Bishop of hope wrote: » You're missing the point We are all stuck with mistakes because of our own choices, something to whinge about because of others choices, but the choices are made not by us in the final scenario, but by those we voted for. If SF get in to Govt, and it could happen this term yet, its likely that the FG/FF/Green talks will have broken down. Then if there is a Govt formed the most likely one will be a SF/FF led coalition. Another election will likely bring about the same kind of scenario we have now, so the plot will continue, to perhaps even a SF/FG coalition. A lot of people will have to eat some kind of humble pie when it happens. However as any Govt formed at any time will have been voted for by a majority of TD's, elected by a majority of voters, whether the majority of voters are happy with that choice or not. That's the political reality in Ireland currently. Is it the politicians fault or the voters?
FrancieBrady wrote: » When one set of politicians Y promise the electorate that they will never go into coalition with X, then before the ticks are dry on the ballot papers are cozying up to X, then of course the blame lies with the politicians. Both Y and X (for accepting the advances.) It is making a mockery of the electorate because they do it hoping the electorate will forget.
Bishop of hope wrote: » As FF said they wouldn't go into coalition with SF, what would you say if it happened, what would your feelings towards SF be if it happened, or with FG for that matter?
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's a lie. In the case of FF + FG then the onus should be on FF to explain why they lied..same if they go into talks with SF. The whole election process and wider politics is devalued by these pre-election lies and posturing. And it happens because you have two parties that are historically practically the same and have had to engage in this to offer some kind of sham difference. It treats you and me equally as fools.
Bishop of hope wrote: » Carefully avoiding my question again and going on with the same old same old.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I thought it was implicit in what I said. I would be unhappy with SF going in with FF without the lies being addressed. Same as I would be with the current coalition.
Bowie wrote: » If point scoring is pointing out legitimate criticisms and wanting to discuss them, sure. You said you have issue with care homes and others talking about it are SF trying to score points. It seems to be a case of only the criticism you agree with and everyone else must have an agenda. Seems legit.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » I’m afraid there is a huge difference between ‘social media warriors’ and real life. When the chips are down, reality and pragmatism will always win out. How could anyone imagine SF and a bunch of marxists and commies running the country in good times never mind in times like this. No my friend, only coins with nothing to lose and leaning toward anarchy could even dream of such a set up. Billy Taxpayer has the sense to send that bad boy packing.
dundalkfc10 wrote: » More people wanted SF to run the country than FG. The votes showed that in the election so stop talking absolute ****e. The world has changed, the days of propaganda by the media and RTE in Ireland are over, again the election results showed us that
Mortelaro wrote: » That was answered before Several elections past,you could have used the same logic to say more people wanted FF in power but they weren't And that's when FF was near 40% You need to learn about democracy and how things work Build alliances and you have pathway to government Don't and you don't
McMurphy wrote: » They're all liars. But it seems only the shinners line is the one that gets wheeled out.
FrancieBrady wrote: » And you need to learn what 'lying' to the electorate means. 'Build alliances'...how I laughed at that one. Pretend there is no alliance until it suits your sleeveen quest for power.
Mortelaro wrote: » You can laugh away,but you still need the alliance unless you have an over all majority-Fact Lying is not a word appropriate for positions on that prior to knowing an election result that could be a stalemate
FrancieBrady wrote: » Stop...you are putting me into hysterics reading your spin. 'Lying is not a word appropriate' for saying one think and doing the exact opposite.
Mortelaro wrote: » It isn't really a sustainable description, No It devalues the word A better description would be to say it was misleading Except it's all moot because practically everyone knows what's possible and what's not and the FG FF marriage was always for now probably the most likely if the numbers added up than one with SF That's not always going to be the way For what it's worth, I might even vote for Sinn Féin one day There are quite a few SF t.d's I'd be very happy to see in government before others tbh Which is another reason I kind of only see the banter in here as a bit of banter more so than the living document that is government When it does happen there'll be a negotiated government aswell Negotiated government's are compromises not extremes
FrancieBrady wrote: » Mort, just stop. You are devaluing yourself now. A lie is a lie.
FrancieBrady wrote: » And you need to learn what 'lying' to the electorate means. 'Build alliances'...how I laughed at that one.Pretend there is no alliance until it suits your sleeveen quest for power.
Hamsterchops wrote: » 10/10 to Leo and the gang for doing such a great job in the current crisis. Ireland is being held up as an example to the world on how to tackle a pandemic. Top marks to Fine Gael... I just hope the Irish electorate recognise this, and give them a thumping majority in the next General Election.
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Its gonna be a bad day for FG. Every day, new reports show the shambles with basically every part of their handling of thishttps://twitter.com/indepdubnrth/status/1266157756957982722?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
blackwhite wrote: » Sums up the SF cultists on here. Anyone taking responsibility and trying to form a Government is on a "sleveen quest for power" - all whilst Sinn Fein are doing their utmost to hide from anything resembling a position of responsibility. When Mary Lou finally makes a genuine effort to negotiate with other parties will that be a "sleveen quest" as well - or is it suddenly a noble effort because she's from the correct party? Weasel words and propaganda as always :rolleyes:
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Tell that to all the poor people's familys who died in Public and Private Nursing Homes. Today in the Dail even more will come out
Deleted User wrote: » I assume that you actually read the letter?