loyatemu wrote: » what type of bike is that from? I replaced a cup and cone style bracket like that with a cartridge style in an old mountain bike I had - just needed to match the size of the hole in the frame. The toughest bit was getting the old bracket out but you've done that.
cletus wrote: »
caviardreams wrote: » Thanks guys It's a Giant (Liv) Avail 2 2015 size medium - sorry I worded that badly by saying I got it recently - I got it 4 years ago but never really used it (mainly because of the twitchiness) so it feels brand new in my head it ended up indoors for the last 4 years after a few weeks of trying it and I only took it out again a few weeks ago and got it serviced. Trying to stick with it this time but it's not getting any easier steering wise and I've been out for an hour's cycle 9 or 10 times now. It feels best / most stable on the hoods but still very twitchy/slippy.https://www.liv-cycling.com/ie/avail-2-2015
Tony04 wrote: » ...that bb does look weird as crank bolt threading is male rather than female so if you get a new square Taper bb the crank might not necessarily be compatible.
Type 17 wrote: » Older/cheaper stuff was male-threaded with a nut like this (cheaper to make the spindle with external threads), but female-threaded spindle with a bolt is universal now because it tends not to come loose like the nut version. The taper is the same spec, so any square-taper crank that fits one spindle type will also fit the other.
Hairy Japanese BASTARDS! wrote: » The 3 gears at the pedal are selected based on gradient, 1 for going uphill to get power without necessarily speed, 2 for on the flat, 3 for downhill because it's "easier".
The back gears, 1-7, (derailer ??) are simply increased the faster you go. I'm probably miles off.
My late uncle had an unusual gear system on his, it was a little lever on the crossbar that you moved forward or back. I've never seen anything like it before.
Hairy Japanese BASTARDS! wrote: » What's the best way to select the optimal great? If my understanding is right and I'm open to being corrected.
ofthelord wrote: » Hi All, Can someone please tell me the name of the small round plastic cover that fits this hole? I only noticed the other day that the old plastic cover is missing and I'm guessing it is there to keep dust/dirt out so probably a good idea to replace it. I've run a few internet searches to identify the part name but have had no luck. Thanks.
seamus wrote: » Few things to check here
ofthelord wrote: » Hi All, A 2nd question that someone may also be able to help me with... I've identified the cause of an annoying clicking sound on my bike, it is one of the plastic entry points where the cabling going into the frame(it is the top one shown on image). Going over bumps this plastic part clicks(and there are a lot of bumps on the roads near me!). I'm not sure how to approach this, and I'm hopeful that someone here can point me to a simple fix for this? Thanks.
magicbastarder wrote: » what are people's thoughts on swapping front and back tyres around to maintain equal wear? note: neither tyre is heavily worn at all. front still has the mould line visible down the centre.
07Lapierre wrote: » Always better to have a good tyre on the front. Just buy a new tyre to replace the rear. Leave the existing front tyre where it is.
crosstownk wrote: » I'd be of this opinion also. Keep the best grip up front.
crosstownk wrote: » I'd be of this opinion also. Keep the best grip up front. That said, I usually replace tyres in pairs and keep the used front as an 'emergency' back up. I've loads of ex-front tyres in the shed.
magicbastarder wrote: » i would assume that a reasonably worn tyre would have the same grip levels as a new one, the issue i thought would be more to do with puncture protection/prevention.