bilbot79 wrote: » This isn't unfeasible at all Dublin gaff 550 splits into Irish countryside gaff - 300 Pad 1 abroad - 125 Pad 2 abroad -125 What's up doc?
Neames wrote: » I see a headline today on the Irish Times that the government is considering income tax benefits for working from home. I don't have an online subscription to the Irish Times so can't see beyond the headline. Anyone have any details on this?
Jim2007 wrote: » Why do you need to feel you belong to a company in the first place? My family, my friends and my local community very much so, but a company no. It’s an economic arrangement, I’m not there to socialize or be popular, I’m there to do a job and get well paid for doing it.
Stheno wrote: » If you post the link I can post the details here
Neames wrote: » https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/next-government-could-bring-in-work-from-home-tax-incentives-taoiseach-1.4262362 There you go Stheno thanks very much
A Government spokesman added: “Current Government policy is to encourage firms to allow more home-working and also more flexible working. It could therefore make sense for the next government to look at ways of encouraging more home-working in the long run. And the proposal for tax incentives, suggested by the NBRU, is certainly worth considering.” Mr Martin also told Mr O’Leary that all options must be considered in helping public transport deal with the effects of the virus, such as “staggering starting times for schools, third-level institutions and workplaces as well as supporting those who wish to work from home”. Fianna Fáil did not provide further clarity on what kind of support Mr Martin envisaged for working from home. The joint framework document already agreed between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael said the public sector would be mandated to “move to 20 per cent home and remote working in 2021” and that “incentives” would be provided for “private sector employers to do likewise”.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » This week, I got my first request to investigate trackerware software for one company I'm supporting. Fwiw. I'm sure there will be more.
KyussB wrote: » Here you go guys - exactly as I predicted earlier in the thread - this here is your future working from home:https://www.veriato.com/solutions/use-cases/remote-employee-monitoring Complete employer spying/viewing of your home computers. Want a job? Give up all your privacy, to any manager that wants to snoop through your home devices. Surprised at how little time that took to begin entering the mainstream.
KyussB wrote: » ......... Surprised at how little time that took to begin entering the mainstream.
Sunrise_Sunset wrote: » I'm starting a new job soon after years of being an SAHM. It will be WFH to begin with. My salary is nothing to write home about so I'm really banking on being able to continue WFH for at least half of the week. Otherwise childcare costs would take a huge chunk of my salary, as it does for many others.
Stheno wrote: » Why would you use personal devices for work?
jrosen wrote: » What is the new jobs policy on childcare? Is there an acceptance your children are in your care while your working?
KyussB wrote: » I think you just missed the point to a staggering degree.
Biker79 wrote: » Currently, personal devices are being used, but only because most organisations did not have a plan in place for something like this pandemic. Once things settle down it will be company-issued devices for WFH.
Deleted User wrote: » For sure that will happen - corporate device, corporate phone, and a proper review of WFH conditions to ensure that it is feasible on a permanent basis (whether there is an adequate space and childcare is not too much of a burden). If you were wording in a studio, and the work environment was sitting on the end of your bed, I dont see how an employer could agree to that, not least for health and safety reasons. I think that the expectation of many is that the emergency working from home arrangements during this pandemic are what working from home will look like on a permanent basis. But it will be much more formal
bilbot79 wrote: » I'd be tempted to buy a little apartment in the Canaries and spend my winters there, in fact I'd probably 1/ Sell my Dublin gaff 2/ By a cheaper Irish gaff in the countryside 3/ Buy a place in the Canaries 4/ Buy another place somewhere in Europe, Hvar or somewhere like that And just spend weeks and months in each place. How would the rest of you exploit work from home if you had it permanently?
Sunrise_Sunset wrote: » Yes, for now anyway. Once I'm past my probationary period I will be requesting to WFH a couple of days a week. It could even be a requirement or something that is offered by the employer at that stage, who knows. My kids are of school going age and reasonably self sufficient around the house so I could still work.
Biker79 wrote: » This is false. WFH home will allow companies greater control over devices used to access their networks for the purposes of data security primarily. Employee productivity is further down the list of priorities. While some WFH home options may allow you to use a personal device, these won't be ideal post-COVID-19. Any system that allows a complete end to end monitoring of information flow will be the preferred choice. This relates to GDPR/ data security compliance.
MOH wrote: » If all their staff are working remotely anyway, why wouldn't companies just outsource your job to countries with a cheaper workforce, instead of funding your 3 homes?
Interested Observer wrote: » Maybe you can explain. I have a work phone and a work laptop, and a personal phone and a personal PC&Laptop. I do all my work on the work devices, in fact I'd get in serious trouble if I did any work on a non-work computer. How will my employer see anything on the personal devices?