Cal4567 wrote: » The tax to try prevent property owners from hoarding land was only collected by 1 in 8 councils last yearhttps://www.thejournal.ie/vacant-site-levy-5104669-May2020/The report showed only four of the country’s 31 local authorities – Dublin City, Kilkenny, Waterford and Wicklow – had made any collection of the levy last year, while more than a quarter of council had no active register of vacant sites. I do really struggle to appreciate how local authorities can be effective stakeholders in the general property market. They complain about not being able to demonstrate local management and accountability but when are given the opportunity to do so, fail miserably. I think I'd much prefer my tax dollars to be used by central government with a country wide approach, we are really quite a small country.
cnocbui wrote: » https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/12/tech/twitter-work-from-home-forever/index.html All it will take for a really big change would be for governments to grow a pair and increase payroll type taxes for workers in offices in major cities and reduce or eliminate such taxes for working from home. Instead of the constant pressure to spend more and more public money on improving infrastructure in cities for the near exclusive benefit of corporations, they should provide incentive for the corporations to decentralise and get out of cities so they don't have to basically subsidise the freeloaders. They pay stuff all tax and expect governments to spend a huge proportion of public revenues to their near exclusive benefit.
Hubertj wrote: » I miss the office and look forward to getting back there. I don’t have a commute - 20 min run. I may continue to wfh once a week when things return to a level of normality. I miss socia interaction with people on a personal and professional level. Developing interpersonal skills, confidence, etc is better done, in my opinion, face to face. My home office set up is fine so that’s not a factor in my preference to an office
1percent wrote: » What do ye think of my amateur economic projection?
Twitter will allow some of its workforce to continue working from home "forever" if they choose, the company confirmed to CNN Business on Tuesday. The decision reflects how some measures implemented to deal with the pandemic could lead to a new normal for corporate America, even after the immediate health crisis.
Mic 1972 wrote: » Genuine question, how are people liking Working From Home? I've been doing it since January and I'm expected to be on it until December as the company i work for now specifically hired me as a home based associate. Honestly I miss all things I used to hate when being at the office, the daily penny chats, the background chatter, the coffee machines, the canteen routine, etc.. This combined with lock down is making me extremely bored If there is life after Covid I'm probably going to go for an office based job again next year
Interested Observer wrote: » .......... somewhere on the coast. Would have to be fairly cheap so the question is would anyone have recommendations for areas of the country to look at?
1percent wrote: » ................do the goverment use cheap debt and a freely available labour pool to start a social house building project (politically motivation is there as it grasps SF whip hand)........
Interested Observer wrote: » Facebook/Mark Zuckerberg did a live stream yesterday where he said he expects 50% of their workforce to be remote working in the next 5-10 years. It is 100% coming. This is totally unrelated, and some ways down the line, but my wife and I are considering looking at a holiday house type thing in Ireland somewhere. It wouldn't really be an investment, we'd want to use it ourselves, somewhere on the coast. Would have to be fairly cheap so the question is would anyone have recommendations for areas of the country to look at?
Mic 1972 wrote: Genuine question, how are people liking Working From Home? I've been doing it since January and I'm expected to be on it until December as the company i work for now specifically hired me as a home based associate.
HodlforWin79 wrote: » You obviously don't work in the tech game or know anyone who does. That post is on par with having a luddites view of things or just not having any insight into the topic.
Villa05 wrote: » My long lost brother, welcome to boards
Claw Hammer wrote: » WFH is just a fad, like "blues sky thinking" , outsourcing, "going forward", "at this point in time". It will all pass.
Padre_Pio wrote: » If WFH is more attractive to employees than gyms and smoothie bars, you can guarantee companies will move to a WFH policy. It costs an employer about €2000 to set up a home office, with desk, chair, screens, etc. It costs far more to maintain an office space with the same equipment, plus utilities, cleaning, security, maintenance etc. If FB and Twitter are doing it, I guarantee every IT company is at least considering it. Even if you have to come into a Dublin office one day a week, a commute from Galway or Cork is very doable.
1percent wrote: The wild card then, if money is being consumed in the real economy and equities are deflating, Bonds become a better store of wealth meaning continued cheap gov debt. If there is an over supply of construction workers in the market because developers are not developing at the same rate because of increased cost with reduced value and commercial property is back from its lofty heights. do the goverment use cheap debt and a freely available labour pool to start a social house building project (politically motivation is there as it grasps SF whip hand) removing the HAP recipients from the Private rental market and reducing demand and yields further.
1percent wrote: What do ye think of my amateur economic projection?
1percent wrote: Just a fun thought experiment.
Billythekid19 wrote: Tom Parlon was on radio 1 this morning to clarify he meant 40% decrease in prodcuctivity rather than 40% increased costs to build the childrens hospital!
Tallback wrote: To be fair to Auctioneera - unlike a lot of others he's completely transparent as to his angle. It's even in the username! People can take that into consideration when assessing his points but to my mind its hugely useful to have someone "inside" the property market giving their view
SozBbz wrote: New homes will not continue to be built. Many developers will lay people off or stop using their subcontractors who will in turn lay people off. Developers will not build if they cant get the finance and/or can't make the margins necessary. That industry will shrink.
FVP3 wrote: » I doubt it, if the company saves money on corporate rent and cheaper workers why wouldn't they continue with it? The crisis has accelerated a process that was ongoing anyway.
cnocbui wrote: » I doubt planned new homes will be built until there is greater market certainty. I can't imagine any builder proceeding at the moment if there is even the slightest chance of a return to a dysfunctional market with prices below cost. Do have some numbers or evidence for these 'plenty' of large homes due to the owners in care?
Billythekid19 wrote: » Tom Parlon was on radio 1 this morning to clarify he meant 40% decrease in prodcuctivity rather than 40% increased costs to build the childrens hospital!
alan_mur wrote: » As a previous seller with Auctioneera, they provided a great service and were significantly cheaper than other estate agencies. I completed in March. I tend to disagree with the view that prices won't fall but I do believe that there will be reductions at certain price points and markets. From a Dublin perspective: On the demand side, driving down the prices: Short term rentals are dead. Long term rental prices are dropping, purely down to supply and demand. So rental yields will drive down price I'm not going back into the office until at least October, probably not til next year so remote working will increase and become normal. SOme people will move out of Dublin. Some foreign workers that may have been potential buyers may work from their own country. Banks are going through there mortgage approvals and reducing the loan amounts in line with affordability measures. I got emailed by an agent yesterday to say that I couldn't see a house until I could show that I had mortgage approval in place. Sale agreed are falling through, this is a short term problem for the market. There is a significant green agenda now and the Government will look to bring in retrofit grants. There are lots of 30s,40s,50s,60s houses on the market with BER G,F, E where the house aren't currently suitable to live in. They require €100k - €250k to refurbish On the supply side Houses are going on the market. There are 46 new listing on daft in Dublin North city in the last week. Planned new homes will continue to be built, it's that or lay off the builders. There is no where from them to go this time around. There are plenty of empty large home due to people in care home and health issues. These will come on the market.
alan_mur wrote: » ... Planned new homes will continue to be built, it's that or lay off the builders. There is no where from them to go this time around. There are plenty of empty large home due to people in care home and health issues. These will come on the market.
Padre_Pio wrote: » I've seen your fees policy and as I said I welcome the discussion. But this is a discussion, a forum where ideas can be exchanged and hopefully peoples views and opinions mature and grow. But you're an auctioneer website, not a person (even if there's a person typing out responses) You're outlook cannot change, because to do so means you lose money. So even if the property market is burning down, you'll say it's alright and put on a brave face, like the orchestra on the Titanic. The reps on the Talk To forums like Liberty or Irish Water are no different to you. I would also question if we're talking to one person, or are their multiple people with access to this account? EDIT: of course this is just one persons opinion and i have zero power to do anything.
Villa05 wrote: » Sarah mcInenery rte radio 1 yesterday 2 sections 1 general construction 2 children's hospital It was a developor that rubbished Tom parlon claims