Mantis Toboggan wrote: » There you go! I know plenty of people using zoom, I don't know anyone who's ever paid for it.
Living Off The Splash wrote: » I am sure you have heard the saying, Buy on Rumour and Sell on Fact. The problem is that everyone may be selling on fact, if figures are negative. You will have to join the queue. It might be better to sell now and bank your gains so far. From what you say some people have been selling on the upswing and happy to take whatever profit they have made. Many traders sell before results, ex dividend dates etc A bird in the hand etc....
lastusername wrote: » Yeah they've had hundreds of millions of additional users in the last couple 2-3 months but it all depends on how many they can turn into paid users. If insiders are selling then it doesn't exactly suggest they'll be reporting big numbers on that front come earnings. That's just a guess though, they could easily just be selling because they have obviously made a fortune! The share price could tank at earnings or could surge. I got in at $109 and current price is now around $175 so could easily sell, but almost fancy seeing if that surge does happen in early June...will see!
Living Off The Splash wrote: » Just look back at the Dot Com bubble. Companies that had never earned one cent were valued higher than CRH, a company that had producing cash profits for years. Many investors were worth millions on paper but never actually turned these millions in to cash. Some people did cash in and we all heard the stories of these guys buying vineyards etc on the millions that they made. Of course many people made money on the frenzy of activity. No harm in that. However there always comes a time to sell. I know that this is not a Dot Com situation but the point remains....if you are making a profit you are not making a loss. If you sell now and they continue to rise you will kick yourself. If you don't sell now and they drop you will kick yourself. Choose your exit price and be happy with your profit.
$185 by Friday. They're releasing their draft cryptographic design for end-to-end encryption on Friday which will create a lot of buzz, and it puts them on the way to becoming the most secure video conferencing service in the world.
Browney7 wrote: » Seen JD.com mentioned on here in the past - current valuation seems very lofty relative to earnings and other metrics. People still holding or taking profits at this stage?
(Bloomberg) -- Investors need to guard against violent price swings as markets become increasingly fragile, according to Bank of America Corp. Fragility has increased due to high-frequency traders shutting down machines as stress rises, which hurts liquidity, as well as by trend-chasing among investors reaching for better returns “against their better judgment in a world addicted to the central bank put,” BofA
MurDawg wrote: » Here we go again! MongoDB - Its riding pretty high right now, however, i have very high hopes for it to go much further. Most used NoSQL database and most popular database to use voted for by developers - its revenue keeps growing at a very impressive rate. Plans for 2020 seem huge. With Amazon being a major 2020 competitor for NoSQL I wouldn't be surprised to see Google sniffing around.
iQuestion wrote: » Thinking of investing 20,000 euros in DAL. If it were to return to pre-corona values (60) it would yield 300%.
peterofthebr wrote: » is DAL to big to fail? 20K is allot tied up on airlines.
Shedite27 wrote: » Luckin Coffee will start trading again this morning, down 40% in pre-hours
Diairist wrote: » There is also the problem of, as the Americans are calling it, destroying savings. As of about a week ago in California they had processed one in five 'covid19' (PPP) payment applications that were received .... in March.
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » Looks like they'll be de listed.
jams100 wrote: » What happens if they are de listed and you own shares?
Thargor wrote: » Do you think AMZN are just going to keep going? I have a good few but I'm wondering if I'm being an idiot and missing one of the shares you hold forever, have a fair pile of cash sitting there doing nothing aswell.
AmberGold wrote: » Is Amazon not a "hold forever" share at this stage, some analysts seem to think so. I've seen 10K per share mentioned.
zpehtsfd wrote: » That would give it a $5T valuation. That's like 20% of US GDP. :eek: I'm old enough to remember when Cisco and Intel were the "hold forever" companies. We are living in unparalleled times with massive buybacks, ZIRP and the Fed willing to do whatever it takes to prop this market. Nasdaq is right back to pre-COVID levels. Pure insanity. imo
Bob24 wrote: » I have had my eyes on them but since my assumption is that the overall market is about to experience a second leg of the dip I am waiting to see what the cruise operators are doing as part of this. Having said that, at the current prices they are already dirt cheap if you have a medium to long term timeline and are assuming they will likely survive, and IMO for someone who is ready to lose all their money in case they go bankrupt, the reward/risk ratio is already pretty good (there will be almost no earnings this year, but based on last years earnings they all have a P/E ratio below between 1.5 and 3 ... so if/when earnings return to historical levels the current share prices will be insanely low). Anyone going in should keep in mind that there is a little of a gamble in buying them though, as there is a really possibility of the companies going bankrupt and those shares becoming worthless (I believe some of them have used ship as collaterals for very high interest rate loans they need to survive while they can’t operate, which I think means that if the impossibly to sail lasts for too long they could lose their ships which would likely be used by new companies in better financial shape once the situation becomes more favourable).
jams100 wrote: » Whilst your probably right about the Nasdaq. Amazon would seem to be a good long term investment, 10k is a bit far fetched but 3-5k valuation in the next 3-5 years doesn't seem unrealistic to me
