hotmail.com wrote: » What happened to Obama's popularity among black Americans when no police officers were prosecuted during his time in office?
TomOnBoard wrote: » I don't believe the vast bulk of African Americans have been supporting Trump at all. Any ones who have supported hIm up to last week, despite his record over the last 3 years, won't care tuppence about what's happening in Minneapolis. They're totally committed to him at this stage.
Thargor wrote: » Be interesting to see the effect of his recent behaviour on his polling with African Americans over the next few weeks, it should be a total wipeout for him, they're raging over the last few deaths (rightfully).
Tea drinker wrote: » How do you know which is which / black or white? Is he not saying looters should be shot - which is a fairly common response in US tbh
Gintonious wrote: » This is the most Irish analogy I have ever seen in my life. 2020.
Foxtrol wrote: » Quite a contrast when you look at Trump's comments when he is talking about white protesters and black. It was about this time last week when a certain element were faux outraged by a poor joke Biden made and now Trump is out there saying black protesters should be shot.https://twitter.com/jason_kint/status/1266240283068362752?s=20
pixelburp wrote: » Probably one of the first things a Biden presidency would do, but in the interim this could cause chaos along the logistical structure of the country's fight against CoVid (or other health related initiatives of course, it's not all pandemics). A garbage fire of a presidency, no rhyme or reason beyond sheer conspiratorial petulance.
Itssoeasy wrote: » 17 years ? Is it not 27 years. I'm sure I heard the deal was until 2047 but maybe I'm wrong.
Itssoeasy wrote: » It's like a gaa manager complaining to the umpire because your keeper couldn't stop the ball going into the net. The coronavirus was a sliotar dropping into the square and every country had to defend against it however they could. The trump administration messed up.
Leroy42 wrote: » Took only a week for Trump himself to prove you wrong.
listermint wrote: » Look over here. Look over there... That's all hes at. He's annoyed by twitter because it's putting him on the spot and be can't do a thing is eo did nothing. So China. Pulling out of who
kowloonkev wrote: » Trump as usual the first world leader to stand up for the rights of Hong Kong and pretty much the only leader to recognize and put pressure on the greatest threat to democracy since the start of democracy.
aloyisious wrote: » Trump to Hong Kong: I am going to support you in your efforts to have the Chinese Govt honour the deal it signed with the British Govt giving you independent power over your affairs for the next 17 years by cutting off recognition of your independent state and leaving you high and dry.
Retr0gamer wrote: » Dropping support for Hong Kong is baffling. It's like supporting china then going on a rant about making china pay. It's such a schizophrenic response.
Gintonious wrote: » Pulling the USA out of the WHO...what a child!
PropJoe10 wrote: » Idiotic and I'd say it'll probably be reversed. He's worse than a 3 year old toddler.
aloyisious wrote: » Trump said he's transferring funding to other organisations who do the same job. Who are they and would they have the credibility of W.H.O in other countries [if Trump has a notion for them to do what the W.H.O does]. More importantly for the citizenry of the U.S, does it mean the ending of W.H.O's assistance to the U.S bodies fighting Covid-19 and other killer diseases in the U.S.? That would seem to be the inevitable result if Trump has totally ended official U.S Govt and nation medical co-operation with W.H.O. No recognition of W.H.O by the U.S would mean it couldn't work there as it's certification there would be gone.
pixelburp wrote: » What? What possible purpose does this yield? That's an insane decision. Wing-nut politics truly is in control in America; they the only non member in the WHO?
