IAMAMORON wrote: » I cannot smoke cannabis anymore because it turns me into a paranoid mess. I much prefer drinking now. When I was a teenager and in my early twenties I did not get as much paranoia, it creeps up on you. Some of the grass being smoked these days is far too strong. I have friends who don't suffer any negative side effects, they are middle aged and get a great benefit out of it. It might be worth adding that they tend to not drink that much either, I think mindset is paramount on your enjoyment of either.
Deleted User wrote: » It's a cop out. It's an excuse for other problems, and justifying dependencies. I have never known a person actually addicted to weed. I've known hundreds of stoners throughout the last three decades of being a smoker myself, and none of them were addicted. They smoked regularly, and used their weed as a prop for various activities like music or art, but they're weren't addicted. I really wish people would stop pushing the addictive aspect of weed. There is none. There is a desire to smoke, and missing it when it's not available, but that's not addiction... Making addiction into covering far more than it should is not helping anyone. Anyone having issues with getting out of bed is more likely to have other issues such as depression or other underlying concerns. Weed just exaggerates pre-existing conditions, and honestly, some people just shouldn't be smoking weed at all. Especially in the quantities that I find such people tend to do. There is nothing worse to weed than Alcohol, or many other drug substances, and a lot better. It's not what you seem to think it is.
Ultrflat wrote: » I think the problem is people smoke to get stoned and not to get high. There is a massive difference.
Kylta wrote: » I agree people dont seem to be able to enjoy drugs even weed, when I was smoking it I can recall ever fighting among friends ( ok I was stoned) now you see some people after a few joints and they think there some one. Unless the structure of the drugs has changed over the years.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Professor Jim Lucey was on the Pat Kenny radio show last year, and spoke about the devastating impact that weed is having on a lot of the people who turn up at St. Patrick's Hospital looking for treatment. Jim isn't some nobody; he was the director of St Patrick's hospital for 25 years; the professor of psychiatry at Trinity, and widely regarded as the foremost psychiatrist in the country. He said the weed being sold in Ireland these days is grown in those grow houses under lights, and is an order of magnitude stronger than the hash or weed that was available in Ireland for many years. He said the image of it being a benign drug associated with hippies, students, and chilling out on the couch is one that needs to be tackled. Modern cannabis is a dangerous and dirty drug that is causing huge spikes in young men (at least who they saw presenting for treatment) having life-changing psychosis. It's turning them into little more than vegetables.
Arghus wrote: » Despite all my reservations about weed I can't say that tallies with my experience of the drug. I would have never have found weed to make people more aggressive or angry. Quite the opposite in fact. Aggression often felt impossible. I never saw anyone with enough energy still in them to be genuinely angry. Certainly confusion could lead to disagreements, but usually everything was put down to being stoned and kind of forgotten about. I sorry but I should have read my post before I posted it im meant can't recall instead of can. In my day when I smoked we were more pacified. And I agree with your above post. Sorry again over spelling error
Huntergonzo wrote: » Alcohol is a far better drug than weed. If you want to smoke weed then fire away, but it's very over-rated.
chrissb8 wrote: » A lot of people echoing similar sentiments in this thread who are/were smokers. Weed is brilliant but such an insidious drug due to the perceived "harmless" nature of it. And it is relatively harmless, in moderation, although there are those who are productive on it I found any long term smokers in my life were always "stuck". That is they hid away behind weed, smoking was the only lifestyle and the anxiety of not having it showed. The prospect of filling your time with something productive or beneficial to your life was something that seemed daunting and scary. For me it stemmed from by and large not being happy with my life and hiding away in smoking away. I still smoke but have learned to take long breaks, I can't deny I love weed but I would much rather now have it as a reward in downtime after I've achieved something.
Arghus wrote: » Fair enough bro. Whatever makes you happy I guess. If it works for you, it works for you.
Deleted User wrote: » I've known many people who were able to smoke regularly while holding down professional positions or running their own companies. The real problem for stoners is when they have nothing to do. University students don't count because even without weed, they're just as likely to waste time. For those who are unemployed, then weed isn't particularly healthy because it doesn't encourage them to do anything to change their situation, but then, neither does anything they might do/take/drink. However, for those with a job or other responsibilities that require them to do something, weed doesn't prevent them from pursuing those responsibilities. If they're not pursuing those responsibilities, then it's likely something closer to procrastination, or depression that's causing issues... Weed is just a convenient excuse. There's too much BS about associations here. The people who waste time on weed are people who would be wasting time anyway. They just happen to be on weed. I've lived both sides of that coin.. weed wasn't the problem. Lack of personal motivation and direction which could be absent regardless of whether weed was involved... was.
mr_fegelien wrote: » Have you tried benzos with weed? I know a friend who had panic attacks when smoking and tried Xanax. It worked but also potentiated the high
Kelvin Obnoxious Needlepoint wrote: » I've seen a few threads discussing cannabis use on boards. This is the first one where people expressing concerns about it weren't being shouted down. Always saw militant stoners insisting it was a wonderful and benign substance.
Potential-Monke wrote: » Here's something I want to tackle. Why do you have to be 'active' and 'doing things' to be successful, or not waste your life? Is someone who decides to not have kids wasting their lives? Is someone who can keep a regular job but isn't very social wasting their lives? Is a gamer wasting their life? What about people who read fiction books?
chrissb8 wrote: » Fair enough, I know where you're coming from. But in my life with the people I know who were smokers have said that by and large smoking was a crutch that stifled them into a trap of sedated bliss. When they stopped, they started filling their lives with meaningful things such as hobbies, relationships etc.
They weren't crippled with existential dread or anything, they just loved smoking and getting high. Once they realised it was sapping too much time/money they stopped. The people I know who smoked all have/had good jobs, degrees and the rest while smoking too but smoking was an absolute must in their life and they committed to it hard. That commitment to weed made them neglect aspects of their lives because the feeling of getting stoned/high was a top priority. They came out of smoking and they improved in existing areas of their lives.
Just like some people bury their problems in drink they can bury them in other things that make them feel good too. It's almost like some people want to say weed has no negative effects whatsoever and their lives are symptomatic of the person they are. Which is nonsense to me as it is a drug that must be respected and used within the right context, for me at least. If someone wants to go around stoned and can live their lives fairplay to them.
I understand what you're saying but to say weed is not the problem but motivation or depression is the root, is just a fallacy. I've seen both sides of the coin too, but mostly one more than the other. But this is all tit for tat arguments anyway, each person is different and you, like me, are just relaying our experiences.
biko wrote: » Yes, I think alcohol should be legal
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » (And I rarely do cannabis).