guyfawkes5 wrote: » And the article mentions only the fourth biggest bank in the US is doing this. And it's temporary to "focus on existing customers".
Hubertj wrote: » and what are your thoughts on "higher end" properties €1M ish new or old builds? Also why would the REITs / investors flee market if they are still getting good return?
pearcider wrote: » https://therealdeal.com/2020/04/13/700-credit-score-and-20-down-jpmorgan-ups-home-loan-standards/ 20% deposit requirements coming soon to a bank near you.
Claw Hammer wrote: » There are a lot of people in nursing homes with dementia who are only going to leave in a box. The house should be sold and the family given their 77% of the proceeds.
schmittel wrote: » 62,000 are holiday homes which makes sense. But 95,000 are urban, and 43,000 are apartments. From a rental point of view the majority of this stock are unlikely to be the wrong locations, uninhabitable or not serviced. On rent reductions, I don't think anyone is suggesting rents are going to halve, but what do you think will happen with Dublin rents over the next 12 months - remain stable, fall or rise? And if rise or fall, what sort of %?
TheSheriff wrote: » A new type of email today from an EA - providing us with a "market view" of the areas we have previously expressed interest in; advising us of what prices were recently achieved in that area, and prices we can expect to pay for a 3 bed located in X, Y etc. We've been looking for several months; never received one of these before so new to us. Nothing to see here. Business as usual.
Donald Trump wrote: » How would you suggest that it should work? Bear in mind that not everyone going into a nursing home would intend to be going there for good (even if they end up that way). You could have old people who maybe have a fall and nobody to look after them or an unsuitable house for recuperation. I would say that Fair Deal probably actually hastens the sale of a property on the other end because there is a defined percentage owed on it.
lomb wrote: » The other thing unique to Ireland is that loans are at 3.5 times earnings versus 4.5-5 in the UK. Apart from crappy south Dublin semis and other property for 400-800 which could fall 1/3 (maybe I'm biased as see no value)I can't see standard stuff falling at all or new builds or properties under 400 Apartments could well drop as REITs and investors flee.
Rock77 wrote: » I agree both are culpable but I believe all main parties said they would build thousands of homes. So the gov didn’t house the current homeless and want to build more houses. The ‘looney left’ want to build more houses. I was just commenting on the obvious bias in the posters reaction.
fliball123 wrote: » Hang on if the truth is that 200k houses are not occupied both are culpable the gov for not housing the current homeless and the lefties for wanting more houses to be built on the tax payers dime
Cuddlesworth wrote: » Even with those roles, if you live in Dublin can you afford to compete against the wages of a person who lives in the west of Ireland?
smurgen wrote: » In my line of work there are tax substance and legal considerations that require fulfilment.legally these jobs cannot be outsourced.
Zenify wrote: » I'm seeing a couple of houses come back on market but not as much as I was expecting. I also saw a house that I was interested in go sale agreeded a little over a week ago. I rang the estate agent and they said seller wants to move fast and accepted first bid (I dont blame them).
PommieBast wrote: » Not sure about specific properties I looked at previously, but have seen a few suspicious things such as multiple apartments in the same blocks now being listed.
OwlsZat wrote: » I'm seeing lots of houses I was looking at over the last 6 months come back onto the market. Sales falling through I'd guess. Anyone else seeing the same?
beauf wrote: » Scientific unlikely. What you should be comparing is the productivity of people in the office (zilch) and those at home during the pandemic. Not comparing normal productivity with that during the pandemic. Though either is a bit pointless. I'd say one outcome will be people will look at new properties, and their existing accommodate to see how it can accommodate a home office. This experience will highlight a lot of issues like that.
Claw Hammer wrote: » Fair Deal is causing quite a number of homes to remain vacant. It is utterly ridiculous.
Cuddlesworth wrote: » Would be worth pointing out once a physical location is no longer required, labour location is looked at next. Why do you need to pay staff here to work at home, when you can pay staff in "low cost" locations to do the same roles. Usually the counter argument is localisation, having teams in the same office means greater "collaboration and communication". If it works out of the office, then why do you need to pay Irish wages to do it? You already see this in IT where the majority of support work could be done remotely. So work got moved to cheaper locations at fractions of the cost.