nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Donald Trump Presidency discussion Thread VII (threadbanned users listed in OP)

ancapailldorcha

This thread is a continuation of the megathreads for discussing the presidency of Donald Trump and any matters which relate to this.

Please keep discussion civil and constructive and bear the charter in mind before posting.

Update 16/5/20:

Threadbanned users:

Outlaw Pete
everlast75
mcmoustache
BonnieSituation

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

sydthebeat

hetuzozaho wrote: »

He's not very nice is he?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1263669433366728704

Wacky. Do nothing.
Not their fault he didn't wear a mask? He did wear a mask?

He's frustrating to listen to. And implying that this is a reason motor companies might leave michigan. Ugh.

he tweets like a council estate pyjama wearing hag giving out about "De Gubberment Do Nuttin For Me, Ginvn Dem Foreigners Everything"

Wanderer78

hetuzozaho wrote:

He's frustrating to listen to. And implying that this is a reason motor companies might leave michigan. Ugh.

Why would you wanna listen to him, he's a fool, but he ll probably get reelected anyway

hetuzozaho

He's not very nice is he?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1263669433366728704

Wacky. Do nothing.
Not their fault he didn't wear a mask? He did wear a mask?

He's frustrating to listen to. And implying that this is a reason motor companies might leave michigan. Ugh.

Leroy42

kowloonkev wrote: »

Clearly you are ignorant of the situation. I guess you should tone down the complete one way negative spin and you might sound more credible.

Trump has already signed acts to support HK and has led international pressure that protestors needed for their cause and continue to need.

That seems quite a bit different to your claim he stood up for them and stood up to China.

Did he call Xi to adhere to international human rights? To demand democracy be allowed to continue in HK? Did he threaten sanctions?

dwayneshintzy

kowloonkev wrote: »

Clearly you are ignorant of the situation. I guess you should tone down the complete one way negative spin and you might sound more credible.

Trump has already signed acts to support HK and has led international pressure that protestors needed for their cause and continue to need.

He signed a bi-partisan bill passed by Congress, yes (after equivocating on it publicly). But I don't think it's correct to say he's led international pressure for protestors; https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/22/us/politics/trump-hong-kong-protests-xi.html

I'm not ignorant of the situation at all.

kowloonkev

dwayneshintzy wrote: »

Absolutely feck all, to say he's "stood up" for the Hong Kong people is ridiculous

Clearly you are ignorant of the situation. I guess you should tone down the complete one way negative spin and you might sound more credible.

Trump has already signed acts to support HK and has led international pressure that protestors needed for their cause and continue to need.

dwayneshintzy

Leroy42 wrote: »

What did he do for Hong Kong?

Absolutely feck all, to say he's "stood up" for the Hong Kong people is ridiculous

kowloonkev

Leroy42 wrote: »

What did he do for Hong Kong?

He has promised serious measures if the new sedition law goes ahead. Hopefully more western governments will follow his lead later today.

weisses

EltonJohn69 wrote: »

Will we See articles of impeachment ?

No point really with a "rigged" Senate.

Leroy42

kowloonkev wrote: »

Trump as usual the first world leader to stand up for the rights of Hong Kong and pretty much the only leader to recognize and put pressure on the greatest threat to democracy since the start of democracy.

What did he do for Hong Kong?

kowloonkev

Trump as usual the first world leader to stand up for the rights of Hong Kong and pretty much the only leader to recognize and put pressure on the greatest threat to democracy since the start of democracy.

PropJoe10

BonnieSituation wrote: »

It isn't strange though.

Here's the AG with Wolf Blitzer:

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/05/21/trump-ford-plant-visit-mask-michigan-attorney-general-dana-nessel-intv-tsr-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

She really went for him.

Good grief! He won't like that. Tweetstorm about "never Trumpers" incoming.

BonnieSituation

Water John wrote: »

Yeah that's great. Michigan AG said this evening, he's not welcome back.
Strange to have a POTUS flouting the law.

It isn't strange though.

Here's the AG with Wolf Blitzer:

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/05/21/trump-ford-plant-visit-mask-michigan-attorney-general-dana-nessel-intv-tsr-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

She really went for him.

Water John

Yeah that's great. Michigan AG said this evening, he's not welcome back.
Strange to have a POTUS flouting the law.

EltonJohn69

Water John wrote: »

Was asked to wear a mask, wore it at the meeting but not when the press came in. In effect broke Michigan Law.

Will we See articles of impeachment ?

BonnieSituation

Overheal wrote: »

A jargon war to see whether Biden or Trump makes the most non-intellectual gaffe, in debate form, could be the best presidential debate in modern history.

If Biden stays as calm as he did in the last Bernie debate he can let his brain catch up with his stammer and he'll be grand.

Trump is visibly rattled "by the hour" this last fortnight!

Water John

AFAIK the factory management asked him to wear one as it's company policy.
Michigan AG wrote a letter to him yesterday about he respecting Michigan Law.

aloyisious

Water John wrote: »

Was asked to wear a mask, wore it at the meeting but not when the press came in. In effect broke Michigan Law.

Pushing for victimhood from a sick governor.

Water John

Was asked to wear a mask, wore it at the meeting but not when the press came in. In effect broke Michigan Law.

aloyisious

BonnieSituation wrote: »

Watching that it seems to me that he's trying to tell US that testing negative is a positive thing. Just in case we were to think a bad thing about him.

That's how I'm seeing it anyway. Which is more mental really.

Looking on the "every cloud has a silver lining" side, he's not trying to claim his negativity is down to his latest testing of unrecommended medication.

Re your last "in Michigan" that's a sure sign that he and the GOP really fear Gretchen and the effect her honesty is having real-time on them, him visiting her home state.

BonnieSituation

Yeah. In Michigan.

Got a notification from the CBS app there. I'll wait for the highlights to land online after.

Conte..

is he speaking tonite?

Headshot

pixelburp wrote: »

The nuclear codes has a chain of command and all sorts of failsafes, I don't fret about that; the really demented angle is that some think this demonstrably ignorant man is a successful, savvy businessman. One wonders if it weren't for his Manhattan portfolio where he might have ended up. Those tax returns must be a doozy to be so aggressively protected - no way he's as wealthy as he claims.

Without his father's money we'd never hear of Trump.

Trump is a failed business man

Overheal

randomname2005 wrote: »

Can there be a basic word understanding check in the debates, like fake, per capita, nasty and cofeve. Might get an explanation for the last one.

A jargon war to see whether Biden or Trump makes the most non-intellectual gaffe, in debate form, could be the best presidential debate in modern history.

BonnieSituation

aloyisious wrote: »

Gintonious wrote: »

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1263518696309313537

Ah lads, what the hell is going on?

Designed confusion.

Watching that it seems to me that he's trying to tell US that testing negative is a positive thing. Just in case we were to think a bad thing about him.

That's how I'm seeing it anyway. Which is more mental really.

pixelburp

Overheal wrote: »

He has the nuclear codes.

I’m too sober for this.

The nuclear codes has a chain of command and all sorts of failsafes, I don't fret about that; the really demented angle is that some think this demonstrably ignorant man is a successful, savvy businessman. One wonders if it weren't for his Manhattan portfolio where he might have ended up. Those tax returns must be a doozy to be so aggressively protected - no way he's as wealthy as he claims.

randomname2005

Foxtrol wrote: »

You could do an endless number of them.

Here he is yesterday showing that he doesn't have a clue what per capita means

https://twitter.com/Nicoxw1/status/1263244665647697921?s=20

Can there be a basic word understanding check in the debates, like fake, per capita, nasty and cofeve. Might get an explanation for the last one.

Overheal

Foxtrol wrote: »

You could do an endless number of them.

Here he is yesterday showing that he doesn't have a clue what per capita means

https://twitter.com/Nicoxw1/status/1263244665647697921?s=20

He has the nuclear codes.

I’m too sober for this.

Foxtrol

Gintonious wrote: »

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1263518696309313537

Ah lads, what the hell is going on?

You could do an endless number of them.

Here he is yesterday showing that he doesn't have a clue what per capita means

https://twitter.com/Nicoxw1/status/1263244665647697921?s=20

aloyisious

Following from the reported claim that the FBI had not classified the documents naming General Flynn in the investigation against him, and the claims from GOP party representatives that the Dems were unlawfully trying to "unmask" Gen Flynn in said documents, General Flynn's lawyers have added another twist to the ORIGINAL tale by successfully asking a federal appeals to order the judge hearing the case to drop his decision to get a retired judge examine if Flynn should be charged and proceed immediately to decision on the case before him. It sounds very complicated but boils down to a "handle what's in front of you" order and might enable said judge to tell anyone from DOJ to feck off, I've got my limitations laid out for me by the appeals court.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/21/appeals-court-orders-flynn-judge-to-respond-to-demand-to-dismiss-case.html