zpehtsfd wrote: » He turned around and fired it directly at the PO when he was fleeing. All caught on video.
lawrencesummers wrote: » Resigned not fired.
Nozebleed wrote: » some people refuse to believe there is a problem with crime when it comes to african american community. this is where the real problem is...sad but its the truth.
frag420 wrote: » Because he wasn't driving, he was sleeping in his car. Why didnt the police officer shout "freeze, we will shoot" or similar before shooting him as a normal civilised police force who are there to PROTECT and SERVE should do?
joe40 wrote: » If the only other option is killing him absolutely. That is what other police forced do. The PSNI in the north are all armed. Every one of them. When have you ever heard story like that coming from the north. Derry and Belfast have their fair share of ****head's.Some people just refuse to accept there is a problem with American policing and this is a good example. This sort of crime happens in every European country, only in America does it result in death. This affects all communities as well, not just black.
Gretas Gonna Get Ya! wrote: » What I meant is he should have discussed it slowly and calmly before cuffing him... the man was drunk and probably a bit scared. They just said, "we're gonna cuff you now", and proceeded to put his hands behind his back. I think that was too abrupt for the situation and the current climate. The man got spooked by getting cuffed... he probably wasn't expecting it.
Friday’s shooting came after police were called to the Wendy’s over reports that Brooks had fallen asleep in the drive-thru line. Officers attempted to take him into custody after he failed a field sobriety test, according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.
frag420 wrote: » Do we know he fired a taser? Maybe it was the taser that the police had fired at him that was now obsolete and thus even less of a threat than normal? Aren't tasers meant to be non lethal, why use lethal force against something that is non lethal, eps when there are two of you there with lethal weapons?
Nozebleed wrote: » you seem to believe he was taken out. who's to say the officer who shot him wasn't aiming at his shoulder,arm,leg or whatever other part of the body that would stop the guy from leaving the scene. why didnt the guy just accept he was wrong,admit drink driving and get in the police car. like normal civilised folk do?
Ardent wrote: » I see the Atlanta police chief has been fired as well. Probably easier for the mayor to scapegoat, bow to cancel culture and preserve her political career than to protect her police department. New black Atlanta police chief in 3...2...1...
zpehtsfd wrote: » Firing
Peintre Celebre wrote: » So if the police know who the person is, they should just let people away when resisting arrest because they can go and get him again?
walshb wrote: » No. He completely lost his ****. The slating of cops here is ludicrous.. Shoulda this, shoulda that....they are the cops. Not you. They are the ones in the line of fire here... It’s getting ridiculously out of hand here with people attacking police at every turn.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » But he wasn’t JUST running away. The Wendy’s CCTV clearly shows he turned back towards the cop and fired a taser at him. I have no problem discussing the cops handling of this but, laurencesummers, you are blatantly lying in your posts here. You really need more practice is twisting narrative to suit your agenda.
zpehtsfd wrote: » The cop clearly states that he is going to cuff him before putting them on. Putting his hands behind his back and cuffing him is normal procedure for a DUI. The question you should be asking is why he decided to resist arrest. He had absolutely no reason to fear for his life and knew full well that resisting would put him in a worse position with the cops. To say you can't really blame him for resisting is absolute nonsense.
frag420 wrote: » So does a turnip if thrown hard enough, whats your point? Also according to the US Police they use tasers because they are meant to be non lethal, they are not meant to kill. Why shoot someone with a non lethal weapon, seems excessive no?
lawrencesummers wrote: » [PHP][/PHP] The shooting or the firing?
walshb wrote: » Ok, if established he was running away with no gun in his possession, then this does seem rash and excessive..
Rodin wrote: » The mindset that Im just going to stand there and let a guy tase me?
zpehtsfd wrote: » In your opinion was that justified?
McDermotX wrote: » For optics. The only 'game' in town right now.
lawrencesummers wrote: » Yet he was fired...
Nozebleed wrote: » this was no execution..police officers were 100% in the right. the victim assaulted an officer and took his taser..which can kill..it has the potential to be a deadly weapon. the other officer probably had no idea if the perp had the gun or the taser and acted correctly..in self defence. nothing to do with racism.. the problem here is not the police officer. its the african american man's attitude toward authority.