gormdubhgorm wrote: » You would think that for many other countries. But it is America and Trump knows how to play to his audience. It got him the top job why change now?
looksee wrote: » I think that is just politically shrewd in his own head.
jaykay74 wrote: » I wonder if Donald welcomes/encourages the move away from Covid19 being the dominant force driving the news cycle to the current protests. I'm not saying its a good look for him but he might think its more familiar comfortable ground for him. Finally back to a conflict he can blame on weak Dem leadership etc. Might explain why he is more willing to fan the flames rather than show leadership to bring the country together (which he obviously has an inability to do anyway but he could at least try).
Deleted User wrote: » People have been shot at on their doorsteps... The behaviour of police atm is disgraceful atm and Trump is egging it on.
Tea drinker wrote: » Looters and violent extremists might get jail, while peaceful protestors are free to demonstrate without being tarnished by the actions of terrorist groups
Foxtrol wrote: » That is great to hear. LA obviously learning from their long history of issues. Saw last night it repeated over and over again that 1 in 7 of the arrests in NYC were from people from outside the area, when 40% of the NYPD dont live there. I'm sure when it gets to the south and smaller cities the numbers are even worse.
BonnieSituation wrote: » I was watching CBSN Los Angeles last night and there was a great interview done with the LA County Sheriff Villanueva and he was asked what's being done to stop these incidents happening and among measures including constant training and development LA County are not recruiting police officers/sheriffs from outside of the County so that the County policed by the people from the area. There's a lot to be said for that as a proactive measure on the face of it.
Foxtrol wrote: » There is no issue with cops not living in wealthy areas, because we aren't seeing them regularly harass and kill people in those communities. Your point on the less safe areas is true and one of the key problems. Many cops that have no connection to the community and wouldn't want their families near them just don't see those that live there as equals, instead something less than them. Mix that with the low bar to entry for the job, barely any training, and the ridiculous militarisation and we end up with what we're seeing over and over again.
Penn wrote: » CBS reporting that they have audio from Trump's call with some governors regarding the riotshttps://twitter.com/edokeefe/status/1267478663949357057?s=20https://twitter.com/edokeefe/status/1267478880820121603?s=20 If true, and that audio gets out.... I dread to think what's going to happen.
Manic Moran wrote: » In much of California, they quite simply can't afford to. San Jose Police HQ has a designated camping site for their officers to park their RVs to live in. Their starting salary is almost $90,000/year.https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/08/25/cops-living-in-rvs-outside-san-jose-police-department/ There's also a good argument that police are needed in less safe neighborhoods, and if they can afford a place to live which is safer, they will feel disinclined to raise their family where they're working. I find myself in agreement with Moon2. Part of me is wondering what the hell Trump is doing by not saying anything, and part of me is thinking that he's being strongly advised to shut the hell up right now and not make matters worse.
Mandatory overtime forces them to work up to 17-hour days. Combine those long hours with horrendous traffic, and commutes from as far away as Manteca, Stockton, Tracy and even Reno, these officers are staying in an RV during the week and then driving home on their days off.
Stallingrad wrote: » It's interesting yet not at all surprising to see Trump go into hiding. He has nothing to constructively add to what is happening by way of leadership or intellect. If he ad libs, with his usual limited vocabulary and myopic view of events it will be a train wreck. this issue is simply too complex and nuanced for him. Eventually teleprompter Trump will emerge and read off a speech someone has written for him that won't appear credible, as it will mention unity and working together to overcome differences, traits that Trump does not believe in. The US is crumbling and utterly rudderless, the worst that people feared has been exceeded.
Manic Moran wrote: » Part of me is wondering what the hell Trump is doing by not saying anything, and part of me is thinking that he's being strongly advised to shut the hell up right now and not make matters worse.
Foxtrol wrote: » For all the talk of outside agitators on the protesters side, few elected officials or the media want to discuss how a very small number of officers actually live in the neighborhoods they police.
Itssoeasy wrote: » Trump felt he'd look silly in a mask and it would be used by the press and his opponents in political ads, but that's now the least of his problems because now there is a picture of a completely dark White House which is an awful look in a time in America where they need leadership and the place that is supposed to symbolise that leadership is in darkness. I mean it's mana from heaven and you can guarantee the Lincoln project will have that in its next ad.
TomOnBoard wrote: » Rumours about widespread jamming in D.C. and video feeds having been cut were put out to add to confusion, fear and general destabilisation, I'd say. I don't think we can trust/believe anything from these rumour mills that are trying to add to the chaos. I have no doubt that the organised peaceful protests are being shadowed by extremely dangerous elements who are piggy-backing on those protests to further the anarchist agendas and simply to rob and loot whatever they can carry. It was very obvious that yesterday's mass looting in Santa Monica was organised and you could see the main organisers clearly acting as traffic controllers guiding looters with fully laden arms to waiting cars.
fullstop wrote: » There’s rumours of national guard, police, etc. turning the violence up a notch since, and some videos going around purporting to be the aftermath of police shooting people. Of course it could be just that, rumour, but who knows at this point? When you create the sort of clusterf*ck situation that trump has created with his handling of this, nobody knows what to believe. That confusion is probably good for him at this point.
moon2 wrote: » Bush *led* from there. Trump is, and has been, in incognito mode. It is arguable that saying and doing nothing is possibly the best contribution he could make right now.
Overheal wrote: » But Bush led from there. The most people criticize him for is the several minutes he was left seemingly stunned holding a children’s book.
StringerBell wrote: » What's the context for that? Trump hiding out and they are being overly cautious kinda thing jamming signals and cutting off cameras so that people can live stream or follow what's going to happen or what is happening or where secret service or whoever are etc?