Better Than Christ wrote: » I'd revoke the driving licences of idiots who don't realise that if you want to overtake a slower vehicle, you need to wait until there's no oncoming traffic. A similar proportion of cars go around with no lights, one light or only their DLRs. I'd argue that in both cases (whether it's a poorly illuminated car or cyclist), anyone who fails to avoid hitting them should probably either have their eyes checked or learn to drive at a speed appropriate to their ability to react to hazards.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » At age 65, anyone with a full driving licence must redo a driving test, then again at age 70, and from age 72 onwards, must redo a driving test every 2 years. Failure to pass any of these tests results in loss of licence until a subsequent test can be passed again.
Strumms wrote: » In fairness, you’d see a whole lot less cars on the road if public transport was actually fit for purpose. The Luas sees the two lines interchangeable only at.....O Connell St. The Luas took almost 8 years from inception to the first scheduled departure. In 2011 the Metro for Dublin was given the go ahead, as of now... 2027 is the expected operational date. From being rubber stamped to the first metro thats 16 fûcking years.
In the first part of 2019 Dublin bus were fined 165,000 euros for failing to meet punctuality targets. They were set low targets and failed to meet them.
Better Than Christ wrote: » As far as infrastructure projects are concerned, basic double-decker buses are an efficient and relatively inexpensive way of moving large numbers of people around. Or at least they would be if they weren't competing for road space with cars. With hardly any traffic on the roads at the moment, bus journeys that used to take two hours can now be done in less than an hour.
Strumms wrote: » Buses won’t take cars off the road. An integrated and effective, ‘citywide’ public transport will though. But the organization and implementation of such in the city is taking almost half a lifetime, literally...a couple of lines..
[Deleted User] wrote: » Ban rugby....make hurling mandatory 1 hour a week minimum in all schools
Strumms wrote: » I doubt it could or would have the desired effect. People would just stockpile the previous couple of months... supermarkets would make a killing, pubs would take a battering. Also drinking at home especially with family on anything approaching regularity isn’t that healthy.
KaneToad wrote: » I'd ban hurling...make rugby mandatory.
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » I’d build the wall.
Deleted User wrote: » Rugby is not a proper sport, Only team sport in world,where fans cheer their own side for kicking ball out of play :pac: Theres literally no skill involved,in comparison to hurling