Mad_maxx wrote: » the " how is the weather up there " jokes dont bother me at all , i joke about my own height to other people but you do get tired of it being brought up all of the time , given the chance id much prefer be 5 ft 11 , there is no advantage to being very tall no matter what anyone outside the NBA tells you and countless disadvantages . add to that , i never found tall girls anymore attractive in the first place
cj maxx wrote: » I'll always remember at my granny's wake all these cousins of my mother doing my head in with them and who walks in only a guy about 6'8"+.Never so glad to see anyone.
Mad_maxx wrote: » while in a long term relationship , never once found my height of almost 6ft 5 to be an advantage with the opposite sex , i accept that a guy circa 6 ft 1 or thereabouts might be more desirable to a bloke who was 5 ft 4 but when you tower over most women , all they tend to see is someone who makes them strain their neck , didnt mean i never scored but guys who were less long certainly scored more as they had a better pick being tall is expensive , extra leg room required on planes , not to mention less comfort in most cars
Deleted User wrote: » My brain runs on metric but I think I am 5'4 in old money. Many things have helped and hindered me with girls/women but I do not feel height was ever one of them. Height wise I am in the middle in my relationship now. But back in my self hating days where I felt I was the victim and the world was against me - it was probably one of the many things I blamed for my own shortcomings. A bit like the OP seems to - I always latched onto any attribute that was out of my control that I could point to and say "See - those things are why I am doomed in life". Height. Skin Color. Virginity shaming. The OP is really filling out the bingo card of self-defeat of late. I see a lot of the old me in there.
[Deleted User] wrote: » So you could throw out some height jokes
Esel wrote: » Typo?
purifol0 wrote: » Yeah great, now go make a tinder account and list your height at five four for a week, then change it to six four for another week. I dont think I need to elaborate on the expected outcome. Height matters so much to women that they are perfectly happy to evaluate it before considering any other facet youve got ie money, status, career, personality,character, physique. People who claim it is not a factor or obsticle are very disengenous and this can be a lesson hard learned for young men. Why is it so hard for people to admit this?
SusieBlue wrote: » Do you not think men also have their own criteria of superficial dealbreakers too? Do you have any idea how many men have ‘no fatties need apply’ in their bios? It works both ways.
purifol0 wrote: » Yeah great, now go make a tinder account and list your height at five four for a week, then change it to six four for another week. I dont think I need to elaborate on the expected outcome.
purifol0 wrote: » Why is it so hard for people to admit this?
purifol0 wrote: » Statiscally you dead wrong about the match rates and mens dealbreakers, its also a very obvious false equivalance about being fat - its not genetic. Height is. And I very much doubt men write anything derogatory about women in their bios if they want to match anyone, at all.
Figel Narage wrote: » Yeah 100%, not only can you not be fat if you really want, lads will ignore it if it's not morbid obesity so to have this equivalence is just not the same
bitofabind wrote: » How do you know? Are you a woman interested in men and hanging out on dating apps? Always amuses me that the strongest opinions on these things always comes from heterosexual men that have fcuk all experience dating men themselves. Who know diddly squat about the experiences of women on dating apps besides something they saw on reddit or 'I know this female who X, Y and Z" statements. Men discriminate too. We all discriminate in dating. The difference is their dealbreakers tend to be things like weight and age, though height can come into it too. Try being a 6 foot something woman online. Or 5 '1 and 12 stone. Or 40+ in age. People cherry pick, often on things that wouldn't be "dealbreakers" in real life, because how else are you meant to narrow things down amid a sea of endless faces. It's online shopping, it's not real to most people.
Feisar wrote: » I used to have “anything less than DD’s need not apply” just as a dig at the height thing you see so much. Being 6’3” it didn’t matter to me I was being tongue in cheek
bitofabind wrote: » People cherry pick, often on things that wouldn't be "dealbreakers" in real life, because how else are you meant to narrow things down amid a sea of endless faces. It's online shopping, it's not real to most people.
kowloon wrote: » I reckon women are much more selective in general, it's human nature. How this translates to dating online I have no idea, but I expect men cast a much wider net. Then the waters are muddied further by men generally being the ones expected to make the first move and women being expected to be passive and merely filter out the men she has no interest in. When I was younger I thought it was much more difficult for guys having to do all the work and getting all the rejection but I've come to appreciate how awful it must be for a girl having to try and get a guy she likes to even notice her. The roles reversed and the guy can just straight up go for it and if he's shot down he can deal with it and move on.
Mad_maxx wrote: the " how is the weather up there " jokes dont bother me at all , i joke about my own height to other people but you do get tired of it being brought up all of the time , given the chance id much prefer be 5 ft 11 , there is no advantage to being very tall no matter what anyone outside the NBA tells you and countless disadvantages . add to that , i never found tall girls anymore attractive in the first place
sugarman wrote: » I cant get my head around anyone that would have a height restriction as a criteria for dating. Especially those "No under 6ft" types when the average Irish male is 5'10". Its just so trivial and theyre porbably missing out on genuine lads that tick all the other boxes. Just looking at someone I probably couldnt tell you their actual height. I certainly wouldnt be able to tell the difference between someone of 5'8" and 6ft.
Figel Narage wrote: » That's very true, we as guys are so used to rejection that it is something we just accept while if women have to approach a guy and are turned down it hurts them a lot purely down to the fact they don't have as much experience as we have. Again this is similar to the experiences I have seen and had growing up
Richard Hillman wrote: » I wouldn't go out with a woman that is taller than me and I guess ladies are the same. Some ladies would only go out with a guy if they are at least 3-4 inches taller. That's just a preference. I don't get the hullabaloo about it. I'm 5'6 so I'm obviously ruled out of a lot of ladies automatically, fair enough. I rule out ladies for lots of reasons too. That's the game. You win some, you lose some.
purifol0 wrote: » Sure it wont matter if its in jest and the girl gets the joke, but youll find plenty of non native english speakers (tonnes of brazillians) on tinder in Dublin and if you have jokes in your bio theres a good chance they wont understand it. They do however understand what 6' 3" means .
Esel wrote: » Yeah, they 'instinctively' know it means 190.5 cm.
mr_fegelien wrote: » I can see why Elliot Rodger went on his rampage...The guy never stood a chance. Anyway better to learn life is unfair earlier than later.