SouthWesterly wrote: » Guys I finally put my blessed 5-1 up but it's not receiving data from the sensor. It's about 30 feet away from the base but is over a hedge(just). Does it need line of site. I can raise it if needed. I tried setting it up beside each other but still no joy. TIA
[Deleted User] wrote: » I don't know the system you're using, but is there a "sensor search" function to pair the sensors on first use? Or a channel selector at each end?
SouthWesterly wrote: » This onehttps://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B0170A47DI/ref=ppx_yo_mob_b_track_package_o0_img?ie=UTF8&psc=1 It has a scan function but not picking it up
[Deleted User] wrote: » A quick look at the manual and there is a LED on the remote sensor that flashes once every 12 seconds or so check that it is active, if not there could be an issue with the battery.
Marlow wrote: » For those who may be interested, the new generation of the Weatherflow Weatherstation is on Indiegogo: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/tempest-a-revolutionary-personal-weather-system Looks like their past ones had a good reputation. /M
Lu Tze wrote: » I'm not too well up on these, but have installed tipping bucket raingauges with data loggers before, and will be doing so again as part of my work. Just wondering if these can operate offline, can you download the data from them? Do they have a built in data logger? Or does it need to be connected to the internet?
Marlow wrote: » I looked at that, as my current one operates offline. These ones are wifi connected and I don't think will work offline out of the box. But they seem to be using a common weather broadcast protocol, so a local logger could maybe be implemented. I have ordered one and will see, how I get on. /M
Lu Tze wrote: » At the price, I would nearly consider one to see how it measures up. [...]
joujoujou wrote: » But I'm also interested in fetching data in offline mode, I'd prefer to collect, process and upload it myself. Think I'll ask few questions on their forum.
joujoujou wrote: » I am very tempted myself. Without any moving parts it'll probably be quite reliable. But I'm also interested in fetching data in offline mode, I'd prefer to collect, process and upload it myself. Think I'll ask few questions on their forum.
joujoujou wrote: » Read some FAQs and other things on their website and decided I will not go for it. Few reasons: - the only way you can set it up is through a smartphone app - I have no smartphone, I will not have one. - the only way it connects to a network is through wi-fi. I prefer all non-mobile devices to be wired. Sorry, not interested anymore.
Deleted User wrote: » I suspect that it would use multicasting back to a server somewhere, a bit like the owl energy monitoring system. With the Owl it was possible to intercept the multicast traffic with a raspberrypi and then chart it. At least that way you are free from the subscription that Owl wanted from you to view the data (from your own system).
Deleted User wrote: » I did a bit of digging and found this site,https://the-gadgeteer.com/2018/11/04/acurite-atlas-weather-station-review/ it appears that it uses the 433 MHz band, this is the 70cm amateur radio band that is also used by low powered devices such as remote door openers. So I don't see the frequency being an issue, maybe it fails on harmonics or something.
[Deleted User] wrote: » My dad would have just cut the cord from a defunkt electrical gadget, stripped and taped the wires to the pins and powered that way. Not that I would recommend this of course.
Marlow wrote: » Crude. Any odd key ... car keys are best ... in the earth lock, will let you force a continental connector into a UK plug. /M
garroff wrote: » Fahrenheit!!!