biko wrote: » The video is new, the SF bashing is old.
uch wrote: » Nah Ad is an old one, seen it in the 90's but agree it is a SF basher, no mention of the left footers doing the same
coinop wrote: » Like Leo says, they're not a normal party.
banie01 wrote: » @OP When does the political arm of any revolutionary movement become politically acceptable? If a political party is born of revolutionary or freedom movement armed groups and in the course of building a peace that movement commits to peace? When does that party then become part of the establishment? In the case of northern politics, is it not hypocritical to expect Unionists to cooperate with SF in Stormont? Whilst the Civil War successor parties here treat them as pariahs in our Dail?
JohnnyFlash wrote: » When they stop singing songs about and glorifying a group that blew up innocent people, shot people dead based on their religion, and murdered members of the Gardaí. When they start to call the Republic by its proper title. When they stop putting forward psychopaths like Dessie Ellis to run for the Dáil. Northern Ireland is an economic, social and political basket case. Anything that goes on up there is due to circumstances.
Zebra3 wrote: » And yet we have FFFG and the likes of Labour having no issue with the US using Ireland to commit war crimes.
Greyfox wrote: » As it happens it's because of people like you that I'm going to vote for SF in future,
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Look over there! It’s a bird!
JohnnyFlash wrote: » . Northern Ireland is an economic, social and political basket case. Anything that goes on up there is due to circumstances.
banie01 wrote: » "Circumstances" are never going to allow for an all island solution then are they? If we can't afford Republicans a place at the political table down here? What chance do Unionists have of ever feeling involved and acknowledged in our political process...
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » Hopefully they never are involved or acknowledged.
facehugger99 wrote: » Randomers on social-media are your primary consideration when considering who to vote for? It certainly makes a mockery of those who believe SF are party for weak-minded fools.
seamus wrote: » The saddest thing here is that an ad campaign that was set up with specifically non-sectarian intent to appeal to both sides.
maccored wrote: » if you take your view of the north from an advert .... says a lot