[Deleted User] wrote: » It's getting a bit insufferable when a certain user seems to literally make the exact same posts over and over again while showing no desire to engage in a discussion.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » You are twisting the manifesto of id2020.org and it's partners to your own disinformation campaign
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Sorry of this is all too much hard science all at once, for some to process. This proof of concept does not require any additional 'prediction', it's reality in itself.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » No. You are twisting the manifesto of id2020.org and it's partners to your own disinformation campaign, based on some skygod theology.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Knew it wouldn't be long before the less intelligent here (and the thankers of such) had to resort to some nonsense about the moon, lol. Previous to that there was flat earth, chemtrials, ufos, tv sci-fi, aleyjones and other very childish non-related spurious drivel.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Again, the "skygod theology" aspect is wholly irrelevant, I view this is a clear and malicious diversion from the topic, and will continue to ignore and call it out as such. 'predictions' of any type are simply 'interesting', much like horoscopes. When reality superseeds any theory, then it's a different ball game entirely..
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Reality: Already we have the clear set-out manifesto and objectives of the holding group (id2020.org).
Dohnjoe wrote: » You drench every post you make in false objectivity..
King Mob wrote: » But again, it's not a diversion. it's the source of your theory.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » But again, that's your theory (or attempt of anti-theory), it's not mine.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Yet another general insult you have posted
King Mob wrote: » Ok. So you are saying that you don't believe that the stuff you're talking about is the mark of the beast from the bible? Is this correct?
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » So you're asking about the belief of something that is now technically proven to exist in many tirals as entirely viable (buying and selling using a mark). If such a thing can exist, then gues what... it exists, yes? You disagree? The 'mark' e.g. QDT should not be consider to be a big ole beast, lol! It's a 'mark', however... it this new digital identifer mark can certainly be used for concepts of good, or for bad if you want to consider that (ask the lad that stamped serial numbers of folks arms, back in the 40's). The reality is, that the scope and breath of a Digital ID identifer (based on the hard science and reality of id2020.org and it's objectives, programs, partners, products and associations)... These all go well beyond anything written in a book 2,000yrs ago in terms of the simple concept of buying or selling. So is a lazy reference point going forward. The scope of this universal DigitalID program is way huge to say the least.
Dohnjoe wrote: » It's not a general insult, I'll ask the questions again
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Knew it wouldn't be long before the less intelligent here (and the thankers of such) had to resort to some nonsense about the moon, lol. Previous to that there was flat earth, chemtrials, ufos, tv sci-fi, aleyjones and other very childish non-related spurious drivel. Meanwhile back in the real world of actual science... BillGates is trying to claim personal global ownership of most likely vaccine candidate (by throwing $bn's at various labs). The technologist isn't even a virologist. - to get it out to all 7bn on the planet, in 30% of the previous quickest ever time of 5yrs. No three-phased trials, or scale up. Intsead small scale, to large total global manufacturing. What ever could go wrong, with the rejection of normal licensing? In line with id2020.org manifestohttps://id2020.org/digital-identity .
King Mob wrote: » Lol not only is this post kind of incomprehensible and nonsensical....
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I think you have proven your point Gates funded a Quantum Tattoo study. Microsoft is involved in ID20 likely with Gates support. Just explain why is its a conspiracy and we go from there. I know you explained some of it already. It's information overload at the moment and you need to explain the conspiracy.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » LOL, not only did you fail to answer the question set to you, you made a complete dodge of it.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Then to round it off, you've reverted back to (your own) theory about skygods woo-woo sci-fi and such like.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » My theory does not require such speculation, it's based on actual proven science and demonstration of such programs of Digital ID.
King Mob wrote: » But it's not my theory, it's yours. I'm not sure why you are lying and saying that it's my theory....
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » And I'll also ask the questions again If you look up id2020.org and all of its programs the 'Digital ID' concept is a clear. Is that all nonsense in your view?
Dohnjoe wrote: » I have already answered this question. But to address again, yes it's clear, it's a global digital ID project/program, and no I don't think it's "all nonsense".
Dohnjoe wrote: » If I look up digital ID and conspiracy theories I find a lot of religious prophecy, book of revelations stuff...
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Most of your first paragraph is entirely meaningless in this context (ufos, trump and so on) and bears no relevance, same goes for the 9/11 stuff. All totally off topic and honestly has no place here. There are various conspiracies at play in regards to 'Digital ID's for everyone'. I have outlined these all before, and in light of recent global changes (COVID from 2020 onwards), there is also a 'can-o-worms' factor in the rush to knock out 7bn vaccines (BillGates), without the normal rigours of due process. Q. Digital ID's for everyone? Is there a plan for everyone to be 'pushed' into having a new type of universal persistant DigitalID? A. YES, clearly - via id2020.org and it's projects, partners and programs. Within this main topic (the title of the thread) are sub-CTs incude: i) that the majority of people aren't aware of the project's existance, it's scope, ambitions and reach. ii) that the majority of people (of the few who are actually aware of the program) simply don't understand it (as proven here), it's workings, functionality i.e. 'it's form' or it's most likely, final realisation. iii) that the majority of people haven't even considered it's implications, it is being pushed as only 'good' thing, only. There has been zero debate as to if it's value or end results is only 'good thing'. It has (both) plus and minus aspects. additionally... iv) there are many that conspire to 'attach' the already clear published goals (of id2020.org and it's projects), to other wild, dramtic, non-related sci-fi theories, that have no basis. Lies infact. Not even worthy of responding to. This shoud be considered topic diversion and distortion of a very simple question (as per topic), of which hasn't yet been answered. In balance this project has both good and negative aspects. But as people are not aware, don't understand it, or it's implications, and with added diversion, these simple questions aren't even being considered. If there is any type of combo vaccine, that uses any type of unique identifer data mark in the near future, it will simply be too late to object to it.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Precisely.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » We already live in a digital world. The majority of the world carries around with them least one item of digital identification, it will have your picture, your address and various other details. I don’t think human beings are numb to what digital ID is the understand the concept. What scares you they pushing for a digital form of ID that removes the need for multiple digital systems? Are Am I Right in saying this is true? This one ID links up to one controlled database somewhere? I will say the majority of people are not aware of many things, it does not mean the people be in the dark for long. They’re going to notice, the banks, hospitals, government bodies’ rolling out a one fits all digital ID for everyone to use. Something that big will be noticed immediately. I think the education will be everywhere if something like this ever comes about. People will be better informed if there a rollout and lot more people will be making new threads discussing it and you’ll be reading the negatives and positives online. I not sure I agree with you people have not thought about the possibility of misuse. You have. So there likely many others who have also as well in public life. The issue for me is do you want your life controlled by a one fits all digital ID- what happens if the use it for credit score like China does where you have to obey the rules online and be a good citizen and not voice displeasure about things. You basically become a robot then with no free will. A digital ID in the body will be something else entirely and that not coming out any time soon. I think there lot of privacy concerns already and there is always people who will take advantage of it though.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Do you believe the "devil" is involved with digital ID?
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » Can agree with much of that, China is a perfect example (perhaps closer would be the folks that got serial numbers stamped back in the 40's). Folks aware of it, have little to be scared of. For the more holy type folks, who knows, they might actually welcome this, if they view it as some sort of fulfilment. Even then China relies wholly on FRS's which are very tame, compared to the potential of a fully-fledged DigitalID system (x16 biometrics and any/all user data digitised), then 'paired' with a UnID (unique serial identifer), compressed 16kb, encrypted and stored on an Azure cloud db (blockchain won't always be un-hackable btw). The removes the need for any other paper/card even national IDs (is a global program). Removes the need for cash, instantly. Removes any concept of privacy and so on. China factor x100, with it's postive and negtive factors (both multiplied). Subtle embodiment technology already exists now, and it's perfect vehicle is actually the 7billion doses of vaccine coming within 18mths.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » But. it's. not. my. theory, so. then. it. must. only. be. yours. As 'you' keep raising it, comprende???
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » id2020.org are involved with DigitalID's, (are 'they' the divil, who knows lol), and that simply is all there is to consider here.
Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: » But. it's. not. my. theory, so. then. it. must. only. be. yours. As 'you' keep raising it, comprende??? Clearly it's a diversion tactic for you to keep distorting the actions of id2020 and attaching it to 'le supernatural' This isn't required, their own manifesto is sufficent all in itself.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » i would be happy to quote your posts in the christianity forum where you make the link between the two to jog your memory if that helps.
As Joseph Goebbels used to say "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear".