Silentcorner wrote: » Because I'm not the leader of this country....so...I have the time to be spending arguing with people on the internet.... You have...you have outsmarted me....I'll buy your disinfectant ...
randomname2005 wrote: » Not what I said. I never came close to saying that 63 million people were insane. I said some people would always vote republican based on beliefs, having always voted that way, etc. I said others voted to give him a chance. I said they would be insane to vote for him again and expect something different. If they are happy with what he has done, the increase in deficit, the increase in corruption, the decrease in democracy then voting for him and expect the same would not be insane. It would only be insane if they expected it to be different.
Silentcorner wrote: » Oh will you cop yourself on.... Media companies rang them to get a statement off them....jesus christ, are you that niave.... I mean, do you think that Dettol and Lysol are the only companies on the planet who sell disinfectant...why aren't the rest of them making statements, do you think they are in on it? Maybe Trump is on commission....what do you think? The Russians possibly own disinfectant plants, Trump is a Russian agent...maybe that is it!!! I'm sure someone smarter than me will figure it out!!!
Lysol and Dettol manufacturer tells customers not to inject disinfectants as possible treatment for COVID-19
notobtuse wrote: » Was locking Hillary up a campaign promise or a campaign slogan? He's building the wall and fighting hard to get more built.
Carfacemandog wrote: » So do you think his science advisors agrees or disagreed with him? If you feel they agreed with him, do you also think injecting bleach is a good idea? If you think they disagreed with him, do you think he or they are correct here, e.g. do you think injecting bleach would be a good or bad idea? If you think they only decided to disagree with him after the fact, why is he surrounding himself with these types of people when he was supposed to get 'only the best people'.
Silentcorner wrote: » Perhaps, as we are talking about 63 million people who live in their very own separate democracy to us, we let them decide without assuming they are all or even a percentage of them are morons or insane...we are in no position to judge anyone. It took a lot of disenfranchised American to get someone like Trump elected, I am not having a go at you, but I hate the way we refer to these human beings, we all knew exactly what he meant when he started talking about the swamp... Unlike most on this thread anyway, my trust in media as an industry has long gone, you are much more likely to be misinformed in todays media culture than ever before....
Silentcorner wrote: » The US army or the Russian army?
notobtuse wrote: » Comprehension seems to be quite lacking today. I don't get it. For what... the third time now... I said if his science advisors disagreed with him they should have said so when he asked them during the conference... not later - clarifying things. That's all I said. I hope that will be the last time I have to say that, but I highly, highly doubt it. Trump Derangement Syndrome is sad, really.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Amazing how so easily so many people can all seamlessly begin expressing faux outrage. They have 'being disingenuous in unison' down to a fine art. The liberal hive mind in effect.
notobtuse wrote: » Was locking Hillary up a campaign promise or a campaign slogan? He's building the wall and fighting hard to get more built. He reduced some corruption, and has and is taking measures to remove waste in government which will get rid of more, but fact remains the Deep State continues to be entrenched and powerful. Hopefully Barr and Durham's indictments will help to cull even more of them and scare the ones who remain into the realization that it's not them who run the country.
randomname2005 wrote: » I am not doubting for any length of time that there are disenfranchised Americans, as there are disenfranchised people in every country. Look at what I am saying, I am not calling people stupid. I am saying that people expecting him to be different if he gets elected again are insane.
Carfacemandog wrote: » Promise. "If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation." Hows that going for him?
notobtuse wrote: » Barr and Durham haven't finished, yet. Did you not read where earlier today I noted that Durham is expanding his team with both agents and a big addition to the prosecutorial team involved with all the illegalities against Trump during the campaign and what is often referred to as a soft coup against Trump after he became president? I’d say it is going rather well, but too slow.
Silentcorner wrote: » But...if they vote for him again...maybe they feel he has delivered...maybe they are misinformed...maybe you are misinformed...lets leave it up to them.
MadYaker wrote: » You must have missed the Horowitz report?
[Deleted User] wrote: » None of us are casting votes for Americans....but we're entirely free to discuss the ramifications of his behaviour. Also I'm guessing plenty on here have US family members or friends. So pretty logical that a nation we have plenty of ties with is something that will be discussed...
RobertKK wrote: » On my news alert: They obviously fear people are stupid enough to listen to Dr Trump.
Bowie wrote: » Trump floated the idea of disinfectant injections and supports mass close quarters protest. I'd be pretty outraged if I were American.
MadYaker wrote: » No we didn’t know what he meant by drain the swamp because he never defined it so how could we know what he meant? People decided what they wanted it to mean and went with that. What do you think he meant? Do you think he achieved it? He pulled in a lot of disenfranchised voters but he’s done absolutely nothing to hold on to them and his approval ratings are now tanking. He’s the worse president they have had by a country mile. You’d have to wonder about any Americans who still support him. Do they hate their country or can they just not see the damage he’s doing?
Deleted User wrote: » None of us are casting votes for Americans....but we're entirely free to discuss the ramifications of his behaviour. Also I'm guessing plenty on here have US family members or friends. So pretty logical that a nation we have plenty of ties with is something that will be discussed...
Outlaw Pete wrote: » He asked a question and if you think the following faux hand wringing show of concern is anything more than opportunism, then you're being extremely naive.https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1253697753479331840 As to saying he supports close quarter protesting, not the case. In the following clip he speaks of them and references the fact that in the clips he seen they were socially distancing and that that was "good":https://www.politico.com/video/2020/04/21/trump-lockdown-protest-social-distancing-072609 He also condemned the governor over the last two days for going against CDC guidelines when he chose to open businesses like barbers, tattoo parlors, so that clearly shows that he does not approve of states going against the social distancing guidelines set out by the CDC. All this is ignored of course in favour of selective out of context quoting so that they can make the man appear as if he is deranged. As I always say, if you have to keep misrepresenting someone and quoting them out of context, in an effort to make them look bad, well then they can't be as bad as they are being portrayed to be, as otherwise the people doing it wouldn't bother. That it happens is indicative of it having to happen to fit a narrative. A narrative which it seems can't be supported with the truth.
Silentcorner wrote: » And we are also free to discuss the ramifications of the behaviour of the media industry that is whipping people into frenzies by largely removing context from as many statements as possible.
Deleted User wrote: » His statement hasn't been remotely misrepresented...
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
