Whelo79 wrote: » My point exactly. I'd still take his word over random internet stranger with absolutely zero insight. You can't back up your argument by asking have you any other proof other than what Dana said, when you have absolutely zero proof yourself. Like I said, take a breath and think before posting.
dave1982 wrote: » Oh yeah Dana's totally honest 100% time Case closed Thanks for your words of wisdom. If dana said it its true
Whelo79 wrote: » President of UFC says Vs random dude on internet says. I know who I'd tend to believe first. Some people really need to stop and take a breath before they post their nonsense!
dave1982 wrote: » Have you anything other than dana said?
eagle eye wrote: » So this is your conspiracy theory or do you have proof?
dave1982 wrote: This oh I'm not a replacement fighter is to save face. Its story himself and dana cooked up
eagle eye wrote: » Let's make this clear. Dana said Conor would be a replacement if either Tony or Khabib didn't make it. Conor said no that he's not a replacement fighter. When Khabib pulled out Conor was not offered the fight.
begbysback wrote: Because he said he's not a replacement fighter?
dave1982 wrote: » Dana said Conor was offered the fight but said no so Justin got it. If conor took the fight he'd be in Justin's position. So obviously conor is demanding to overstep Justin but Dana's saying no. Conor threw toys outta pram and retired Ariel reckons conor got upset over comments broadcast team made after nunes fight says she's first dual champion in history to defend title.
dave1982 wrote: Dana said Conor was offered the fight but said no so Justin got it. If conor took the fight he'd be in Justin's position. So obviously conor is demanding to overstep Justin but Dana's saying no. Conor threw toys outta pram and retired
AlmightyCushion wrote: » When you lose a belt, they don't take it from you. You still keep your belts. All former champs still have their belts (unless they got rid of them). When you get stripped of a belt you still keep the belt, you just aren't the champion any more. McGregor still has both his belts despite him being stripped of them.
eagle eye wrote: » It was a very close fight but at worst it was a draw. Round 3 was a clear 10-8 to Nate which wasn't given as a 10-8 by two judges.
Mellor wrote: » How is it 2016 again?
eagle eye wrote: » I wouldn't argue if you have round 2 to Nate or Conor, it was very close. The key round was 3. Nate completely dominated. If you remember it looked like the referee was strongly contemplating stopping it. That was a definite 10-8 in the eyes of any reasonable person or judge. Draw or Nate win would have been hard to argue with, Conor win was a wrong and maybe even currupt decision.
eagle eye wrote: » I wouldn't argue if you have round 2 to Nate or Conor, it was very close. The key round was 3. Nate completely dominated. If you remember it looked like the referee was strongly contemplating stopping it. That was a definite 10-8 in the eyes of any reasonable person or judge.
eagle eye wrote: » Draw or Nate win would have been hard to argue with
eagle eye wrote: » , Conor win was a wrong and maybe even currupt decision.
akelly02 wrote: The nate fight was a pretty obvious ud win for mcgregor he clearly won rds 1,2 and 4 nate won 3 and 5 not much more to it really
Queasy Tadpole wrote: » Aldo was a fluke. Give me your arguments against. It was a flash KO. Aldo bought into the hype. Alvarez was the same, I don't think that fight was a fluke win I think Alvarez bought into the McGregor hype train and was not mentally prepared for the fight. On skill I believe Alvarez to be the better fighter. His win to take the 145lb belt was a fluke. He was then gifted a shot at 155lbs and fought a man who mentally crumbled under the McGregor train. A perfect storm. He's a con artist of the highest order. Khabib showed him to be exactly what he is, a charlatan scumbag. Let him fight Poirier or Ferguson and see how well he does. He is no where near top 5, barley makes top 10 in my view.
yourdeadwright wrote: » They used to give you a new belt for every win as champion but with the new style belt I believe they add a stone (not sure what kind) to it each time you defend the belt,
eagle eye wrote: » What was the belt he was carrying at the press conference with Khabib then?
Mellor wrote: April 7th 2018 After he pulled out of the fight with Khabib, and Khabib was awarded the 155 title. Tony hasn’t been interim for over 2 years.
Mellor wrote: » Tony was only ahead of him because he jumped him. By the above logic, Conor is owed his fight with both. If you apply that logic for one, it should be for all. As you said, it’s a draw at best. Even with the most bias scoring. But 3rd was nowhere near a 10-8 by the actual definition. If 3rd was a 10-8, so was the 2nd with 2 knockdowns.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wa.vanillicon.com/v2/a605da6df673e065ac5a7e976411f425.svg)
