Deleted User wrote: » So, you have no reason or example then.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Loads of reasons to give a new party a go at it. Examples would be their intolerance of big business/banking interests before the ordinary person. May all be a hill of beans, but compared to the mess these fundamentals of a caring decent society have been left in by the power swap party's I am prepared to give them a go at it. They have paid their dues in opposition and the duty imposed on proper opposition party's. I think the power swap supporters call it 'whinging and hurling on the ditch', I call it a duty to over-sight and calling to account.
Deleted User wrote: » Classic deflection. No examples to point out in NI. No reasons to trust SF at it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » And I have told you why. What are FF/FG offering...more of the same with a Minister whose failure caused the collapse of the last government? You vote for that if you wish. I will until my dying day try to effect change with my vote. If SF fail then they get the same treatment.
Deleted User wrote: » I doubt any man who gives 30k posts to his support of SF is going to be easily swayed from them. Noting they've done (or more accurately, failed to do) in NI has swayed you away from them so far. I do (sometimes) wonder if people who think Ireland's health system is terrible have had to interact with other health systems. I don't think it's great, but I don't think it's bad either.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Many many of my posts have nothing to do with SF (most of my posts are about pro-anti republican stuff - there is a difference) and a good share in the Brexit thread has been fully behind what Ireland were doing and fighting for. I never said or compared our health system to anywhere else. I am dismayed that ours fails so many. As we do in other areas of the governing of the state too.
Mortelaro wrote: » What percentage of your posts are not related to Sinn Féin, a decimal point cover them ,1 ,2 or 3 every hundred or less than 1 ? His point is valid
FrancieBrady wrote: » Thread is not about me. Hate having to remind you guys.
Sultan_of_Ping wrote: » So to be clear, there are no examples of a major project being led by an SF politician coming in on or ahead of time, or at or below budget......and were expected to believe they can deliver multi-year, multi-billion euro housing, health and social care projects?? Guess we better double that €22billion they're planning to borrow
Deleted User wrote: » Boys in all.fairness FG handed BAM a blank cheque to build.the most expensive hospideal in the world (18 months behind scedule,before all this virus shìte too) I have reason to deal with BAM and such a tight shower of baxtards to get paid off and.we hand em.a blank cheque at our expense... Then people proceed to critise SF for capital expenditure record....you cant be for real
blanch152 wrote: » Well the recent Cash for Ash enquiry criticised SF for their role in that, so they can't claim to be any better, in fact as another poster said, you can see many ways and many reasons why they could make things worse.
Sultan_of_Ping wrote: » So, that's still a "no" and as I predicted someone went straight for the whataboutery card and the children's hospital. SF have zero track record of successfully delivering major change projects, if they didn't someone would've pointed to an example when asked. I wouldn't trust them with a bed pan, don't mind our whole health system.
FrancieBrady wrote: » They have delivered equal rights and a share of the power in northern Ireland and have satisfied those they represented enough to be the still by far and away the most popular party. That is good enough for me if you are looking for credentials as to their fitness. They have also IMO excelled themselves in the duty of being an opposition party. That is more than enough for them to qualify for a vote. And I make no apology for that.
Sultan_of_Ping wrote: » Seriously, that's you example of a "large scale change project" - what was the budget and the outturn? What you're saying is because they got elected, they can run a health service I got elected as a student rep, doesn't mean I can run a university!! Btw, if you want an example of SF/NI ineptness check out the Belfast/Bangor rail line upgrade - we did it as a case study when I was doing a PPMO qual - late, 100% over budget and increased journey times The Republic is in no way perfect, but the idea SF can't make it unimaginably worse is beyond parody - and here they won't have Westminster to bail them out.
Kensley Itchy Sugar wrote: » If they are reasons to give SF a go then we are screwed. I hate banks before the ordinary person ( whoever they are) but I wouldn't put ML on the government benches in a fit. How caring where then when people where getting knee capped.. Francie i expected better reasoning for you. Time for you to swap allegiance and give the greens a vote After all Eamon is caring and has served his time in opposition and government. And he likes fluffy bunnies
[Deleted User] wrote: » Eamonn ryan also proposed growing lettuce to solve the cv-19 crisis Quite why people think they are more suited to run the country than the healy-raes is beyond me :pac: Jesus id be mortified if i was a member of green party to have that gowl as a leader
Kensley Itchy Sugar wrote: » You forgot the wolves!
Deleted User wrote: » Hmm....i said its laughable for anyone supporting present government to critise anyone on capital expenditure....given the way the hospideal is gone It started at 600 million....how much ove budget and time is it gone to now?? Your right to critise SF,but you dont appear to have a leg to stand on,without being a hypicrite (which your entitled to be)
Key findings from the report include: -The A5 upgrade, linking counties Londonderry and Tyrone, has a £300m overspend and has been overrun by 10 years. -The Regional Children's Hospital has a £130m overspend and has overrun by five years. -The cost of building UU's new Belfast campus is now expected to be £363.9m - more than £100m over budget. The European Investment Bank (EIB) has already withdrawn a £150m loan because of project delays. -The new Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA) stadium at Casement Park in west Belfast has an overspend of £33m. It has still not started three years after the expected completion date. -The critical care centre at the Royal Victoria Hospital is over budget by £57m and has over run by eight years. -The new maternity hospital in Belfast is six years overdue and is £17m over budget.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Tell you what. You set your criteria for an incoming government and I will set mine. Why are you trying to impose criteria on me...what kind of dictatorial nonsense is that?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Sultan...I don't know whether they can deliver or not. I voted for them for the first time and wanted them a 'part' of government not in sole power. I am sick of being lied to by the power swap party's. FG's abject failure...abject! to deliver change after the promises of 2011 being the final straw. Get off the pot boys and girls, you have been found out. Change is possible if the will is there and it has taken a pandemic to show us. The people will knuckle down and do what is best, if it is shown that it is for the best. The spirit hasn't been broken.
Sultan_of_Ping wrote: » Ok, so again, still no example of SF delivering any kind of project of scale? NCH will probably be about 2 to 2.5 times over budget, but where's the evidence that if SF were in charge it wouldn't be 4 or 5 times over budget?Plenty of evidence they can't deliver these projects.....
Deleted User wrote: » To best my knowledge BAM think its going to.cost 2.8 billion by time.its kitted out...your 2 to 2.5 times over budget is along long way short (quite possibly gone over this cost already??) Despite being a.shower of baxtards to get paid off....im also good mates with many people working in office there (they've spent 150K on pr to cover their arses in case it blows up,and they struggle to get more contracts) Will the NCH even get finished after this virus