JohnnyFlash wrote: » You spend 16 hours a day on this website religiously defending a party you claim you 1st voted for in the last general election. The patsy label could be applied both ways tbh.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Ever think you were being played for a patsy?
markodaly wrote: » So again, when push comes to shove you run away from presenting any pertinent facts to bolster your argument. You do not know the difference between Central Government and Local Government You cannot tell the difference between SDCC and DCC You deny that SF had a pact with other parties giving them control in DCC from 2014-2019 You deny that FG is not in power in DCC at present. When asked for explicit evidence to your points, you run away with some airy-fairy ad-hominem thrown out there. You fail to answer basic questions. As Eamon Dunphy has said many a time about football players, "Ya got found out tonight!"
blanch152 wrote: » The hurt being displayed by Shinnerbots on Twitter, and the increasingly bitter contributions are actually becoming enjoyable.
blanch152 wrote: » Just to show how silly Bowie's posts are, here is a report of the most recent election of Lord Mayor in Dublinhttps://www.thejournal.ie/fianna-fail-tom-brabazon-lord-mayor-5020132-Feb2020/ "Brabazon received votes from his own party, as well as councillors from the Green Party, Labour and the Social Democrats, under the ‘Dublin Agreement’, which saw the four parties come together to form a council majority after local authority elections last year." Bowie seems to be completely unaware of the practice of coalitions at local level controlling councils. It is quite surprising. I have never seen anything like it before on here.
Bowie wrote: » Mark you are trying to have a different discussion. That's you running away. FG Councillors have no say in council decisions you said. FG has no say in the allocation of social housing you said. SF and PBP, (with 1 or 2 Councillors) run the DCC you said. This is all baloney. that's it.
frw5 wrote: » Dont forget not providing an update to rent freeze, although its due to expire in 2 weeks and rents for July are almost due. People cant plan is it the increased rate or the frozen one.
blanch152 wrote: » A gibberish response in all honesty. Here is what he said: There is nothing untrue in what he said. Do you agree with him or not? Or are there "alternative" facts that you wish to present?
dundalkfc10 wrote: » CSO statistics out today, since 2018 the number of 18-24 who have a "high" level of wellbeing has fallen from 48.8% to 10%. Basically 9 out of 10 young Irish people are not happy.
Bowie wrote: » You are ignoring my critique of Marko's nonsense and his nonsense itself. As it stands, FG have no say on DCC despite their number of FG councilors. FG have no say on social housing allocation despite government policy demanding it, in this Donnybrook case too, and the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Authorites being a Fine Gael man :rolleyes: It must be great to get the wages and have zero, nada responsibility. That's dem that don't want to work for ya. Wait for the 'sure that's millennials for ya something something Avocados'.
blanch152 wrote: » You can critique his opinion as much as you like, but you are denying facts. FACT 1: Fianna Fail brought in the legislation for Part V of the Planning Act FACT 2: Local authorities are responsible for implementing the provisions in relation to social housing FACT 3: Sinn Fein was part of a coalition in charge of Dublin City Council up until last year's local election. FACT 4: Fine Gael were not part of that coalition and are not part of the current coalition controlling Dublin City Council and are equivalent to an opposition party in the Dail FACT 5: Donnybrook is part of Dublin City Council not South Dublin County Council You got all of those facts wrong. There were numerous citations provided by Mark and others to back up these facts, but like a flat-earther, you continue to deny the clear evidence presented to you. Once you have accepted the facts, we can have a meaningful and informed discussion on the remaining elements that constitute opinion, but I don't engage with flat-earth debates.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I made about 3-4 in total posts today Johnny. Calm the ham there. Let blanch defend himself.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Well able to defend himself, Francie. Please don’t try to come up with that auld line of attack. Doesn’t butter any parsnips. The reality is out there.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I made about 34 in total posts today Johnny. Calm the ham there. Let blanch defend himself.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So poignant and plaintive Brendie. Reminds me of the those auld gung ho Blighty against the evil German black and white films. You have blanch's back. I has a tear in me eye.
StackSteevens wrote: » Thirty four posts!!!! Jesus, Francie, you're a nutjob! But who is laundering the diesel while you're busily tapping away furiously with your index finger?
RandomViewer wrote: » What's the story with the Gardai burning the car in the Lunny case?
Bishop of hope wrote: » A shinner Garda?
RandomViewer wrote: » 2 of the defendant's are from Dublin, I'd be thinking the other way, where a rabbit lives
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Interesting series of tweets here. The sort of facts and figures that don’t sit well with the oddballs, losers, and malcontents on Twitter.https://twitter.com/care2much18/status/1270496059861721097?s=21
Bishop of hope wrote: » It's a strange one RV. But there were lots of questions about the Gardai in the area during the whole Quinn saga and when DJ was around the area. Burned accidentally? Best I can offer is I doubt it was anything to do with FG or Charlie Flannigan
FrancieBrady wrote: » The files where going across the MoJ's desk Bish...ignored for 8 years until a man got seriously injured. Now a major piece of the evidence has been destroyed by those who ignored what was going on. How many reasons can you come up with for the security forces and MOJ ignoring serious breaches of the law?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Bit desperate to be slanderous there Stack. Always happens when argument and rebuttals are thin on the ground with you guys are
Bowie wrote: » Mark you are trying to have a different discussion. That's you running away. FG Councillors have no say in council decisions you said. FG has no say in the allocation of social housing you said. SF and PBP, (with 1 or 2 Councillors) run the DCC you said. .
Bowie wrote: » ANSWER 1: So what? Are FG beholden to FF policy from over a decade ago? Were FG grudgingly forced to keep this as policy? Does the government and housing, planning, LA minister have no responsibility for this government policy? Do you think government ministers say, 'listen this is the way it is, but that was Sean lemass brought that in'? ANSWER 2: True dat, 'implimenting'. I do not believe the numerous FG councilors have no say nor FG government have no say. ANSWER 3: 'in charge' is not accurate also what about PBP? It was claiming both SF and PBP ran DCC and FG had zero, nada, say on anything for years. ANSWER 4: See answer 3. ANSWER 5: So what? We are talking DCC numbers and government policy. I didn't my hole. see above. Now can we return to your running away when we discussed 'dem that don't want to work'? You gave a link to back up the numbers. However the link only showed levels of unemployment not numbers of dem that don't want to work. The spin we are to believe is Social housing is allocated to people who don't want to work therefore 25 year leases and hotels good, social housing bad. Then if said leases are in luxury D4 apartments, it's nothing to do with FG councilors or the FG government who's policy, (FF inking it does not take responsibility from government who use it), they merrily enforce, says a portion should be allocated as social housing. Give over lads you can't have it both ways. Either FG, the Councillors, party and housing, planning, LA Minister have zero, nada to do with housing or they do. I'd like to know how these no say do nothing councilors justify their salary and same goes for Eoghan do nothing, no responsibility Murphy. It's completely laughable the hoops you lads will slither through.
