nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FG to just do nothing for the next 5 years.

satguy

It seems FG will be very happy to just sit on their hands for 5 years. Would FG voters be happy with this, as it means all those FG votes mean nothing, and do nothing.

Having been in power for 9 years, they did nothing, people have no homes, people still on trollies.

FG may have given some of their rich buddies some tax breaks.

But other than that, they did what FG do best, are their poor hands not numb by now.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Colonel Claptrap

Bowie wrote: »

I think FF/FG/GP and the public would benefit from a removal of the current leadership. There's too much of a whiff of ego from MM/LV/ER. We need politicians not cartoon characters.

Damn those elites in leadership positions.

James Brown

Colonel Claptrap wrote: »

Damn those elites in leadership positions.

Is that your view of MM? Odd.
If we've to have another round of FG I'd rather it was with Coveney. Our politics may differ in some areas but he's more believable as a person.

StackSteevens

efanton wrote: »

https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/varadkar-martin-and-ryan-to-try-and-overcome-major-obstacles-encountered-in-talks-1002707.html

Well if the Green's will not back down on this it's possible we are looking at GE2

Hopefully!

As I see it, if the Greens get their way, then the members of FG (almost certainly) and of FF (quite possibly) are likely to vote against the agreed programme.

And if the Greens don't get their way, then their loonie left members are absolutely guaranteed to vote against it.

StackSteevens

Bowie wrote: »

I think FF/FG/GP and the public would benefit from a removal of the current leadership. There's too much of a whiff of ego from MM/LV/ER. We need politicians not cartoon characters.

And surely it's time for the Soc Dems to choose a leader too? I know that the two biddies like sharing the Leader's allowance, but it's time that they grew up.

James Brown

StackSteevens wrote: »

And surely it's time for the Soc Dems to choose a leader too? I know that the two biddies like sharing the Leader's allowance, but it's time that they grew up.

Why are they 'two biddies'? What about them do you think is damaging to the SD's and who do you think would be better in their stead?

Bishop of hope

efanton wrote: »

So why havent the governments over the last 20 years adjusted the rents?

I don't know? That's a question for the Govt in charge surely, not me.
There is little doubt of the concern over the housing issue though, even FG TD's are accepting that.
https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/fine-gael-td-disappointed-at-governments-housing-failures-1002864.html

Bishop of hope

Bowie wrote: »

I think FF/FG/GP and the public would benefit from a removal of the current leadership. There's too much of a whiff of ego from MM/LV/ER. We need politicians not cartoon characters.

Not disagreeing with your point, but funny the three you picked and your reference to them as cartoon characters.
I look at another party with an unmentioned leader and for some reason after reading your post Betty boop popped into my head, not sure why, not really a fair comparison, but she appeared in my subliminal window.

dundalkfc10

How's the keep Sinn Fein out of government at all costs going?

Bishop of hope

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

How's the keep Sinn Fein out of government at all costs going?

Good.
How's the Sinn Fein must be in Govt campaign going?

dundalkfc10

Bishop of hope wrote: »

Good.
How's the Sinn Fein must be in Govt campaign going?

Going just as good as the FFG campaign to try get anybody into bed with them, even the Greens are taking the piss outta you.

Wonder when MM will say **** it and decide SF be handy to be have after all, poor Leo won't know what to do

Bishop of hope

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Going just as good as the FFG campaign to try get anybody into bed with them, even the Greens are taking the piss outta you.

Lol, outta me?
We are all being taken for a ride, I know it.
You on the other hand are too, difference is you think it's only me or everyone else who isn't you, in the plural.

Brendan Bendar

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Going just as good as the FFG campaign to try get anybody into bed with them, even the Greens are taking the piss outta you.

Wonder when MM will say **** it and decide SF be handy to be have after all, poor Leo won't know what to do

Get ready for another spell on the sidelines, my friend.

dundalkfc10

Brendan Bendar wrote: »

Get ready for another spell on the sidelines, my friend.

Havnt had a spell on the sidelines yet, so what are you making up lies about?

Its getting too ya isnt it. The Govt talks you thought were in the bag a few weeks ago are falling apart

dundalkfc10

Bishop of hope wrote: »

Lol, outta me?
We are all being taken for a ride, I know it.
You on the other hand are too, difference is you think it's only me or everyone else who isn't you, in the plural.

No im with over 50% of the electorate who voted change. Plural or no plural

Bishop of hope

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

No im with over 50% of the electorate who voted change. Plural or no plural

So why aren't we getting it?
I'd suggest it's because you're with the 25% who think that's over 50%?

dundalkfc10

Bishop of hope wrote: »

So why aren't we getting it?
I'd suggest it's because you're with the 25% who think that's over 50%?

Il make it simple for you.

The last Govt was FG and a few indepenents. What % of the vote did they receive?

What % of the vote did FF, SF, Greens etc receive?

More people voted against the current Govt than for them.

Its a fact, you cannot say its not

StackSteevens

Bowie wrote: »

Why are they 'two biddies'? What about them do you think is damaging to the SD's and who do you think would be better in their stead?

Sorry pet, but my Boards.ie contract doesn't require me to do your thinking for you.

StackSteevens

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Going just as good as the FFG campaign to try get anybody into bed with them, even the Greens are taking the piss outta you.

Wonder when MM will say **** it and decide SF be handy to be have after all, poor Leo won't know what to do

"Poor Leo" will know exactly what to do:- go into opposition!

Which, I suspect, is exactly what a significant majority of the 20% of the electorate that voted for FG want the party to do.

I'm really looking forward to seeing the FG members' response to the dogs' dinner document that they'll shortly be invited to vote on; always assuming that the Greens' uncritical love for the intifada doesn't bring an early end to the talks.

Bishop of hope

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Il make it simple for you.

The last Govt was FG and a few indepenents. What % of the vote did they receive?

What % of the vote did FF, SF, Greens etc receive?

More people voted against the current Govt than for them.

Its a fact, you cannot say its not

The last Govt was a minority Govt anyway, didn't have 50% support, go figure!

dundalkfc10

Bishop of hope wrote: »

The last Govt was a minority Govt anyway, didn't have 50% support, go figure!

So more people voted against the Govt than did for it.

More people voted for FF and SF than FG. This is a fact, no matter what you say its a fact!

The people want change.

Bishop of hope

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

So more people voted against the Govt than did for it.

More people voted for FF and SF than FG. This is a fact, no matter what you say its a fact!

The people want change.

OK but if you put FF/FG/Greens together ditto.
What's your point?

efanton

Bishop of hope wrote: »

The last Govt was a minority Govt anyway, didn't have 50% support, go figure!

But with what was essentially a duopoly a confidences and supply agreement was possible, even though it didn't work as well as both parties thought it would.

With three parties now vying for the vote its hard to see how any minority government could be formed in future.

Of course FF could implode as Labour have done if they dont do some serious house keeping and clear out their current front bench if a new general election is called. Then you would be back to a position where two parties (FG and SF) get the lions share of the vote. Hard to see either giving the other a C&S agreement though.

FrancieBrady

When are the Independents coming in for the bypasses, reopened garda stations and freebies?

Bishop of hope

FrancieBrady wrote: »

When are the Independents coming in for the bypasses, reopened garda stations and freebies?

When SF get involved probably:)

dundalkfc10

Bishop of hope wrote: »

OK but if you put FF/FG/Greens together ditto.
What's your point?

My point is people voted for change. FG in Govt with FF is not change.

markodaly

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

My point is people voted for change. FG in Govt with FF is not change.

Is the point really lost on you that some people voted for change, others did not?
If the people really voted for change, then MLMD would be Taoiseach right now with a left-wing coalition of sorts.

The very fact that she has not even tried to form such a coalition in the first place because as she admits, the numbers are not there, tells us all we need to know about this vote for 'change'.

Hubertj

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

My point is people voted for change. FG in Govt with FF is not change.

why don't SF form a government then?

StackSteevens

Hubertj wrote: »

why don't SF form a government then?

Because they haven't got enough seats! and no sensible non-SF politician - other than the sneaking regarders on the republican fringes of FF - would touch them with a bargepole!

Dancing with SF is a mug's game - just look at what they did to the SDLP north of the border.

efanton

StackSteevens wrote: »

Because they haven't got enough seats! and no sensible non-SF politician - other than the sneaking regarders on the republican fringes of FF - would touch them with a bargepole!

Dancing with SF is a mug's game - just look at what they did to the SDLP north of the border.

To be fair what happened to the SDLP was not SF's fault, more the DUP and Arlene Foster.

In her drive to stop any sort of sensible solution to the brexit problem between Ireland and the UK she persuaded other Unionist parties to not put forward candidates, so there would be a greater number of Brexit supporting MLA's. The nationalist parties, along with those opposed to brexit, had to respond in kind.
The unfortunate consequence of that was the SDLP lost many of their seats.

FrancieBrady

StackSteevens wrote: »

Because they haven't got enough seats! and no sensible non-SF politician - other than the sneaking regarders on the republican fringes of FF - would touch them with a bargepole!

You can pretend that the moral high grounding about the Shinners is principle led...it isn't of course, it is all about power, and letting go of it.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/fianna-f%C3%A1il-reaction-martin-opens-door-to-government-with-fg-or-sf-1.4167246

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/election-2020/martin-opens-the-door-to-coalition-with-sinn-fein-38941313.html

Dancing with SF is a mug's game - just look at what they did to the SDLP north of the border.

They need to seek forgiveness for representing the people better than another party now?