jimmytwotimes 2013 wrote: » Would it have killed him to say "we hope the LC will proceed as planned" but then you wouldn't tune in to see him on the Late Late.
happywithlife wrote: » https://www.education.ie/en/Press-Events/Press-Releases/2020-press-releases/PR20-05-01a.html8 Dept issused this press relkease earlier in the afternoon. Met the various stakeholders today and they are meeting next Wed (6th May) don't think we'll have anything offical (apart from leaks) before then
Rosita wrote: » I'd say he meant school opening in general will be September. In other words they will not open in May. I doubt the LC arrangements are meant to have changed. It would be unusual in the current context not to have a government statement which wasn't ambiguous and confusing in part at least.
km79 wrote: » “Schools and colleges will not reopen until start of next academic year in September /October “ Leo Well then ......
khalessi wrote: » There could be a hiccup in this as a study just published by The Lancet in Britain, based on a study carried out by researchers in China in conjunction with Joh fns Hopkins University, found that children can catch and spread it just as easily as adults. I think it is just like playing Chess or something with this virus. For every 2 steps forward we get knocked two steps back I can provide link to lancet if you want to read the summary
Chaya Fresh Shoehorn wrote: » I think it's fanciful, or at best wishful thinking, to even consider that schools will be providing any sort of masks or PPE to staff or students! The students are considered low risk in general, so there just won't be any major concern or pressure to implement significant safety precautions once any sort of reopening is in place.
pandoraj09 wrote: » We'd a zoom meeting this morning re the Junior Cert arrangements and someone brought up the amount of money needed on a school by school basis just to provide fresh face masks to everyone in the building every day, as well as any other PPE needed.
km79 wrote: » Leo laying out the “roadmap “ tomorrow Have a feeling another holiday weekend is about to be ruined
bren2001 wrote: » Firstly, classes operating with social distancing is far easier than exam centres. Class sizes are 20-30 (?), so using the large hall in a school, classes can be staggered. Nowhere does it say all students will be in at once. Secondly, in the interest of clarity and fairness, a decision had to be made several weeks ago on the postponement of the LC. We were in no position to know what the situation would be in June and it was believed that running the LC would be a non-runner in June (and still is imo).
Rosita wrote: » Yet again the prospect of LCs back in school in May is raised.https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/coronavirus/leaked-proposed-timetable-for-return-to-normal-life-in-ireland/ar-BB13pjUJ?ocid=spartanntp Again, if this can be done why was the LC deferred?
ethical wrote: » I feel really sorry for all the JC students (and teachers!) that have worked flat out since March 12th only to be told now that the work after March 12th should not be considered!!!!! So for the student (or teacher !) that didnt bother their backside,no harm done! (Of course the ETB "confidence and supply" form or was it "protection & accountability",so many box ticking feckin forms now, will catch the teacher out!!!)
mirrorwall14 wrote: » Since when is work during the lock down not being considered? Source?
rainbowtrout wrote: » Schools like Claregalway will have to adjust their plans. Maybe the Dept don’t like being told how to run things by rogue principals
km79 wrote: » Point 3 is very very interesting for schools going ahead with exams
Shn99 wrote: » Emma o Kelly on RTE news saying "if they can do PGs for the JC then one would wonder can they do it for the LC"