 1.0. Perhaps only the SW area have it as bad. Ah well.

And your point is?

Deleted User wrote: »

You also haven't provided proof of your 7 billion people claim. Your points simply don't stand up to basic scrutiny...

Are you claiming Bill does not want a COVID vaccine rolled out to everyone on the planet? (7 billion, give or take a few).

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Says the lad (relaxing on a park bench, with a coffee in hand, book in the other, yet can be found **** across de boards), very good :pac:

As an interesting factoid, the last time you claimed to be on a park bench (for hours) was directly against your own state's recomendations. Tut, tut.

An now as it happens, the NW of Eng is staring at the (r) figure of at or close to 1.0. Perhaps only the SW area have it as bad. Ah well.

I liked your use of the word factoid.

The meaning of which is:
an item of unreliable information that is reported and repeated so often that it becomes accepted as fact.

So basically everything you think bill gates is going to do is a factoid.