Shefwedfan wrote: » The person has 30,000 posts....they are on boards 24 x 7, 7 days a week. From what i can see the majority are on this forum. It would be a needle in a hay stack trying to find the post. He made reference to living in Lisnaskea. Last time I checked, Lisnaskea is in Fermanagh which is in the North of Ireland. I expect some story now to say why that's not true.
Shefwedfan wrote: » It wasn't about visiting.... Funny how Francie didn't respond and you did?
Dr Marcus de Brun has described the management of the crisis as "the biggest political blunders in the history of the Irish State".
Shefwedfan wrote: » Just another change to suit your posting.... Like a few on here depending on what day of the week it is and the wind blowing it changes to suit.....issues is some people have very very good memories!!! The 3 posters on here, all SF fans, all constantly tripping themselves up because they cant remember what you posted on a previous thread Really you should get your story straight It is a pity we couldnt put a sticky post at the top with XYZ: SF agenda.....might save new posters coming in and having to listen to it all again befoire they realize
FrancieBrady wrote: » One of Simon's appointees resigning isn't a great sign. No doubt another long running tribunal in the offing. They seem to have gotten the entire nursing home strategy wrong.https://www.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/prominent-doctor-appointed-by-simon-harris-to-medical-board-resigns-over-coronavirus-crisis-in-nursing-homes-39141161.html
Bowie wrote: » You read like a Trump supporter. Anyone with an opinion that differs from your own is part of some left wing block conspiracy. How about you take people on their comments and leave the juvenile supposition to the Republicans? Comment on the comments not your imaginings on where they are coming from, it's more interesting that way. [INSERT 'I know you are what am I?' response]
Bowie wrote: » Be interesting to see who takes the Queen's shilling and signs up to the likely FF/FG-Tan government.
Shefwedfan wrote: » For a FG thread, we have you, Francie, McMurphy and smurgen with the majority of the post. Anyone post anything non negative towards FG(myself, Blanch or anyone) and they are subjected to page and pages from all of you on why FG are sh*t.....also get all sorts of accusation Finbots etc. I have yet to see a single post from any of your posters that is balanced. Every single post is attack, just look at the last few posts, between the lot of you trying to outdo each other on a more critical post on FG....even the only valid post about the Dr De Brun was lost in the noise with your stupid pictures post I have said I am no FG supporter, but maybe people would like a balanced discussion for once, that is not possible for anyone. You mention Trump but isn't that exactly Trump politics? just shout at everyone till they give up and walk away.... Want an example of this: That post is the height of stupidity......but a good example of the quality of posts from you lot
Bowie wrote: » People are critical of FG and comment on it in a FG thread. Shocker. The point is people are giving items they are critical about. Explaining their issues. You seem more interested in who is posting and how often they post and how quicky they respond to your comments. Which has zero to do with taking comments on board and responding on topic. So you keep on trucking.....
Shefwedfan wrote: » Lets review your input again:Be interesting to see who takes the Queen's shilling and signs up to the likely FF/FG-Tan government. I am interested in discussion the topics and how the government are doing, not page and pages of waffle from a couple of deranged SF supporters. Thats just one example of your input, tell you what, point me in the direction of a balanced post from yourself in this thread, just one
Bowie wrote: » That's not true. You don't like the comments you are seeing and complaining about it.
Mortelaro wrote: » Tbh,I'd say he doesn't give a sho1te Theres a few threads on this forum that are effectively a blog Subscriber level to said blog's microscopic
FrancieBrady wrote: » Of course he/she does, as do a few others who seem to patrol threads to berate those who are critical of a government party they are 'not' supporters/members of. Why would you be bothered? I make no bones about voting SF at the last election...am I on all the threads criticising SF or berating people just for voicing opinions on them...no, I'm not.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Well done minions, you just proved exactly what I posted.... Couldn’t even find a single balanced post Bowie?? Not even one of you tried to defend the rubbish you post on here....why don’t you just create your own thread? At least then everyone else can have a adult discussion then Again I’m not a supporter of FG, so using that as an excuse doesn’t stand up
McMurphy wrote: » It's an internet discussion site, you realise if people stopped posting the site would dwindle and eventually die off, yeah? This is only one thread on a fairly big site, if what's posted on it is annoying to you, do what I do and make a conscious decision to not post in it.
Mortelaro wrote: » Facts are in this blog thread 4 out of the top 6 posters are Shinners Top Shinner account has 4 times the posts of the top anti shinner on the forum and 5 or 6 times the posts in it of any of the fine Gaelish accounts Patrol? They don't give a sho1te There are 1 or 2 trolls of course in both camps Great play ground for them tbf.
Mortelaro wrote: » I don't think this site has ever made money The bulletin board formats time has been up too for quite a while
McMurphy wrote: » Why do you keep insisting on telling us that you're not a FG member or supporter, who cares if you are? It doesn't make what you're posting any less nonsensical. You just accused us as being minions, and assume everyone is a Shinner, because they criticize FG, isn't that the kettle calling the teapot black ass? And you also keep going on about fair and balanced posts, this isn't RTE or the Garda press association, there's no onus on anyone here to construct fair impartial and balanced posts towards FG, of there was an onus on fair, impartial and balanced posts, blanch for example would have to give up his perpetual 24/7 Sinn Fein attacks, which incidentally I don't see you calling him out on, seeing as you're all about fair and balancing posts now. It's an internet discussion site, you realise if people stopped posting the site would dwindle and eventually die off, yeah? This is only one thread on a fairly big site, if what's posted on it is annoying to you, do what I do and make a conscious decision to not post in it. Irony though.
Bowie wrote: » Facts are my comment was a fair observation. Here you are assigning party allegiance and complaining about the comments posted rather than commenting on the topics. There's a Greta Thurnberg thread. I've little interest in what many say in it. I haven't posted there in a long time. I don't see the point in going in there to analyse the reasoning behind why some might be posting there. You've seemingly little to no interest in discussing topics people have been raising about FG in this FG thread. And there we have it. Shefwedfan will be along shortly to chastise you.
Shefwedfan wrote: » I keep posting I’m not FG because that seems to be the only rebuttal fired at everyone, I can’t count how many times you couple of posters have referred to people as finbots Problem is any thread which is remotely got anything to do with FG it’s the exact same as this one. It’s the exact same poster, posting the exact same thing Didn’t you post earlier on that you couldn’t remember which thread you had posted an answer to? I agree this is an Internet forum, so everyone should be allowed to have a discussion, especially about the government without having to wade though pages and pages of s**t from the same posters with no purpose to any of it So yes this is one thread in a forum of thousands but if I start up a thread about FG tomorrow or even FF, it will be the exact same posters with the exact same dribble on it
Shefwedfan wrote: » This is what you call topics is it? “Be interesting to see who takes the Queen's shilling and signs up to the likely FF/FG-Tan government“ This is a great example of your topics, who exactly are you expecting to be interested in discussing statement like that?
Mortelaro wrote: » I think now Bowie I've commented a lot on issues raised in this thread Your last photo op post, what exactly did you want me to say to that one? Should leo not visit troops on the ground so to speak at all is that your point? Or was it other world leaders don't I won't google photos of the latter for you, you can do that yourself I tell you what I will do though for now,unsubscribe from this thread as tbh,there are more interesting fora This one and others when they contain posts you can guess the content of by the 3 or 4 who posted them is getting very Boring.
Shefwedfan wrote: » who exactly are you expecting to be interested in discussing statement like that?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Clearly you are, as you are the only one commenting on it.
