McMurphy wrote: » You where literally on here just days ago saying you witnessed her at an online Easter commemoration. She withdrew from public life while also appearing in public life. I imagine you typed out the word "disingenuous" above without a shred of irony of guilt.
McMurphy wrote: » Temporary or permanent makes little difference to me - you stated quite clearly that left wing policies were the last thing the country needed, now after realising what an asshat of a post it was are saying - oh yeah actually we do need left wing policies but just as a temporary measure. So to sum it up the last thing the country needs right now is left wing policies except the left wing policies the govt just implemented because they don't count because they're temporary. Looks like the very first thing to be implemented were left wing policies. Have a word with yourself aido.
Deleted User wrote: » Well like yes,your mocking and sneering at people who have isolated,because they have coronavirus and developed pluericy is patethic....i have no issue owning those words?? Indeed id go as far to.call them.scumbag posts.....could likely go further and say truth,but id likely be banned
McMurphy wrote: » Who is suggesting otherwise? During the pandemic the very first measures introduced had a fairly strong left wing flavour coming of them, short term, medium term or ongoing indefinitely doesn't matter a toss.
The govt have done well in some aspects of their response to this crisis, and oddly enough both right wingers and left wingers alike will be championing the left wing response. just as was pointed out earlier, the idiotic left wing policies that would ruin the country suddenly stop being idiotic and disastrous .
Mortelaro wrote: » But the pandemic crisis response isn't an economic policy It's an insurance pay out specially legislated to combat an emergency
Mortelaro wrote: » I don't know what is going to happen in terms of response as the year goes on but I'd imagine the trend in response will be to support the economy's journey back as close to pre crisis levels eventually as soon as circumstances allows A continuous €350 payment is not likely, I'd expect it to be stepped back as jobs return
[Deleted User] wrote: » Tbf the e350 a week to drop down to e203 a week after 12 weeks should be looked into long term It would provide great income security for low paid workers in tourism/agri etc sectors as these can have slow periods,where staff are often left go and re-hired seasonally (perhaps a slightly higher prsi rate could apply?) And differentiate from those with poor job security and those who just wont work
aido79 wrote: » I think you know that I meant long term implementation of left wing policies. These are temporary measures so make of them what you will. During this pandemic the last thing the country needs is actually a bigger left right divide which is what Sinn Fein seem to be pushing for which is a big change from their original call for a unity government.
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Do you think circumstances during a pandemic are different to "normal times"?
McMurphy wrote: » Temporary or permanent makes little difference to me - you stated quite clearly that left wing policies were the last thing the country needed, now after realising what an asshat of a post it was are saying - oh yeah actually we do need left wing policies but just as a temporary measure. So to sum it up the last thing the country needs right now is left wing policies except the left wing policies the govt just implemented because they don't count because they're temporary. Have a word with yourself aido.
aido79 wrote: » These are temporary measures in the middle of a pandemic. It's a little different from the way you are trying to paint it. Try to think of it in terms of "small" and "far away" and you might have a better understanding of it.
[Deleted User] wrote: » but she can get her pints across clearly and relative ease
McMurphy wrote: » Nationalising the private hospitals seems very left wing politics to me - likewise the Social Welfare measures introduced. You're hardly arguing against these measures are you aido Are you suggesting the govt are making mistakes? Discuss.
all about the mane wrote: » But coveney did see the need to make the public aware. Right decision.
thomasdylan wrote: » Saoirse McHugh? She's seen as a liability. She can't go a few days without saying or tweeting something stupid.
Mortelaro wrote: » Coveny wasnt persistently sick and didnt get pleurisy He was negative actually iirc Coronovirus is a nasty illness and worrying even in mild to moderate cases because of its unpleasantness and not knowing where it's going with you when you are sick with it Please behave Theres enough codology around here without adding to it
all about the mane wrote: » Both Mary lou and Coveney had to be tested. See the different approaches taken,
all about the mane wrote: » You are the one who said it was pathetic. What is it? ‘Own your words’
[Deleted User] wrote: » Meh,not quite as patethic as defending what your trying to defend I mean you can interpet that as patethic,if you wish.....but your essentially admitting to being more patethic (personally id be morto to stoop.that low to try scrape a victory,but each to.their own)
all about the mane wrote: » But you admit it is pathetic
Mortelaro wrote: » Would you be going on the same if Leo had the virus and was sick? No you wouldn't Stop trolling and going on with the sho1te talk It's stupid
[Deleted User] wrote: » Meh....still not quiet as patethic as sneering and mocking people for isolating with coronavirus imo
all about the mane wrote: » Mary loo, What did you do in the biggest crisis to ever face the nation? A bit of facebookin!
[Deleted User] wrote: » Mary lou done easter commerations on facebook (looked v.poorly too),heard her on 2fm interviewed from her house and engaged on insta aswell?? She didnt disappear...just not on the media you consume? (Gonna go out and guess your not in target market for her/voters sf target under her leadership)