The Raging Bile Duct wrote: » A case of trying to quell any sort of negative attention to stop it being added to the already massive amount of negativity surrounding the game.
Leroy42 wrote: » There is no negativity, well none that is rational at least, surrounding this game. People are generally really excited about its release, can't wait to see how they take the story on and what is next in store for Ellie and Joel. "I don't like the story line to a game I haven't played yet" compared to the actual pre-reviews which were almost universally positive and you could tell that they had really enjoyed the game. Do you even know what the law is around this type of song? Whether they have to give her credit? Even if they did, perhaps they just made a oversight, and have moved to correct it pretty quickly and the artist in question seems more than happy with the response.
The Raging Bile Duct wrote: » This forum has been pretty decent in terms of being able to talk about the game without getting the game spoiled.
Retr0gamer wrote: » I'd say the artist they hired plagarised the original cover and never disclosed that and caught Naughty Dog off guard.
The Raging Bile Duct wrote: » I'd be inclined to be a bit more cynical about it. As far as I can tell it's Ashley Johnson, who voices Ellie, singing the song.
Zero-Cool wrote: » I'd say this is most likely the case. Or someone suggested the cover, had legal team get the rights, legal only got rights for the original but told creative everything was sorted. Still lies with ND to stay on top of things like this but glad it's sortednow anyway.
Penn wrote: » It's definitely Ashley Johnson, but I think the claim is about the musical arrangement/tempo matching Lotte Kestner's previous cover version as opposed to New Order's (for obvious reasons). It's the kind of thing where there's almost no way to do a female acoustic slow version of that song without it sounding like that, but the fact there was a previous version and the new version sounds just like it, it's just not clear cut either way as to whether they copied it or not, so I'd say they just didn't think it was worth fighting either way.
sweetie wrote: » Warnig! Had this pre-ordered with GS and got a call asking of I'd like to cancel and instead order online for delivery as they are expecting big queues. Grand I said as long as there's no extra charge but when I went to use the voucher they gave me, they want an extra 6.50. Have sent a mail to CS so hopefully they'll resolve it.
RedRochey wrote: » First time preordering a game with Symths for delivery, so I should be getting it on the 18th? How does it work so I can't play it before the 19th?
sniper_samurai wrote: » If it is a disc copy you can play as soon as you get it, unlike digital.
Retr0gamer wrote: » Oh is it 2004 again and Day 1 patches don't exist? :pac:
deceit wrote: » I woke up to my first review of the game. A youtuber called Skillup. It seems to have a differing opinion on the game from the typical media outlets scores.https://youtu.be/GB20A8CitRU
Deleted User wrote: » "More terminally, the story of the game is a complete mess, forgoing any of the themes, relationships and tones that were central to the first game, and replacing them with a petty revenge story, driven by unlikeable characters making decisions that seem ridiculous and unbelievable."