Bob Harris wrote: » Yeah but it's class food in fairness and the uniform is top clobber.
gmisk wrote: » Scumbag behaviour. A guy posted his payslip on Twitter he paid more in food and uniform than he paid in taxes....ffs
gmisk wrote: » I totally agree. There is chemist near where i work that was charging 27 euro for 3 bottles of homemade hand sanitizer....I will never darken their door again, I also doubt anyone from my office will either.
Deleted User wrote: » But that was the whole point of it. To ensure people didn't feel it necessary to sneak back to work or do nixers or such, and keep people at home. And it worked, by and large.
CrabRevolution wrote: » I like to think you're being sarcastic, but I'm really not sure.
Strumms wrote: » What an utter cûnt of a human being, I can say without a shadow of a doubt that I’d have eaten my last supermacs. Not that it makes a great dent in their financials but it’s the principal, fûck em.. I said earlier in this thread that we ALL need to remember ANY and indeed ALL businesses who are using this health situation to screw their employees, their customers or the health thereof in any and all regards, another, to the list.
jimgoose wrote: » Well first of all McDonagh is a fairly tight, miserated operator by any standards, let alone those of fast-food operators. He and others also forget that the whole point of the 350 Euro payment in the first place was to encourage people to leave work at a time when it was deemed unsafe for people to be at work. Obviously anyone receiving more money for being sat at home is going to prefer it, and endeavour to extend the situation for as long as possible. Does he think people are idiots?? :pac:
ciano1 wrote: » When I worked there, minimum wage was still €8.65. It was written into the contract that 50c/hr was to be deducted from your wages for 'Staff food' (Regardless of whether or not it was eaten). We were allowed to take €7.50 worth of food per shift. There was also a mandatory €3 per week charge for the uniform. Do the maths....
the beer revolu wrote: » Surely they can't charge employees for meals without their say so? I've always thought it terribly unfair that employees can be charged for uniforms that they have to wear!
gmisk wrote: » Supermacs also regularly object to planning applications for food outlets anywhere near them especially on sure square. Btw pat mc Donagh is worth...about 120m
Woke Hogan wrote: » Pat McDonagh is happy to give us the poor mouth stuff when it comes to paying his employees a living wage but then they’re supposed to jump at the chance of slinging fried pig**** for a paltry 80euros a week and the privilege of getting charged a levy for meals they’re not even eating. The only thing more disgusting than the ****ing slurry Pat McDonagh is serving is his attitude towards his employees. He should be tarred and feathered in Eyre Square for his comments.
jester77 wrote: » The whole unemployment system needs an overhaul. The fact that everyone gets the same benefit is ridiculous. I like the system here in Germany, you get roughly two thirds of your salary for 1 year, and after that you have to meet a lot of criteria to get any further benefits, e.g. using up savings, selling property, downsizing apartment or house if too big, etc
Sunny Disposition wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/criticism-in-dail-of-supermacs-bosss-claim-some-workers-won-the-lotto-with-350-a-week-unemployment-payment-39242115.html????? McDonagh is right there is an anomaly but it’s not like winning the lotto. But what really struck me is that he charges his own staff for meals they may not even want. That’s really tight, could qualify for the stingiest thing you’ve see stingy people do thread!