derekshelvin wrote: » Humans co-exist with plenty of other species without the risk of disease and noise pollution brought by seagulls.
derekshelvin wrote: » I'm not calling for a cull, I'm just pointing out that we need to come up with some measures to scale back on their growing population in the city.
Storm 10 wrote: » They are only a vermin because that's what they have been turned into by overfishing, years ago you would not say that when they would only be seen at the seaside. They would be part and parcel of it, now they are in Cities trying to survive its not their fault .
John_Rambo wrote: » They're not serious injuries, my kids have had more painful weaver fish, jellyfish and a wasp stings, we can't and shouldn't eradicate wildlife because of a bloody lip. It's not like wildlife management in Africa, America or Borneo.
[Deleted User] wrote: » No one is suggesting eradication, but if you don't think they are out of control then you are either sitting in the middle of Meath and don't see any, Or are a fool.
Storm 10 wrote: » I don't know how many times I have to say that we are the problem not the Sea Gulls there is no food for them in the sea what do you suggest they do starve. Of all wild life they are the most effected by overfishing there is no fish even trawlers are tied up not worth going out to sea.
derekshelvin wrote: » I genuinely didn't mean to upset anyone, I am just a bit frustrated that I am paying taxes to fund a council who gets up every morning to clean our streets and try to keep our nice city as beautiful as it is while someone then spends the day pouring porridge oats around at every corner feeding animals that are causing so much noise and potential diseases. All I am suggesting are some local measures (e.g. fines for throwing food around or warning signs like other cities have) that might help. I just took a walk through town and the streets are destroyed with those oats and bird dropping all around them, I hadn't realised someone was doing this. Those who are living near this issue will know what I am talking about.
GrumpyMe wrote: » https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/dublin-s-night-workers-in-38-years-i-d-never-seen-an-owl-in-the-city-centre-1.4268886 Sean-Michael Larkin, an inspector on the night shift for Dublin City Council, has never seen the city so empty in more than three decades cleaning the city.... Instead of seeing people, he’s seeing wildlife. “The seagulls are gone because the fast food restaurants are closed . . . and because the seagulls are gone, the foxes have come back in.
Deleted User wrote: » No one is suggesting eradication, but if you don't think they are out of control then you are either sitting in the middle of Meath and don't see any, Or are a fool.
Hairy Japanese BASTARDS! wrote: » Why the fuçk are seagulls protected ? They're a pest and must be eradicated.
Storm 10 wrote: » I don't know how many times I have to say that we are the problem not the Sea Gulls there is no food for them in the sea what do you suggest they do starve.
LuasSimon wrote: » You better be careful or there will be a seagullslivesmatter protest outside your house , stay quite about this matter is your best bet in Modern Ireland !
Paddico wrote: » They are a delicacy in some Scottish Islands. Lets shoot and eat them instead.
Doctors room ghost wrote: » Release a lock of buzzards in town and May the strongest survive. It’s a wonder they don’t have some sort of ultrasonic sound machine that drives them off and is inaudible to humans like the similar ones for rats
skinny90 wrote: » More hawks would be the most humane way to deal with this I think.
TheBoyConor wrote: » That would also drive off all other wildlife and probably be a menace to people's pets. The solution is to stop fishing.
TheBoyConor wrote: » Good luck with that except the farmers will lay poison to kill the hawks because they think that hawks and eagles fly off with fully grown cattle
TheBoyConor wrote: » Cars with obscured/dirty number plates, not visible because of another car or street furninture in the way etc.
TheBoyConor wrote: » Do you have any idea how much money it would cost to install, operate and maintain such a network of CCTV cameras? It would be railed against as being draconian over-surveilance that even the East German stasi couldn't mobilise. And it won't work. Cars with obscured/dirty number plates, not visible because of another car or street furninture in the way etc. Nonsense proposal like most things proposed on this site. As for enforcing fines against people who throw scraps of food around - how do you propose that to work? We haven't enough gardai to deal with domestic violence, buglaries, rural and elderly crime - they are hardly going to be going around dishing out fines and going to court with fellas who threw a chip or an apple core on the road. As for litter wardens, they are useless. They are not Gardai. A person could simply refuse to talk to them, give their name as John Johnson of John's Street, Johnstown, or tell them to feck off and there would be literally nothing they could do.
derekshelvin wrote: » What about the education angle I suggested; informing people / signs in public outlining the negatives of dumping food, how do you feel about that? I am trying to figure out whether or not you think this is a lost cause that will inevitably get worse without attempting some local measures. Some excellent suggestions made above this post.
?Cee?view wrote: » Around town as well, there's that lady that leaves food out for birds. For a good while, I thought it was vomit I was seeing until I realised she throws large amounts of what looks like porridge oats, which gets wet. I believe the poor woman has mental health issues and doesn't take kindly to being asked to stop the feeding.