BrianBoru00 wrote: » People aren't making a decision to go to Dingle over tipp town. People are choosing to relocate out of Dublin to the town's they grew up in or close by. They don't isolate from their community .they become more involved . They don't typically make two Aldi trips a week. If might surprise you but a large proportion of people who grew up in portumna would like to live in Portumna as adults. Likewise with inis oirr , with kanturk, with kilbeggan. A combination of who they marry or where they work has an impact and if you're a nurse from nenagh in at Vincent's married to a Garda from manor Hamilton based in store street you re not going to live in portlaoise. But once you've had children your forced to consider your options and the benefits of choosing (in this example) north tipp or north Leitrim to move to. I'm not optimistic of any forward thinking on the part of the government/public service to de centralise but it is something that would be embraced e
snotboogie wrote: » My point is that there are not enough desirable towns to drive this idillic ruralization. Irish people who move back to "de country" overwhelmingly move to big one off houses and not to villages or towns. There is nothing to suggest that Covid will change this. Not sure what you many by forward thinking as all studies suggest that we need to urbanize more rather than embrace decentralisation
BrianBoru00 wrote: » And I m saying that example is not in any way ideal. ...
snotboogie wrote: » I have no faith in wfh "saving rural Ireland" there very few scenic small towns like Dingle. For every Kenmare and Bantry there are 10 Tipp Towns and Fermoys. People don't want to live in small town Ireland and if a wfh gets people out of Dublin, Cork and Galway it will mostly be to one off houses in the middle of nowhere. Two trips a week to the local Aldi 10 miles away won't save rural Ireland. It will encourage people to retreat into the own families and isolate from community.
beauf wrote: » I could reply with a litany of things that can happen to make that unworkable on a daily basis. But since you think it's a solely scheduling issue I know it would fall on deaf ears. You've also left out a ton of stuff. Nothing to do with working from home. Working from home is great if you have the facilities and it suits.
BrianBoru00 wrote: » The irony of you using "deaf ears" �� I neither said nor implied it was solely a scheduling issue.
Cyrus wrote: » I’m struggling to see what point you are making ? You presented a non workable timetable as a solution and then basically admitted it was unworkable ! No one is going to move down the country if that’s whats waiting for them
BrianBoru00 wrote: » ...believe it or not it is and currently being done by a number of people. I know one of them and that's their schedule and would have been.....
Sunny Disposition wrote: » Economics are now going to work against cities, not just in Ireland, everywhere. It’s not down to Covid-19, that might even delay it as people thinking working from home is more difficult than it actually is, because they have no childcare right now. In an Irish context a Donegal based office worker can do their job for a lower price than a Dublin one, because of the price of property in the two counties. The winners in the short term will be employers for certain as well as workers who live or want to live in rural areas. The big losers will be commercial property owners in cities. It’s not just Ireland, the so-called flyover States in America now have advantages no one saw until the last few years for example. Not strictly working from home, but learning from home is going to be way more prevalent, would expect very few people studying part time to go to physical classes in the future.
BrianBoru00 wrote: » You re not reading the posts then. . It's not non workable . It's hectic but believe it or not it is and currently being done by a number of people. I know one of them and that's their schedule and would have been. In September they would have had it becoming easier as their youngest is moving into primary school. They make it work. It's nothing to do with moving down the country. I didn't say it was. You're unable or unwilling to read posts and deliberately conflating points trying to make a different argument
dubrov wrote: » It's not sustainable for any longer than 2 weeks without a breakdown
beauf wrote: » I don't think people will accept different wages doing the same job. Especially not in a unionised environment. The private sector will always be you get what you negotiate, and in that situation you are probably aware of the going market rate for the job and what you are worth. As for remote learning, that only goes so far. Classroom is a richer experience, even from a social level, networking, to experience a different environment etc.
salonfire wrote: » Now that the world knows how relatively well working remotely can function, there is a whole sub-continent that will aim itself to take your IT job off-shore. Be very careful of advocating how well remote working is
Sunny Disposition wrote: » Public sector is different for sure, but surely you know labour costs in the West are much lower than Dublin? That means people being paid less than they would be for the same job in Dublin. Business can exploit that now. This will have huge implications, many obvious positives for rural dwellers but perhaps negatives we can’t see yet. It’s true about classroom learning and that’s why full time education may continue in the old way a bit longer, I think. Eighteen year olds love the idea of college and young people generally find it great craic. But slightly older people studying part time will do it online.
Sconsey wrote: » I have worked in IT for the last 20 years, outsourcing jobs to lower cost countries is part and parcel of the business. The fact that people can successfully work remotely is not news either.
Sconsey wrote: » The fact that people can successfully work remotely is not news either.
BrianBoru00 wrote: » For you.
Deleted User wrote: » Why hasn't more of it been done if that the case.
dubrov wrote: » You obviously don't have kids if you think that schedule is doable long term. Long term commuting is doable long-term although may lead to a poor quality of life
BrianBoru00 wrote: » Again, for you. People are doing that type of schedule. The fact that you're not aware of them doesn't change the fact.