Thesiger wrote: » One surname I’ve only ever heard of in the context of Irish gangland is Sugg. What the feck is that? Also it’s gas that one of our most feared gangsters is called Cornelius.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » I was reading this article this morning over breakfast: https://www.rte.ie/news/analysis-and-comment/2020/0529/1143486-inside-kinahan-gang/ I've asked before, but why do so many of the people involved in crime have planter/tan surnames? Capper, Hutch, Thompson, Curtis, Price, Davis, Little, Parker Not a single Gael surname amongst them.
MickyPearse wrote: » Fat freddies mate Mad Dog's house got raided today. Guards were taking no nonsense! threatened to pepper spray anyone who got in their way ���� another kinahan foot soldier being targetted
kotou2 wrote: » Possibly a rat, why every Hit team is failing. But it appears cops are bugging lots phones/ cars / houses - far more than we think. i thought Whatsapp and Messenger were pretty secure. Cops with fancy tech, could only intercept plain old text messages. Anyone know, has it been declared in a case yet, that cops can listen to calls? Where's Gdpr when need it. If they can listen in to calls, is it all recorded for podcast replay or must they listen live like netflix narcos? Haven't heard proof in any court cases, revealing cops ability to listen to calls. But why else would top crimos opt for special encrypted phones, unless no harm being extra safe. Some recent news, lads were caught with signal jamming device. Which stops their calls and everyones nearby. Unless they suspect their phones are listening to them when chatting and jammers prevent that listening in.
MelvinWagstaff wrote: » They are listening to everything. It's not being mentioned in court because the info they obtain is inadmissible. They use the info they obtain to catch their targets in the midst of a crime and then when it comes to charging them for x,y & z, they dont mention the listening etc. This is why a lot of criminals are using encrypted phones, there are several types.
The enlightened one wrote: » Another example of inadmissible evidence would be if they had intercepted a bunch of phones at the airport that they knew were coming in. Switched the phones while questioning the courier for 2 hours before eventually letting them go through. Harvest a huge amount of Intel from the phones while sitting back and watching the lads accuse each other of being a rat..
Notdeco wrote: » Bull crap, switching phones bul****, the phones would be encrypted. Could not be broken by brute force (brute force is a very old code breaker) within a couple of hours. So much ****e being posted. Please stop with you ****e. You watch way too many movies. And know fook all about encryption. Your posts are hilarious.
The enlightened one wrote: » I know more about encryption and the related technology than you ever will. I also know more about surveillance and counter surveillance than you ever will. However, I am not one to stick around where I'm not wanted. I won't share anything else here in future.
Figel Narage wrote: » Is that his former driver who he was looking for money off or the lad who saw the Sunday World taking pictures of him and dropped his trousers and let them take pictures of his Mickey haha. I know that sounds strange to read but I remember bursting out laughing when I saw it, no f**ks given by that guy
Random Account wrote: » What do the informants get off the Garda for information? Money and protection?
Haladmirer wrote: » I was only ever caught for drugs not criminal stuff like robbery or violence
newuser99999 wrote: » News to me that we’ve decriminalized drugs!
MickyPearse wrote: » Defo the second one. Pure lunatic. Involved in all sorts of armed robberies back in the day. For such a loose cannon I'm suprised we dont hear much about him
Haladmirer wrote: » I live my life like they were legal anyway and so do a lot of other people
Haladmirer wrote: » Wasn't it Jamie Griffin or his brother that flashed the Mickey? Mad dog is Ian Maloney who's house was raided
MickyPearse wrote: » Feeding the problem. You must DK is legitimate so? He has no convictions just runs a drug empire
Haladmirer wrote: » I think of DK same as you prob A mass murderer
AmberGold wrote: » You’d think at this point they’d have joined the dots over there especially for a country that carries the death penalty for drugs possession with intent to resell.
On 24 November 2007, Grooverider was arrested at Dubai International Airport for possession of 2.16 grams of cannabis, which he claimed he had forgotten was in a pair of his trousers.[6] "I must have forgotten the spliff," he said in an interview. "It was a small amount. Back home I would not even get prosecuted."[7] On 19 February 2008, he was sentenced to four years' imprisonment, to be followed by immediate deportation (four years is the mandatory sentence for drug possession in the United Arab Emirates).[7] He was pardoned and released on 3 September 2008, during the holy month of Ramadan that traditionally sees the pardoning of select prisoners in UAE.[6] In an interview with BBC, Grooverider described his experience and the conditions in which he was placed as "appalling".[8]
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c2f272c464d99a9eee64a80fbe71a0c.svg)
