jetsonx wrote: » Kelloggs breakfast cereals. The ones from Lidl taste more wholesome and less sugared.
Redo91 wrote: » Aren’t most shoes made in China? Doesn’t mean the quality isn’t good.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Does she take it off when... you know I wouldn't want that data going into the cloud
RandomViewer wrote: » Wife has one, must be 2 years, never any bother
The UK blocked tougher EU trade rules to help the steel industry partly because it could have raised the price of shoes for British shoppers, Sajid Javid has said. The business secretary argued the UK opposed scrapping the so-called lesser duty rule as it would have “cost British shoppers dear”, including an extra £130m a year on the price of footwear – the equivalent of about £4.80 for each household. A number of EU countries have been trying to get the rule lifted, as it would allow higher tariffs to be imposed on cut-price Chinese steel being dumped on the world market.
RandomViewer wrote: Wife has one, must be 2 years, never any bother
Better Than Christ wrote: » The sugar's the best part.
micar wrote: » Most brand of runners Asics, Brooks, ,Mizuno, New Balance and Nike are all up to €150 a pair. They bring out a spring/summer pair and an autumn/winter pair. No point in buying this season's pair. I always buy last season pair which would be reduced to around €100.
L1011 wrote: » Standard Apple booster reply circa 1998. It doesn't work anymore. It barely passed then and that was because most people had never used any Apple kit then - now nearly everyone has. Nobody who criticises Apple kit secretly wishes they could use it - they have and wish they hadn't.
gormdubhgorm wrote: » I watched the netflix documentary on the Chicago Bulls - the last dance. It was good but very 'Michael Jordan centric.' I am not really into basketball - was a casual watcher of CH4 NBA in the 90's. But then I realised that Michael Jordan is still churning out those runners which are made in China and sold for inflated prices - he has some neck on him. Plus the consumers of those runners clearly only still purchase them, because of the Jordan brand name. Fools and thier money are easily parted. Has to be one of the most overrated brands? Jordan shoes
All that fandango wrote: » Fitbit. Shoddiest heap of crap Ive ever spent money on. Nothing but issues regarding syncing and pairing with bluetooth.
georgina...c wrote: » Pfeh nandos. Don't get it. .
thequarefellow wrote: » Asics running shoes. I was talked into spending almost €200 on a pair of these for their 'superior quality and support; choice of top runners etc etc' when I started running a few years ago. They fell apart after 6 months.
thequarefellow wrote: » Have to second Dyson. Overhyped, plasticky, but most of all just don't deliver on suction.
Paris Skinny Wallpaper wrote: » I miss subway, went there every Friday for the last 5 years Or but haven’t had one since lockdown, subway day was the best day of the week. Delicious!
snoopboggybog wrote: » I always feel ill after a subway. Stopped eating there.
georgina...c wrote: » Pfeh nandos. Don't get it. And subway. Ate there twice. Both times .. muck.
Wizard! wrote: » Lacoste I still have some polo shirts I bought back in the 80's. Their colors are saturated, the fabric still perfect. However, the new ones? From mid 90's and later? Worse than some Chinese copies you buy for 5 euros. However, the prices are still high.Nautica Similar case, but they were never of good quality, although they are at the same price range of Lacoste
On the Christian Louboutin website, under “Product Care,” the brand states “red lacquer on our soles will wear off with the use of the shoes,”
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/6b1975299c8e5d4897a60061c4f145b7.svg)
