The examples the company cited include "promoting a phony miracle cure for a serious illness, claiming the earth is flat, or making blatantly false claims about historic events like 9/11."
King Mob wrote: » Ok. So why does the holocaust museum post it?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » No clue:)
King Mob wrote: » Huh. So maybe since they are actual historians who have actual training and qualifications and do actual research, maybe they know something about that document and others that you don't? Why does the holocaust museum give an incorrect figure for the holocaust?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You said was a holocaust document, not me. Clearly you did not know when the holocaust period was. Stop trying to lay the blame on me for your mistake. Why don't you ask the Museum?
Dohnjoe wrote: » Why is it taught in schools and around the world that around 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust? Either there's a conspiracy going on there, or you genuinely believe you know more than the consensus of modern historians on the subject (without ever having opened a book on the subject) Which is it..
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Thought in schools 9/11 was done by bin laden and his 19 hijackers and there no conspiracy and thought in schools JFK was killed by one guy Oswald. It's way things are!
King Mob wrote: » I don't need to ask the museum because I agree with them and their presentation of the facts. You haven't shown a good reason to doubt those facts. It is a holocaust document. I don't believe you when you claim it isn't because you are not trustworthy on any measure. So moving on... Why do you believe the holocaust museum is presenting incorrect figures for the holocaust? Did all of the historians in the holocaust museum make a terrible mistake? Or are they deliberately faking things?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Even though I just posted a screenshot of holocaust period 1941- 1945. Your document from 1940.
Dohnjoe wrote: » It's called the truth, which is based on factual history. It has a habit of being consistent Unlike your personal opinions on this subject which are just opinions that no one in this thread agrees with.
King Mob wrote: » Well for one, it's not my document. It's a document pointed to by actual historians. Secondly, I don't believe you when you claim that the document is from 1940. You have claimed documents and pictures show things that they don't.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You get your truth from Metabunk. Mick west still hasn't figured out yet why the Hulsey models has no collisions and dynamic movement. When it's obvious to me why that is. His debunking laughable.
Dohnjoe wrote: » And now you've spun off from Holocaust denial into 911 conspiracy stuff Every thread like this is a dumpster fire, what do you think that demonstrates..
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You posted, you mad person
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You guys derailed this thread, with the holocaust talk.:rolleyes:.
King Mob wrote: » Nope. I just brought up holocaust denial as an example of "alternate" thinking that most people, nullzero included would agree is nonsense and unacceptable. It is easily replaceable with the notions of flat earth or creationism. You were the the one barging in with false, ill informed claims about the holocaust. Such anti-historical tripe shouldn't be left unchallenged.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Write a book about it I can't take you guys seriously because every conspiracy needs to be challenged. Any evidence that challenges the norm is dismissed.
King Mob wrote: » Lol lots of personal comments there. But I'm just asking a simple question to clarify your stance. I believe based on your comments that: 1. You believe that cheerful is engaging in holocaust denial. 2. You believe his holocaust denial is not acceptable. However I feel that if I stated these things as a fact you would again claim I was misrepresenting you. Are these two points accurate?
nullzero wrote: » You're asking a simple question that has been answered already on multiple occasions.
nullzero wrote: » You are seeing this discussion in terms of me being pro freedom of expression therefore I must agree with everything Cheerful spring is saying
King Mob wrote: » Now, to avoid disagreeing with a conspiracy theorist you're walking back on your previous stance. So now, do you believe that holocaust denial is an acceptable form of "alternative" thought? If so, why did you change your mind?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Any evidence that challenges the norm is dismissed.
nullzero wrote: » Above is an example of what I cited earlier. In your last post to said and I quote; "Never said or argued or indicated this." I am not given over to making statements I cannot back up with fact when it comes to quoting other posters. Here I have given you an example of you engaging in behaviour you deny engaging in. You have accused me of similar behaviour but when I have asked you to provide evidence you have repeatedly ignored my requests. This is why I described you as having engaged in debating in bad faith. You are constantly attempting to skew the playing field to your advantage using every dirty trick you can muster. You need to take stock of this and I would suggest you could do better, currently it's impossible to take you seriously in light of your behaviour.
Dohnjoe wrote: » You're backtracking with this pious act after basically backing a poster who turned out to be a raving Holocaust denier
nullzero wrote: » Above is an example of what I cited earlier. In your last post to said and I quote; "Never said or argued or indicated this." .
King Mob wrote: » Not every conspiracy needs to be challenged. But Holocaust denial does because not only is it just factually wrong, it stems from racist propaganda and it muddies an important part of history. Cheerful, you aren't a historian and you haven't done anything even close to approaching research. You claims aren't "alternative" though as that implies that it somehow on the same level of the opinion and research of real, rational experts.
nullzero wrote: » Otherwise all the above is hyperbole.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Every second you say it’s holocaust denial, I laugh. Jewish historians don’t even agree about the numbers, some go as low at 4 million, some say 5 million, some say 6 million, some go higher. Maybe read why I dispute the number 6 million?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You guys are claiming every man, woman and child in 1933 census was killed by the holocaust and that not backed up anything but wishful thinking.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
