StringerBell wrote: » This is it, Biden should stay out of the mud. That's his role, to be the alternative. The likes of Bloomberg, Schiff, schumer, pelosi, Sanders etc etc etc can play the roles of junior and Eric but obviously to a less odious degree Bloomberg can finance plenty of that level of mud slinging too and stay detached from it himself. Every single thing to slam Trump on, hit him and hit him hard. He is so thin skinned he will give ample ammunition on top of what is already there.
Muahahaha wrote: » Bloomberg has been relatively quiet so far but I think his deep pockets could have a major influence in the election. Was reading that they expect this election to smash all records for TV ad spends because of the virus situation, estimates have put it at over $6 billion for the two campaigns in ads alone. Last I read was that Bloomberg has decided not to set up his own Superpac but is choosing which pro Biden superpacs he will direct his first tranche of $250m to. He is on record as saying he is prepared to invest up to $1bn to the campaign but his hatred of Trump could drive that even further closer to November. Bloombergs money will be significant for the Dems fundraising efforts.Is Trump expected to have a similar super donor?
Cody montana wrote: » What will he run on? Economy in tatters. Millions unemployed Deficit exploding Little of the wall built Hillary free
Blueshoe wrote: » Makes zero sense. Being blamed for high unemployment yet ignoring the reason for the unemployment and also ignoring the rate before a global pandemic. Holds no water with anyone in possession of a rational brain
PropJoe10 wrote: » I'm sure he'll run on how the economy was booming before Covid and that the only thing to blame for the current poor economic performance is those evil Chinese and the "fake news" media. And it will most likely work, if we're being honest. His "base" will lap that up.
Foxtrol wrote: » thing where some people say 'Trump is playing 4D chess' but is actually shooting himself in the foot.
Blueshoe wrote: » Pre covid the Us unemployment rate was the lowest in 60 years.
listermint wrote: » Pre trump the definition of what constituted unemployed differed. Juking stats.
Blueshoe wrote: » I actually admire that post. Shows commitment. Just before Trump took office the definition changed. Stop the lights
rossie1977 wrote: » I don't think Bloomberg will have much influence on election. He isn't running so it's unlikely he puts much money into campaign.
Pretty much. Don't forget the reason the US was so ill prepared wasn't Trump but because Obama had left country in a mess. If Trump wasn't in charge things would be ten times worse. The Dems wasting time on impeachment meant they are fully to blame for crisis. His base and others will eat that stuff up.
Gintonious wrote: » https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1263518696309313537 Ah lads, what the hell is going on?
Gintonious wrote: » https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1263518696309313537 Ah lads, what the hell is going on?[/QUOTE Designed confusion.
aloyisious wrote: » Gintonious wrote: » https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1263518696309313537 Ah lads, what the hell is going on?[/QUOTE Designed confusion. There's design involved there ?
Itssoeasy wrote: » I was reading trumps tweet about the so called illegal action of the Secretary of State of Michigan. It's bizarre as he says it was "done illegally and without authorisation" but the right to vote my mail is in the mighigan constitution since 2018 and the Secretary of State of a state are in charge of elections so surely a SOS had the authority to do this. Maybe I'm trying to inject logic into something where logic goes to die.
aloyisious wrote: » One for the U.S citizens: can you serve as a member of the Trump Admin Team [DNI] while serving as a congressman? I'm wondering, initially, how could it work if the new DNI John Ratcliffe [GOP C/man Texas] was to appear before the Congress Intelligence Committee. The senate has confirmed his appointment, reportedly on party vote lines. Does there have to be an election in Texas to replace him in the House or can a replacement nominee come internally from the GOP without getting a personal mandate from Texan voters? Would it be like here that the party can put in some-one from the faithful to fill the vacancy?
Foxtrol wrote: » You could do an endless number of them. Here he is yesterday showing that he doesn't have a clue what per capita meanshttps://twitter.com/Nicoxw1/status/1263244665647697921?s=20
Overheal wrote: » He has the nuclear codes. I’m too sober for this.
aloyisious wrote: » Gintonious wrote: » https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1263518696309313537 Ah lads, what the hell is going on? Designed confusion.
randomname2005 wrote: » Can there be a basic word understanding check in the debates, like fake, per capita, nasty and cofeve. Might get an explanation for the last one.
pixelburp wrote: » The nuclear codes has a chain of command and all sorts of failsafes, I don't fret about that; the really demented angle is that some think this demonstrably ignorant man is a successful, savvy businessman. One wonders if it weren't for his Manhattan portfolio where he might have ended up. Those tax returns must be a doozy to be so aggressively protected - no way he's as wealthy as he claims.
