peddlelies wrote: » Deflection reflex with everything that's been going on. Kinda like when you stub your toe and yell out FECK.
peddlelies wrote: » I disagree with some of the rhetoric about the police, imo the overwhelming majority of them are brave people who put their lives on the line protecting others, as much as it's a tough subject some minorities are disproportionately committing serious crimes so imo it's not a fair statement to say police are targeting blacks.
Blueshoe wrote: » Anything he wants. His followers would likely close accounts too. Millions of people. Twitter advertising revenue would drop like a rock. Share price would fall. They won't do anything
circadian wrote: » Any idea why he just tweeted CHINA! a few hours ago??
pixelburp wrote: » I think that's overstating the value of Trump "supporters" on Twitter. Sure, I'd say there'll be plenty of attempts at boycotts and mass deletions - not least from Fox News or Sinclair - but there's no sense or sign that Trump's Twitter followers are majority fans. There are as many rubber-neckers and those out to simply watch the garbage fire from afar. That's not to say being banned from Twitter wouldn't be an issue in of itself, but nor do I believe it'd be seen in the number of accounts. Heck if anything, there's as good an argument the numbers would trend upwards.
Foxtrol wrote: » The overwhelming majority of them do absolutely nothing to stop the 'bad eggs'. In this murder and practically every other one we've seen on camera, there are other police officers that stand by and do nothing to stop 'the bad egg'. The officer this time had something like 18 previous complaints and I'd guarantee that each time the cops he was with backed him up. For the most part US cops are under trained, have too much weaponry, and have a toxic brotherhood mentality.
namloc1980 wrote: » The police officer has been arrested:.
extra gravy wrote: » Now charged with murder.
Blueshoe wrote: » Anything he wants. His followers would likely close accounts too. Millions of people. Twitter advertising revenue would drop like a rock. Share price would fall.They won't do anything
Gunmonkey wrote: » Ah, so following Trumps lead on....pretty much anything! So you are saying there are millions of people using Twitter purely to look at Trumps tweets! No other celebrities, no connection to Fox News or other news outlets, not even to their friends/families/work colleagues? Only The Don, and would leave if he wasnt there! Gonna need some evidence there, hombre.
Gintonious wrote: » Pulling the USA out of the WHO...what a child!
pixelburp wrote: » What? What possible purpose does this yield? That's an insane decision. Wing-nut politics truly is in control in America; they the only non member in the WHO?
PropJoe10 wrote: » Idiotic and I'd say it'll probably be reversed. He's worse than a 3 year old toddler.
aloyisious wrote: » Trump said he's transferring funding to other organisations who do the same job. Who are they and would they have the credibility of W.H.O in other countries [if Trump has a notion for them to do what the W.H.O does]. More importantly for the citizenry of the U.S, does it mean the ending of W.H.O's assistance to the U.S bodies fighting Covid-19 and other killer diseases in the U.S.? That would seem to be the inevitable result if Trump has totally ended official U.S Govt and nation medical co-operation with W.H.O. No recognition of W.H.O by the U.S would mean it couldn't work there as it's certification there would be gone.