Sam Russell wrote: » Exactly, plus the PPP (Privatise the Public Purse) also transfers risk to the public purse while passing the profit to the private part. If it goes pear shaped the private part can walk away. It was only a wheeze to help political friends and supporters.
serfboard wrote: » I'd be all for splitting it too, although I'd do it differently: 1. Patrickswell to Banoge north. The existing good section of road which I would do last. 2. Banoge north to Mallow North. A 40km section from the end of the existing Croom bypass to Mallow, bypassing both Charleville and Buttevant. The part of the road in most desperate need of being done, from a safety and congestion point of view. 3. Mallow to Blarney. Although this section carries the most traffic, I would still do it second, since the safety benefits of the previous section make it priority, IMO, and this section is not as bad.
serfboard wrote: » PPP schemes never make sense, IMO. It's borrowing (in the sense that we have an obligation to repay) that we pretend is not borrowing, and which we pay more for.
Sam Russell wrote: » a PPP scheme would make no sense at the moment.
Pete_Cavan wrote: » It should have been split into sections years ago. The upgrade of 2+1 between Mallow and Cork has to happen anyway for safety reasons and wont be overly expensive, get that done first. South of Mallow to north of Buttevant is easily justifiable on traffic and safety grounds. At that stage, extending up to Patrickswell is a no brainer.
Deleted User wrote: » I can't see the M20 getting passed the green unless its broken into a few sections, at least get some of it done or planning for it.
alias no.9 wrote: » A sleight of hand might come in the form of a PPP where the state incurs little capital expense or spreads it over an extended period
[Deleted User] wrote: » Likely the strokestown bypass will be ready for construction next year. I can't see the M20 getting passed the green unless its broken into a few sections, at least get some of it done or planning for it.
marno21 wrote: » It’s unlikely that any large spending on the M20 apart from land purchase will take place in the lifetime of this Government. Then again, there are few shovel ready public transport projects to soak up all the funding either so we’ll have to wait and see how this 2:1 ratio stuff works out.
Leonard Hofstadter wrote: » I'd love to believe this is true but the Programme for Government has no specific commitments on any roads being built. With a 2:1 spend on public transport as a bare minimum, it would want to be one heck of a budget to get the M20 done along with roads maintenance.
Reputable Rog wrote: » Reading the Business Post yesterday, they were reporting that the M20 will go ahead.
Sam Russell wrote: » How far is that? (Limerick to just before Killonan) I was looking at Google maps, but the photo quality is abysmal. It does not look as though the alignment allows for double tracking, but it is difficult to tell. Also there are lots of level crossings.
marno21 wrote: » It’s double track from Limerick to just before Killonan Junction where the line to Ballybrophy diverges It’s single beyond that to Limerick Junction
Sam Russell wrote: » Is the line from Limerick Junction to Limerick single track? If it is, it would need to be double tracked, or at least it needs to have passing loops added.
Isambard wrote: » mikeym wrote: » Whats the point in building a railway line from Limerick to Cork when technically both Cities can be accessed by going through Limerick Junction. It's a pipe dream, I've said it before but a decent service, Cork to Limerick, interchanging with other routes at the Junction would be far better value, much cheaper and could be instigated almost immediately. Is the line from Limerick Junction to Limerick single track? If it is, it would need to be double tracked, or at least it needs to have passing loops added.
mikeym wrote: » Whats the point in building a railway line from Limerick to Cork when technically both Cities can be accessed by going through Limerick Junction. It's a pipe dream, I've said it before but a decent service, Cork to Limerick, interchanging with other routes at the Junction would be far better value, much cheaper and could be instigated almost immediately.
spacetweek wrote: » Developed countries should have good quality road and rail, not road or rail. A lot of the discussion on this thread is very adversarial, all people arguing against one and for the other. Many of the people using an improved (I agree HSR is overkill) railway won't be commuters so location of industrial estates is irrelevant. As for UL, in any properly run city a destination 1-2 km from the centre would be reachable by bus in a matter of minutes. Not in Ireland.
Cookiemunster wrote: » The fasted route possible is via car and that won't change if you have to drive to a P&R, then get the train to Kent or Colbert Stations and then get a bus to your final destination. The vast majority of people commuting to Limerick don't work anywhere near the city center as seen by the M7 around the city having 50K journeys every day