K.O.Kiki wrote: » Take the 2060 Super, apply an overclock and you get ~7.5% more performance, putting it right against the 5700 XT. And of course, since none of us are using an i9-9900K it's all academic anyway. So I am recommending Nvidia on current feature set (and driver stability).
K.O.Kiki wrote: » It's not worse - they're equal. Really just a matter of "do you want to try ray-tracing / will your games support DLSS?" If nothing else, if you want to play the rather good Control, Nvidia is the way to go. However, you're right in that AMD offer better value - the Sapphire Pulse & PowerColor Red Devil are good XT models.
MidlanderMan wrote: » No real interest in RT at the minute and need to have a look at DLSS 2.0 before commenting on that particular tech but wasn't impressed with the first version. I was really hoping the 2070 would drop significantly in price to be competitive with the 5700xt as I'd actually prefer an Nvidia card for things like driver stability, noise/temp levels, and they tend to have more and better looking options when compared to AMD. Alas. It hasn't happened yet.
MidlanderMan wrote: » You'd pay more for a worse card because it gets close when overclocking? That seems a bit weird to me?
Serephucus wrote: » Rumour is the 3000 series is coming at some point over the Summer. No specifics yet. That's likely to be another 900 -> 1000 series jump. Just throwing that out there as the waiting option. I'm stick rocking a 1070 myself because the current generation is a little meh. That said, the 5700 XT is definitely the best bang/buck at the mo, so if I were upgrading, it would be that.