OU812 wrote: » *their They really haven't "destroyed" anything. The majority of people were more than happy to receive their voucher (+10%). Some were upset, but if they pushed, they got a refund. Personally, I think their handling of the situation showed innovation & business smarts.
BonnieSituation wrote: » That's how I am feeling about my flight to Glasgow on Friday week. And it's what happened to me about a flight to AMS on Friday March 13th when this all kicked off. But still I wait to send off for the inevitable refund that will ensue.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » Aer Lingus are lucky to have gotten away with there sly and unacceptable handing of refunds/cancellations. They have destroyed what most would describe as good working relationship between Aer Lingus and Irish travel agents over this.
goingnowhere wrote: » 40 minutes... No point flying if there is no one onboard and if no one checks in on the far side, why burn the fuel? If you fail to check in there is no refund, option of a voucher was provided
Tenger wrote: » I assume you have a date and flight number. Date alone would be OK as we can check the departures info and/or flight radar to get the playback. Checkin closes I think 1 hour before STD. Otherwise that's just a story............
Captain_Crash wrote: » A flight to EDI had pushed back in DUB before going back onto stand and eventually being cancelled, they had waited until check in for the return flight closed in EDI (no one had checked in for either flight out or back, but cancellation after check in closes generally means no refunds)
murphaph wrote: » Thanks for that. EI are being pretty sneaky. The flight is obviously going to be cancelled tomorrow but they still haven't sent me an email to this effect. They would quite happily let me drag my whole family to the airport to find out it isn't going.
mikel97 wrote: » Ja. For now. I came on last one. 6 people
Shn99 wrote: » Anyone think EI will allow passengers to get vouchers for travel in June? Have flights booked but no intention of travelling at all.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » They will likely extend change deadlines if for example Spain doesn't re-open for business etc. You will unlikely get a voucher unless they cannot operate the flight.
goingnowhere wrote: » EI9024 to PEK took off using 16 this evening
murphaph wrote: » Dies anyone know if EI have completely suspended DUB-TXL now? They were flying an augmented schedule every second day but now it seems nothing.
flange888 wrote: » The LR's are owned by Air Lease Corporation...they wouldn't be happy with people thinking they are GECAS airframes! God only knows what they will do but I suspect they will stick with the LR order.
john boye wrote: » Iberia A340s would be in line too I'd imagine.
GM228 wrote: » https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news/88461-iag-looks-to-retire-bas-b747s-iberias-a340s?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=linkedin A330-200s I would assume:- BA I would assume:-
Walsh added that "a couple" of A330s operated by Aer Lingus (EI, Dublin Int'l) could also be permanently retired. The Irish carrier operates four A330-200s (17.8 years old on average) and eleven A330-300s (6.5). It owns three -200s and seven -300s, and leases one -200 from Castlelake, two -300s from Nomura Babcock & Brown, and one -300 each from AerCap and Castlelake.
Finally, the group could also consider retiring around 20 narrowbody aircraft. Walsh did not specify from which carrier they would potentially come.