Sean.3516 wrote: » Wouldn't both parties be better served if we were to re-organise our school system so that all public schools are secular, while all religious schools must be run on a private basis.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » So you think religious parents should pay for their kids education, and pay taxes to educate your kids too?
one world order wrote: » Teaching the young about God is the single most important gift a child will receive in school.
So much learned in school does not stand as you become an adult, storing up knowledge in your short term memory for an exam that is quickly forgotten. This world brings greed, envy, sexual immorality, bitterness, hatred and makes many people lost as society is obsessed with money, possessions and looks. Some people don't want to accept they are a sinner and in need of salvation like everyone else. They hate God and hate the fact religion is thought in school. God sent his son into this world to take the punishment for our sins by dying on the cross. He gave us the holy spirit to change our sinful hearts and battle the temptations this world throws at us. God and the devil are real, demons, angels and hell are all real. We all have a soul and it is important to realise there will be a time of judgement for everyone, both the godly and ungodly.
[Deleted User] wrote: » God no, Logical and critical thinking is the most important gift a child can receive in school. And I'm saying that as someone who believes in God. And... you've proven exactly why logical and critical thinking is a far greater gift. Frankly, your philosophy is horrible. Thankfully, it doesn't reflect religion outside of the nutcases in the US or Opus Dei.
Salary Negotiator wrote: » There’s a reason religious orders are so keen to indoctrinate kids when they are young. It’s because as they get older and learn logic and critical thinking it becomes harder to believe in a god.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I disagree. I received both a Marist Brothers and Jesuit education... They sought to impart the ability to understand logical thinking. Religious orders do change over time.. and they're not equal in fanatical thinking.
one world order wrote: » Teaching the young about God is the single most important gift a child will receive in school. So much learned in school does not stand as you become an adult, storing up knowledge in your short term memory for an exam that is quickly forgotten. This world brings greed, envy, sexual immorality, bitterness, hatred and makes many people lost as society is obsessed with money, possessions and looks. Some people don't want to accept they are a sinner and in need of salvation like everyone else. They hate God and hate the fact religion is thought in school. God sent his son into this world to take the punishment for our sins by dying on the cross. He gave us the holy spirit to change our sinful hearts and battle the temptations this world throws at us. God and the devil are real, demons, angels and hell are all real. We all have a soul and it is important to realise there will be a time of judgement for everyone, both the godly and ungodly.
one world order wrote: » It is harder to be an atheist than believe in God's existence. It is scientifically impossible to create everything from nothing. Some ungodly people have tried to push the theory we evolved from apes. If you question them they say the apes evolved from fish, that came from bacteria, that came from atoms that came from nothing. So the seas, mountains, animals, humans and all God's creation came from nothing, just some bacteria somewhere. Does this sound logical?
Deleted User wrote: » I wouldn't want religious schools to have that degree of freedom anymore... especially once we start seeing schools being set up and run by other religions such as Islam. The RCC was bad enough.
Geuze wrote: » There are Jewish and Muslin primary schools in Ireland.
statesaver wrote: » One of these schools will have a tolerant, inclusive and liberal outlook and the other will not.
Vestiapx wrote: » Who made God?
Deleted User wrote: » State funding means that there is oversight into the running of the school. Being private means that they have a greater degree of freedom to manage it the way they want.
Deleted User wrote: » I wouldn't want religious schools to have that degree of freedom anymore... especially once we start seeing schools being set up and run by other religions such as Islam. The RCC was bad enough. So. Nope.
Deleted User wrote: » I disagree. I received both a Marist Brothers and Jesuit education... They sought to impart the ability to understand logical thinking. Religious orders do change over time.. and they're not equal in fanatical thinking.
McGiver wrote: » Religious schools must be private.
Geuze wrote: » Isn't this already the case? The vast majority of primary schools are already private, and always have been. They are owned by Educate Together, the diocese, the Church of Ireland, the Jews, the Muslims, etc. There are a handful of public primary schools, owned by the ETBs.