Lonesomerhodes wrote: » And? You are still making assumpations as me questioning something or someone doesnt mean I fit into your little boxes ie antivaxxer or whatever buzzwords you like to use. You can question things in a deomocracy (well for now!) So you spent your whole lunch break copying and pasting old posts of mine?. No nice meal, no walk, just copying on this? Thats beyond sad.
jimmyrustle wrote: » The other week on FB Gilroy put up a colour coded map of "countries that have reported COVID19 cases" alongside another map purporting to show countries that have rolled out 5G, as some sort of proof of a link. Incredibly, the map apparently showing countries that reported COVID19 showed that Ireland, the country Ben fights for daily, as not having any reported cases of the virus. Imagine taking any sort of advice from such a raging clown.
whippet wrote: » If you put two maps on top of each other you’d see that beaches are almost always in the same location as lethal shark attacks .... so by bens logic beaches kill people
Lonesomerhodes wrote: » And? You are still making assumpations as me questioning something or someone doesnt mean I fit into your little boxes ie antivaxxer or whatever buzzwords you like to use. You can question things in a deomocracy (well for now!) So you spent your whole lunch break searching copying and pasting old posts of mine?. No nice meal, no walk, just rooting around searching my old posts to copy on this? Thats beyond sad.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » who has their lunch at 11.30? or maybe it isn't 11.30 where you are.
Lonesomerhodes wrote: » I agree she has some decent points but not the best at communicating them.
DubInMeath wrote: » Defaulting to the standard truther behavior already I see. Took two minutes out of lunch to do plenty of time to do this other things on your list.
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » One thing is for certain, that was some outburst with the cops. That will get her the mainstream attentions she is craving, but it wont end well.
The Nal wrote: » It won't get her mainstream attention. The only reason she is in any way (semi) famous is because of the sheer volume (of crap) she puts out there. From her electoral history and the pathetic numbers she generated at that Barrow St thing, its clear its just a morbid fascination with someone who is crazy. Even the National Party have disowned her now.
jimmyrustle wrote: » I said it before here, I wonder what stunt she will pull to remain in the public eye once Twitter inevitably ban her. She may well move into the Travis Bickle stage.
circadian wrote: » Gemma has zero decent points.
Lonesomerhodes wrote: » The Mary Boyle documentary had several decent interesting points and is well made for a shoestring budget documentary. She was calm factual curious polite and getting people to open up in it; a far far cry from her demeanour now bur it shows she was a good journalist at one point. However try get an Irish "journalist" nowadays to make a documentary like that. All we get is vacuous crap from them. Her problem I think is she has megalomania now with all you lot obsessing over 24/7 here!. People who apparently hate her and think shes "dangerous" trawl through her twitter everyday to "catch her out" on something then rattle on she should be banned from twitter. Sure what would these folk do with their lifes if that happened??. Careful what you wish for and all that!.
Lonesomerhodes wrote: » 2 minutes my arze. Anyway Standard truther behaviour? Is there such a thing?. Met many folk who would question things from Christians to devout Atheists to New Age believers but certainly their behaviour is anything but uniform. Individual people with individual behaviours and opinions. More assumpations. Standard behaviour. Meh
humberklog wrote: » What an idiot (and shocking coward) she is. The vehicle reg checks (tax, nct (not sure of insurance) are now done by phone. Handy tool. . I think the Gard was a bit daft getting out to her asking her what she said. But she can't be arrested for being a total gowel.
circadian wrote: » I've got more Internet points than you.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Any source for this? I can't see any reference on the RTE website.
pinkyeye wrote: » Leo said it at the last conference he gave, now of course he could have been telling porkie pies.
DubInMeath wrote: » Yep two minutes to find them using the search function on here and standard keywords then post them. Which gives 58 minutes to go for a walk in the sun and have something to eat, then back to trying to fix the backdoors and other malware sh1te on multiple machines from morons visiting anti vax and fake covid sites.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » :pac::pac::pac: Was she in the natural law party?
Lonesomerhodes wrote: » Thats essential work?. Most IT staff off nowadays. I smell a tall tale why would there be malware on covid sites? So You looked at every single site visited and noted the ip address it came from and every single one was either anti vaccine or fake covid sites nothing else?. Hmmmmmm.
DubInMeath wrote: » We are in our sh1te off work, your living in cloud cuckoo land if you think that. This site is still running what do you think keeps it and everything else running good vibrations? Also plenty of tools for finding the source of infections once their known. Even looking at logs with a lot of patience and knowledge gives you enough information. Also the fact that these sites are being used by hackers and scammers, especially regarding covid is fairly common knowledge, would have thought a truther would be aware of that.
Lonesomerhodes wrote: » Cloud Cuckoo ok but I know several IT companies have shut up shop. Hackers and scammers operate on any website or platform on planet Earth its a moot point.
Lonesomerhodes wrote: Why would a covid19 information site have scammers? Cant think of any that require personal information if you know them what sites are they?.
Lonesomerhodes wrote: » Cloud Cuckoo ok but I know several IT companies have shut up shop. Hackers and scammers operate on any website or platform on planet Earth its a moot point. Why would a covid19 information site have scammers? Cant think of any that require personal information if you know them what sites are they?.