challengemaster wrote: » Unsure why people think the digital version will be the cheaper & stripped down version of the two. I'd actually expect the opposite. I'd say the digital version will get the larger 1.65Tb SSD , the disc version gets the 865Gb SSD - That's what gives Sony the best monetary outcome here, people who want more games and the bigger hard drive get pushed towards digital only purchases and diminishes the resale market. It also just makes sense - give the larger hard drive to the people who will download all their games.
Varik wrote: » Not used prime lately but Amazon have gotten abysmally slow for normal delivery to Ireland, takes them a week to even ship it the order let alone the time it take to get here. If you were going Amazon you'd probably be better ordering using prime to Parcel motel or Address pal. If I'd to guess I'd say Parcel motel as they're in the North so it'll be in the north launch day and maybe at a locker that evening.
shaveAbullock wrote: » Do UHD Blu Rays sell well? It's mostly streaming services now and I know you need at least 25Mbit internet to stream UHD but people with slower internet seem happy enoung with 1080p.
challengemaster wrote: » I don't think I could name a single person that I know who's bought a Blu Ray since they came out, I really can't see it being as big a deciding factor as you're making out on here. Especially with 4k streaming on multiple platforms now. DVD sales dropped nearly 90% in the last 15 years. Blu Ray only makes up about $1bn of the $25bn market share of media consumption, and 4k bluray is only 5% of all physical media sales. There's nowhere near sizable enough to even be a consideration.
Dayjur wrote: » How will you play your backwards compatible discs without a drive? the digital version is pointless
challengemaster wrote: » You must be having a laugh, latest leak showing $699 price point
ziggyman17 wrote: » a lot of people will buy the disc version so they can also play their 4k movies as well as play games, I can see the disc version being the biggest seller........
JimBurnley wrote: » Do we know if you'll be able to plug in an external hard drive for more storage like the ps4?
martyos121 wrote: » Haven’t bought a PS4 disc in about three years I’d say so I’ll be very tempted by a digital only model if the price difference is big enough. You’d hope the only thing missing from that one is the disc drive, and that they don’t strip other features too to lower the cost.
SureYWouldntYa wrote: » Will they tell us the PS5 is gonna be so good we'll want to work extra hours to be able to afford it?
[Deleted User] wrote: » I think the no-disc model will be sold at a loss to hit an attractive price. Maybe $399 ? Then the with-disc model will be sold at $499... maybe that's a break even price. I really cannot see a $600 system based on their history with PS3. Personally I have no interest in all-digital. Half my PS4 library are physical.
Deleted User wrote: » I think the no-disc model will be sold at a loss to hit an attractive price. Maybe $399 ? Then the with-disc model will be sold at $499... maybe that's a break even price. I really cannot see a $600 system based on their history with PS3.
Wing126 wrote: » Where did ye get this info?
WarZoneBrother wrote: » Isn't the manufacturing costs 450dollars though as opposed to the ps3 which was 830dollars?
EoinHef wrote: » Givin the hardware I didn't think it was ever going to be cheap. I still think it could be somewhere between €600-700. Then between €50-100 less for the model with no disc drive